From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: Sarthak Sharma <sarthak.sharma@arm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
Nico Pache <npache@redhat.com>,
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>, Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>,
Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>, Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 5/6] tools/mm: make gup_bench a benchmark only tool
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2026 12:31:20 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <anGxaETOA4a5auZC@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53e2202d-15df-4788-a6aa-1f345f0a5395@arm.com>
Hi Sarthak,
On Tue, Aug 04, 2026 at 01:04:13PM +0530, Sarthak Sharma wrote:
> Hi Mike!
>
> On 8/3/26 2:30 PM, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> >
> > And the limit checks seem wierd all over the place, like if we can loop
> > infinitely, why do we care about INT_MAX?
>
> INT_MAX checks are there since nr_pages, nthreads and repeats are stored
> as int.
>
> But yes I can keep the parameters which are not there in the ioctl ABI
> to be unsigned long, so these checks won't be required there.
> >
> > And what exact limit ULONG_MAX / MB or SIZE_MAX / sizeof(ptread_t) are
> > supposed to express?
>
> ULONG_MAX / MB prevents size *= MB from overflowing. SIZE_MAX /
> sizeof(ptread_t) prevents thread array allocation size from overflowing.
To me these checks seem overprotective from one side and not actually
serving a real purpose from the other.
Like e.g. requesting INT_MAX - 1 pages passes the check but it means almost 8TB
of memory and that's really wild.
I'd say let's keep things simple and if a user is stupid enough to run this
with peculiar command line just let it crash.
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-04 9:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-30 14:08 [PATCH v6 0/6] selftests/mm: separate GUP microbenchmarking from functional testing Sarthak Sharma
2026-07-30 14:08 ` [PATCH v6 1/6] selftests/mm: make file helpers return errors Sarthak Sharma
2026-08-03 9:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-08-04 6:39 ` Sarthak Sharma
2026-07-30 14:08 ` [PATCH v6 2/6] tools/lib/mm: add shared file helpers Sarthak Sharma
2026-08-03 9:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-08-04 6:43 ` Sarthak Sharma
2026-08-04 9:23 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-07-30 14:08 ` [PATCH v6 3/6] tools/lib/mm: move hugepage_settings out of selftests Sarthak Sharma
2026-08-03 9:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-08-03 12:44 ` Mark Brown
2026-07-30 14:08 ` [PATCH v6 4/6] tools/mm: move gup_test from selftests/mm to tools/mm Sarthak Sharma
2026-07-30 14:08 ` [PATCH v6 5/6] tools/mm: make gup_bench a benchmark only tool Sarthak Sharma
2026-08-03 9:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-08-04 7:34 ` Sarthak Sharma
2026-08-04 9:31 ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
2026-07-30 14:08 ` [PATCH v6 6/6] selftests/mm: add a GUP selftest Sarthak Sharma
2026-08-03 9:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-08-04 7:38 ` Sarthak Sharma
2026-08-04 9:35 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-08-03 9:00 ` [PATCH v6 0/6] selftests/mm: separate GUP microbenchmarking from functional testing Mike Rapoport
2026-08-04 6:36 ` Sarthak Sharma
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=anGxaETOA4a5auZC@kernel.org \
--to=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=npache@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=sarthak.sharma@arm.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox