From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mta0.migadu.com (out-200.mta0.migadu.com [91.218.175.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CC60381AE4 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2026 06:24:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.200 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788848673; cv=none; b=oT2PcODM03dGmgGuB3HHmXHw0cwaeP+blz0ikA5JeqVqC2qSnERkH7dDzpo5ZSY4d9yhSXSiDfkY6A+u2dgOknQS5jGqDhx6JLlaIAFDE42T29xZkAU8MGJh0i7QWFuTxbz+MsPN8vMiIqmngMTFdHQdWxRDfS0uw25vmcV0MpQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788848673; c=relaxed/simple; bh=MBn0CE7Kymrqbq8YOgG9n11MvQW9GyGybawOGCVLhd0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=i1/gvGnxb3vbyCRjeX+4lPD2vXK5PH8j0crW3hINh4d3ccVDxQm91wyT7UT32UEsIFW6LmZ8gcaANCUci5Z/AkX9pRXegy2/1ESTUEAKgJUNWJjRC0+r7yVp9GLLl2qe7HoYlBtzturr3Nw8u5QQRGSJ1taRo5zJtYa01DEtYDk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=wyuan.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=wyuan.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=wyuan.org header.i=@wyuan.org header.b=oo2/bx5o; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.200 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=wyuan.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=wyuan.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=wyuan.org header.i=@wyuan.org header.b="oo2/bx5o" X-Envelope-To: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; bh=MBn0CE7Kymrqbq8YOgG9n11MvQW9GyGybawOGCVLhd0=; c=simple/simple; d=wyuan.org; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=key1; t=1788848669; v=1; x=1789453469; b=oo2/bx5oy1TuGPea6IYvFjuewfguuRCCJm5w1kFDgemAn+fd3O8eUODhW9G5CLUafkxTgsmf jeI+s3AEkIly0uWxYwJFuaSLyeUAzjySJqN11OIe63fRXvlaPoE6thtXkZpR0Am7VYGttLIa82P rwcf8RD0q3fKMjm76tsDNF7L25iP0uMXc2ed2ury8GGgzQCJSaHypo98O1TMzIFKAAPa5uRQZ3E /sTVxef8G/OfHPPznGsxtV4W++mq7TxTx9CGLg3zkKD6UbIaVZk+hOxy85ZaiEiOfilKvqENyap 9HpZlCcWvFlMePbi0TSFAFP4mGFI0ZuonDWIRldx2ASAw== X-Envelope-To: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Received: by smtp.migadu.com with ESMTPS id e408994e9e537c8c; Tue, 08 Sep 2026 06:24:29 +0000 X-Mizu-Trace-ID: e408994e9e537c8c X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2026 14:24:13 +0800 From: Weijie Yuan To: "zhen.ni" Cc: "Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)" , Andrew Morton , David Hildenbrand , Lorenzo Stoakes , "Liam R . Howlett" , Mike Rapoport , Suren Baghdasaryan , Michal Hocko , Jonathan Corbet , Shuah Khan , Randy Dunlap , Brendan Jackman , Johannes Weiner , Zi Yan , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] mm/page_owner: Add PID/TGID/COMM and cgroup filtering Message-ID: References: <20260903041819.1776630-1-zhen.ni@easystack.cn> <5d4c247c-b8ea-4d3f-b2b9-d442d372fd03@kernel.org> <6744bcdb-3456-4ba2-95a0-a58c354bfbfa@easystack.cn> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6744bcdb-3456-4ba2-95a0-a58c354bfbfa@easystack.cn> >From an outsider.. On Tue, Sep 08, 2026 at 10:41:23AM +0800, zhen.ni wrote: > > > > Sorry but your whole reply reads like a LLM slop. It took a lot of > > mental effor to actually try and engage with it. > > > > This reply was written by me, and its viewpoints are not simply copied > directly from an LLM. The LLM only assists with the wording. So that's probably the reason. Your previous replies was indeed very much like the output of an LLM. Even if the idea is your own, after being "polished" by LLM, it's hard to read. I know English is not our first language, and it's not that easy to speak like a native speaker. But may I ask you did you read it before sending them out? I really found this bunch of overly formal content a little painful to read. So I suspect the LLM may have taken too much liberty in polishing your text, to the point that your replies no longer read like something a person would naturally write. The "Summary and Plan" in your reply in v1, both in its formatting and wording, looks quite similar to LLM-generated text to me. So I can understand why Lorenzo asked whether you had used an LLM. Come on, we all know what LLM writing looks like. That said, I do not know exactly how you used the LLM on your original text, so please forgive me if I have this wrong. Thanks.