From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-170.mta0.migadu.com (out-170.mta0.migadu.com [91.218.175.170]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78D2B4766BC for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2026 13:28:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.170 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786109322; cv=none; b=E7Himqdo5CFR4iVij7XYltbNIp7qL2t0VYj4X85fpkSjGn5lyRDieAq7Ys56KOgPF1HiJ+V9C98vjxUapWNx5bvIWQtl7s3l23USpyr+TX55HWMh+z9rRz4YKtT3rVrUKfcXy+RVjEGzOh+ztjTECe4x8lK7disxG8YJaZ+UsnQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786109322; c=relaxed/simple; bh=kC9uhcChRxr+Yf7WNSZG8OGc+4+uqAsijQ0nIbNaBeE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=HMD/apnYD6GrpYgDhTE+h/qQDs8ILe1nrkWVmS/QfIZxcrDqhs0z+6ofa8NcsMb9PmRepBd9ul3MTdtvkhh49pyKUpvyxYVPtqu70BEofoGKuaiJTCc2C1yVpdpTm9mOKhIstu++AIfNSH+3OmkHJygF5fBuI6jC3o7v9cOhOFA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=wyuan.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=wyuan.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=wyuan.org header.i=@wyuan.org header.b=jCcPZUw+; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.170 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=wyuan.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=wyuan.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=wyuan.org header.i=@wyuan.org header.b="jCcPZUw+" Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2026 21:28:20 +0800 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=wyuan.org; s=key1; t=1786109315; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=x4nEMJDUuAOuMHIVr5A8w4i/QBXuuG0Pzbd7aAEhG6w=; b=jCcPZUw+o0yQvK0fx0bLq+LD4nlPepfEV8f/pXXXsXl9O0bUM9Qeq8xURMEPOIOOpL6hcq +/uq2IjsGkjOnBh6SKIxu1z4Ru/59WFjkL7IzzFiBv8J5SrhPi7LnO7G5MNJR0Z8krQHZs rnoCsj8udXmvcynIXUTOkoffGrK3CD++4wWz5N6kefQX4W/ubCpfjgIGMcmYV7xDgJf+zV kCRnUzBHjA2eRYHLkC5E6lWRmNrgoyHWUwCJpxtVBe2IZscwfkE4RO8l3BK+3dlXwzxrVk ocm/LvWN8ZMnsaFSBOsRMsuYEbgW1arPeft5yJjWtveEwEJhTgTNUHELBhpu4Q== X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Weijie Yuan To: =?utf-8?B?6JGJ5a645L2R?= Cc: Jonathan Corbet , Alex Shi , Dongliang Mu , Yanteng Si , Hu Haowen <2023002089@link.tyut.edu.cn>, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/16] docs/zh_TW: process: localize terminology in 2.Process.rst Message-ID: References: <20260728091038.171033-1-chenyou910331@gmail.com> <20260728091038.171033-11-chenyou910331@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT On Wed, Aug 05, 2026 at 02:48:35AM +0800, 葉宸佑 wrote: > On Tue, Aug 04, 2026 at 12:22:12AM +0800, Weijie Yuan wrote: > > Either: add a before staging > > Or: remove the after staging > > > > [A] Greg Kroah-Hartman 目前負責維護staging樹。 > > [B] Greg Kroah-Hartman 目前負責維護 staging 樹。 > > > > Which one do you prefer? I think the first option is more consistent > > with the usage throughout the text. > > Sorry, I misread that as two separate changes. You are right that it > should be one or the other. > > I went and counted across the whole zh_TW tree, matching a CJK > character directly adjacent to an ASCII alphanumeric with and without > a space: > > without space: 2581 > with space: 721 > > 2.Process.rst itself is 69 without / 22 with. So [A] it is, both for > the file and for the tree as a whole. Fixed in v3. > > For what it is worth, my own preference as a Taiwanese reader would > have been [B] -- a space between CJK and Latin text is easier to read > and is what most Taiwanese technical writing does nowadays. But the > existing translations overwhelmingly do not, and this series is about > terminology, not typography. Mixing the two would make it much harder > to review. Yes, I think a space between CJK and Latin text is more "proper", or a more "universal" way. > That said, it is probably worth writing the rule down rather than > leaving each contributor to guess. I would suggest: > > - no space between CJK and ASCII (following existing practice) > - apply it to new translations and to paragraphs that are being > rewritten anyway I might be more inclined to remain neutral, so I would prefer to hear the opinions of others. Or we could take a look at how zh_CN and jp_JP handle it. Or: for new articles, we can start to require spaces between. > - do not go back and normalize existing files Of course.