Re: [PATCH] docs/zh_CN: update maintainer/configure-git.rst translation

[Weijie Yuan <wy@wyuan.org>]

On Mon, Aug 24, 2026 at 09:59:47AM +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2026/8/23 23:13, Weijie Yuan wrote:
> > Upstream documented the common 'git tag -s' workflow and cleaned up
> > unneeded RST markup. It briefly updated the automatic lore Link: hook
> > for Git 2.41 and HTTPS, then removed that guidance because Link: tags
> > should only point to useful additional information.
> > 
> > Add a SPDX-License-Identifier.
> > 
> > Remove a useless top-of-file label, as Jon always tries to do.
> > 
> > Update the translation through commit 944df7a31452
> > ("docs: update the guidance for Link: tags").
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Weijie Yuan<wy@wyuan.org>
> > ---
> > Hi Jon, I added a SPDX-License-Identifier for this file while the
> > original English one doesn't have one yet. Should I do that? / Is it
> > "legal" to do so? , if XiangCheng would be happy with what I'm doing.
> > 
> 
> I am not Jon. but usually changes should start from the original file. we
> don't add or change anything different from it.

Thanks, Alex. The reason why I asked Jon is because I have witnessed him
make some comments on this matter several times. And of course, you also
have much more experience. ;-)

And it seems that I haven't quite figured out how to handle this
identifier in different situations for our translation.

I also asked this question on another topic. The original English text
at that time did not have this identifier, but the Chinese translation
added it:

Quote [1]:

| The SPDX identifier of this translation was added at its birth, while
| the SPDX identifier of its original English version was added this year
| 2026. Although it has been added, I'm quite curious about whether it is
| "legal" to add the identifier on top of the Chinese translation while
| the English original does not have one back in 2023.
| 
| I know Jon has been a little bit careful about it, so I'd better leave
| my thoughts here for future reference.
| 
| Thanks.

Also, I need to take a closer look at the description of this
identifier.

Ultimately, however, I agree that our top principle should be to
maintain consistency with the original text.

Thanks!

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/20260823-maintainer-pgp-guide-v2-3-bea33b2ece54@wyuan.org/