Linux Documentation
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: Sarthak Sharma <sarthak.sharma@arm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
	Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
	"Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
	Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>,
	Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Nico Pache <npache@redhat.com>,
	Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>, Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>,
	Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>, Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
	John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
	Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 5/6] tools/mm: make gup_bench a benchmark only tool
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2026 12:31:20 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <anGxaETOA4a5auZC@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53e2202d-15df-4788-a6aa-1f345f0a5395@arm.com>

Hi Sarthak,

On Tue, Aug 04, 2026 at 01:04:13PM +0530, Sarthak Sharma wrote:
> Hi Mike!
> 
> On 8/3/26 2:30 PM, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> >  
> > And the limit checks seem wierd all over the place, like if we can loop
> > infinitely, why do we care about INT_MAX?
> 
> INT_MAX checks are there since nr_pages, nthreads and repeats are stored
> as int.
> 
> But yes I can keep the parameters which are not there in the ioctl ABI
> to be unsigned long, so these checks won't be required there.
> > 
> > And what exact limit ULONG_MAX / MB or SIZE_MAX / sizeof(ptread_t) are
> > supposed to express?
> 
> ULONG_MAX / MB prevents size *= MB from overflowing. SIZE_MAX /
> sizeof(ptread_t) prevents thread array allocation size from overflowing.

To me these checks seem overprotective from one side and not actually
serving a real purpose from the other.

Like e.g. requesting INT_MAX - 1 pages passes the check but it means almost 8TB
of memory and that's really wild.

I'd say let's keep things simple and if a user is stupid enough to run this
with peculiar command line just let it crash.

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-04  9:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-30 14:08 [PATCH v6 0/6] selftests/mm: separate GUP microbenchmarking from functional testing Sarthak Sharma
2026-07-30 14:08 ` [PATCH v6 1/6] selftests/mm: make file helpers return errors Sarthak Sharma
2026-08-03  9:00   ` Mike Rapoport
2026-08-04  6:39     ` Sarthak Sharma
2026-07-30 14:08 ` [PATCH v6 2/6] tools/lib/mm: add shared file helpers Sarthak Sharma
2026-08-03  9:00   ` Mike Rapoport
2026-08-04  6:43     ` Sarthak Sharma
2026-08-04  9:23       ` Mike Rapoport
2026-07-30 14:08 ` [PATCH v6 3/6] tools/lib/mm: move hugepage_settings out of selftests Sarthak Sharma
2026-08-03  9:00   ` Mike Rapoport
2026-08-03 12:44     ` Mark Brown
2026-07-30 14:08 ` [PATCH v6 4/6] tools/mm: move gup_test from selftests/mm to tools/mm Sarthak Sharma
2026-07-30 14:08 ` [PATCH v6 5/6] tools/mm: make gup_bench a benchmark only tool Sarthak Sharma
2026-08-03  9:00   ` Mike Rapoport
2026-08-04  7:34     ` Sarthak Sharma
2026-08-04  9:31       ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
2026-07-30 14:08 ` [PATCH v6 6/6] selftests/mm: add a GUP selftest Sarthak Sharma
2026-08-03  9:00   ` Mike Rapoport
2026-08-04  7:38     ` Sarthak Sharma
2026-08-04  9:35       ` Mike Rapoport
2026-08-03  9:00 ` [PATCH v6 0/6] selftests/mm: separate GUP microbenchmarking from functional testing Mike Rapoport
2026-08-04  6:36   ` Sarthak Sharma

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=anGxaETOA4a5auZC@kernel.org \
    --to=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
    --cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
    --cc=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=liam@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=npache@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=sarthak.sharma@arm.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox