From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-186.mta0.migadu.com (out-186.mta0.migadu.com [91.218.175.186]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9F6B3EF0C8 for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2026 15:46:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.186 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785512771; cv=none; b=aGU73puhQVVjiZ6wiWv0NiQQA1do7mFwHnp5aoSF77jp2g9w7RGhXZ/QCdv/y1sAz3AGF8zpU4CsnlDej4FK7wW99h3y+Jt+e7wPxzmutMASk3otCLU2wBEm5W+nNUsWSFZ2Syp2dF231b0VNiYOe1gy4UbAa+IBxJIl3Sawgzk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785512771; c=relaxed/simple; bh=IBsP0yIp4hizlUWX48RA5d1IoaYpiPpLHHtYnaNL1cI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=apPs6VMRMCr2Xn+CCSTyIal40hgpEOz0W0ov5NgRuXxaNpClnlWeei7vLaDv+aicG7vAEL5bZAXmXPhTdcsmoC8cHj3pyVj8sojP/+WtPwegFLsG0U+dttZPFhpeS5RiSrJl+HEKpziRrK0/9YMCJlp+T/GaqTz8CQVQa+nK6FY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=wyuan.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=wyuan.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=wyuan.org header.i=@wyuan.org header.b=tIj/Pdke; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.186 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=wyuan.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=wyuan.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=wyuan.org header.i=@wyuan.org header.b="tIj/Pdke" Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2026 23:45:48 +0800 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=wyuan.org; s=key1; t=1785512757; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=//STl+si+eGCX61KjNFuIRqf8ohMGJldZHL4mxeZzeI=; b=tIj/PdkekRnsXQrKG0E5jW3wLYHg3DsHNZh/CpUiAbTGWvPpRFpXB8ehgD5OT2GfKYrm/6 8BeK0lTtTB0dzZDgFKGkEPptg+9AZt9hQl1NSUQrrD5LUIbbgX8btg+AVKFpD6cisOw+j1 WdneFxzIqQiKpM2qxJnV9+nRqPf2YEydNJxlxQYuT73XX5e5n1BmcgSKA/witO8Xzq0Tkb oPPBB1v1yXTbCBZ5RU6GKn3DEwBKUKkLFMCeIbMcV1X1K2/rHHfu7QXfNv/DUx1lH+XF45 PFi0T6sIz/Y/bSmYrT15qJCYAN9tiFM18WRB2JPf7mZveRYqbT/I+Kwd3z6AGw== X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Weijie Yuan To: Jonathan Corbet Cc: Chen-Yu Yeh , Alex Shi , Dongliang Mu , Yanteng Si , Hu Haowen <2023002089@link.tyut.edu.cn>, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: update Traditional Chinese documentation maintainers Message-ID: References: <20260731032101.7244-1-chenyou910331@gmail.com> <87o6fn5n2h.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87o6fn5n2h.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT On Fri, Jul 31, 2026 at 07:02:46AM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > Weijie Yuan writes: > > >> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > >> index 2f9472c1a090..60f77e7fd3f5 100644 > >> --- a/MAINTAINERS > >> +++ b/MAINTAINERS > >> @@ -27460,10 +27460,11 @@ F: kernel/trace/trace_osnoise.c > >> F: kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c > >> > >> TRADITIONAL CHINESE DOCUMENTATION > >> +M: Chen-Yu Yeh > >> +M: Weijie Yuan > >> M: Hu Haowen <2023002089@link.tyut.edu.cn> > > > > Agreed: Haowen is always welcomed :-) > > Nonetheless, I'm not sure I see the value of listing a maintainer who > has not maintained for years; a move to CREDITS may be in order. Makes sense. I haven't even noticed there's a CREDITS file before. Sorry. > > I remembered Haowen sent a patch here [1] aiming to change his name and > > address to: > > > > Haowen Hu > > > > Can we pick it up here?, while it may also needs Haowen's double check.. > > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/20260220160201.41149-1-srcres258@furdevs.cn/ > > I resisted that because it was the third time churning all of those > email addresses in all of those files. If we are going to address them > now, I think the best thing is to simply remove them. Sorry about that. I was previously aware of the relevant context regarding this matter, so I only thought of simply updating his email address only here while we are at it. But obviously, moving to CREDITS is a better idea. Thanks.