From: Itaru Kitayama <itaru.kitayama@fujitsu.com>
To: "Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)" <ljs@kernel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>, Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>,
Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Jack Thomson <jackabt@amazon.com>,
Jack Thomson <jackabt.amazon@gmail.com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@google.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
Leo Soares Passos <Leo.Bras@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] KVM: selftests: Add nested pre-fault test for arm64
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2026 15:30:41 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aqOgEQKBGH-YqGr3@sm-arm-grace07> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260825-kvm-arm-prefault-v1-8-befe8947702e@kernel.org>
Hi Lorenzo,
On Tue, Aug 25, 2026 at 05:00:42PM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) wrote:
> From: Jack Thomson <jackabt@amazon.com>
>
> Add an arm64 nested-virt selftest for KVM_PRE_FAULT_MEMORY. The guest
> enters vEL1 and exits to userspace with a nested/shadow stage-2 MMU as
> the vCPU's last-run context.
>
> Before prefaulting, userspace enables HCR_EL2.VM and points VTTBR_EL2 at
> an empty nested stage-2 root. A prefault implementation that incorrectly
> treats the userspace GPA as an L2 IPA will fail the ioctl; the correct
> path targets the canonical stage-2 and succeeds.
>
> Restore the original nested state before resuming the guest, then touch
> the prefaulted range to check that vEL1 still runs correctly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jack Thomson <jackabt@amazon.com>
> [ljs: partial progress, >4 KiB pgsize, commit msg, comment fixups]
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) <ljs@kernel.org>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm | 1 +
> .../selftests/kvm/arm64/nv_pre_fault_memory_test.c | 206 +++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 207 insertions(+)
I wonder whether this selftest can use functions Wei-Lin proposed
some time ago [1]: 20260325003620.2214766-1-weilin.chang@arm.com
or would you prefer this test as propose, since it is clear as
to what needs to be done to enter L2.
Thanks,
Itaru.
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm
> index 66a9a4e62888..1e0edd0f99f7 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm
> @@ -173,6 +173,7 @@ TEST_GEN_PROGS_arm64 += arm64/debug-exceptions
> TEST_GEN_PROGS_arm64 += arm64/hello_el2
> TEST_GEN_PROGS_arm64 += arm64/host_sve
> TEST_GEN_PROGS_arm64 += arm64/hypercalls
> +TEST_GEN_PROGS_arm64 += arm64/nv_pre_fault_memory_test
> TEST_GEN_PROGS_arm64 += arm64/external_aborts
> TEST_GEN_PROGS_arm64 += arm64/mmio_sign_ext
> TEST_GEN_PROGS_arm64 += arm64/page_fault_test
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/nv_pre_fault_memory_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/nv_pre_fault_memory_test.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..b3833aea2a34
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/nv_pre_fault_memory_test.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,206 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +/*
> + * nv_pre_fault_memory_test - Test KVM_PRE_FAULT_MEMORY on a vCPU whose
> + * last-run context is nested.
> + *
> + * The guest starts at vEL2, mirrors its EL2 translation regime into the
> + * real EL1 registers, drops HCR_EL2.TGE and ERETs to vEL1, then exits to
> + * userspace from vEL1 so that the vCPU's last-run context selects a
> + * shadow stage-2 MMU. Userspace then enables an empty nested stage-2
> + * before prefaulting. Prefaulting must target the canonical stage-2,
> + * regardless of the vCPU's nested state.
> + */
> +#include "kvm_util.h"
> +#include "processor.h"
> +#include "test_util.h"
> +#include "ucall.h"
> +
> +#include <asm/sysreg.h>
> +#include <linux/sizes.h>
> +
> +#define TEST_MEM_SLOT 10
> +#define NESTED_S2_ROOT_SLOT 11
> +#define TEST_MEM_SIZE SZ_2M
> +#define TEST_MEM_GPA SZ_1G
> +#define NESTED_S2_ROOT_GPA (TEST_MEM_GPA + TEST_MEM_SIZE)
> +
> +struct nested_s2_state {
> + u64 hcr_el2;
> + u64 vttbr_el2;
> +};
> +
> +static void guest_el1_code(void)
> +{
> + u64 offset;
> +
> + GUEST_ASSERT_EQ(get_current_el(), 1);
> +
> + /* Exit to userspace with the vEL1 (nested) context live. */
> + GUEST_SYNC(1);
> +
> + /*
> + * Touch the prefaulted range. vstage-2 is disabled, so the shadow
> + * stage-2 is a 1:1 view of the canonical IPA space.
> + */
> + for (offset = 0; offset < TEST_MEM_SIZE; offset += SZ_4K)
> + READ_ONCE(*(u64 *)(TEST_MEM_GPA + offset));
> +
> + GUEST_DONE();
> +}
> +
> +static void guest_code(void)
> +{
> + u64 sp;
> +
> + GUEST_ASSERT_EQ(get_current_el(), 2);
> +
> + /*
> + * Mirror the EL2 translation regime into the real EL1 registers so
> + * that vEL1 runs on the test's stage-1 page tables. With E2H=1, the
> + * _EL1 accessors read the EL2 registers, and the _EL12 accessors
> + * write the real EL1 registers.
> + */
> + write_sysreg_s(read_sysreg(sctlr_el1), SYS_SCTLR_EL12);
> + write_sysreg_s(read_sysreg(tcr_el1), SYS_TCR_EL12);
> + write_sysreg_s(read_sysreg(ttbr0_el1), SYS_TTBR0_EL12);
> + write_sysreg_s(read_sysreg(mair_el1), SYS_MAIR_EL12);
> + write_sysreg_s(read_sysreg(cpacr_el1), SYS_CPACR_EL12);
> +
> + /* Run vEL1 on the same stack. */
> + asm volatile("mov %0, sp" : "=r"(sp));
> + write_sysreg(sp, sp_el1);
> +
> + /*
> + * Drop TGE so that vEL1 is a nested context rather than host EL0.
> + * KVM backs it with a shadow stage-2 MMU even though vstage-2 is
> + * disabled (HCR_EL2.VM=0).
> + */
> + write_sysreg(read_sysreg(hcr_el2) & ~HCR_EL2_TGE, hcr_el2);
> + isb();
> +
> + write_sysreg(PSR_MODE_EL1h | PSR_F_BIT | PSR_I_BIT | PSR_A_BIT |
> + PSR_D_BIT, spsr_el2);
> + write_sysreg((u64)guest_el1_code, elr_el2);
> + asm volatile("eret");
> +
> + GUEST_ASSERT(false);
> +}
> +
> +static void pre_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 gpa, u64 size)
> +{
> + struct kvm_pre_fault_memory range = {
> + .gpa = gpa,
> + .size = size,
> + };
> + int ret;
> +
> + do {
> + ret = __vcpu_ioctl(vcpu, KVM_PRE_FAULT_MEMORY, &range);
> + } while ((!ret && range.size) ||
> + (ret < 0 && (errno == EINTR || errno == EAGAIN)));
> +
> + TEST_ASSERT(!ret, "KVM_PRE_FAULT_MEMORY failed, ret: %d errno: %d",
> + ret, errno);
> + TEST_ASSERT_EQ(range.size, 0);
> +}
> +
> +static struct nested_s2_state enable_empty_nested_s2(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + struct nested_s2_state state = {
> + .hcr_el2 = vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_HCR_EL2)),
> + .vttbr_el2 = vcpu_get_reg(vcpu,
> + KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_VTTBR_EL2)),
> + };
> +
> + TEST_ASSERT(!(state.hcr_el2 & HCR_EL2_TGE),
> + "vCPU should be in nested/vEL1 context");
> +
> + vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_VTTBR_EL2),
> + NESTED_S2_ROOT_GPA);
> + vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_HCR_EL2),
> + state.hcr_el2 | HCR_EL2_VM);
> +
> + return state;
> +}
> +
> +static void restore_nested_s2(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> + struct nested_s2_state *state)
> +{
> + vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_HCR_EL2), state->hcr_el2);
> + vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_VTTBR_EL2),
> + state->vttbr_el2);
> +}
> +
> +int main(void)
> +{
> + struct nested_s2_state s2;
> + struct kvm_vcpu_init init;
> + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
> + struct kvm_vm *vm;
> + struct ucall uc;
> + u64 npages;
> +
> + TEST_REQUIRE(kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_ARM_EL2));
> + TEST_REQUIRE(kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_PRE_FAULT_MEMORY));
> +
> + vm = vm_create(1);
> +
> + kvm_get_default_vcpu_target(vm, &init);
> + init.features[0] |= BIT(KVM_ARM_VCPU_HAS_EL2);
> + vcpu = aarch64_vcpu_add(vm, 0, &init, guest_code);
> + kvm_arch_vm_finalize_vcpus(vm);
> +
> + npages = TEST_MEM_SIZE / vm->page_size;
> + vm_userspace_mem_region_add(vm, VM_MEM_SRC_ANONYMOUS, TEST_MEM_GPA,
> + TEST_MEM_SLOT, npages, 0);
> + virt_map(vm, TEST_MEM_GPA, TEST_MEM_GPA, npages);
> +
> + vm_userspace_mem_region_add(vm, VM_MEM_SRC_ANONYMOUS,
> + NESTED_S2_ROOT_GPA, NESTED_S2_ROOT_SLOT,
> + vm_adjust_num_guest_pages(vm->mode, 1), 0);
> +
> + /* Run the guest until it has ERET'd from vEL2 to vEL1. */
> + vcpu_run(vcpu);
> + switch (get_ucall(vcpu, &uc)) {
> + case UCALL_SYNC:
> + TEST_ASSERT_EQ(uc.args[1], 1);
> + break;
> + case UCALL_ABORT:
> + REPORT_GUEST_ASSERT(uc);
> + break;
> + default:
> + TEST_FAIL("Unhandled ucall: %ld", uc.cmd);
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * The vCPU's last-run context is vEL1, backed by a shadow stage-2
> + * MMU. Enable nested stage-2 with an empty root so that the ioctl
> + * fails if it tries to interpret the userspace GPA as an L2 IPA.
> + *
> + * Prefault in two halves so that the second ioctl exercises a
> + * repeated shadow-MMU attach and canonical stage-2 swap.
> + *
> + * (Note that an implementation that wrongly populates shadow
> + * stage-2 page tables would not be caught as userland can't
> + * inspect these.)
> + */
> + s2 = enable_empty_nested_s2(vcpu);
> + pre_fault(vcpu, TEST_MEM_GPA, TEST_MEM_SIZE / 2);
> + pre_fault(vcpu, TEST_MEM_GPA + TEST_MEM_SIZE / 2, TEST_MEM_SIZE / 2);
> + restore_nested_s2(vcpu, &s2);
> +
> + /* Resume at vEL1 and touch the prefaulted range. */
> + vcpu_run(vcpu);
> + switch (get_ucall(vcpu, &uc)) {
> + case UCALL_DONE:
> + break;
> + case UCALL_ABORT:
> + REPORT_GUEST_ASSERT(uc);
> + break;
> + default:
> + TEST_FAIL("Unhandled ucall: %ld", uc.cmd);
> + }
> +
> + kvm_vm_free(vm);
> + return 0;
> +}
>
> --
> 2.55.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-11 6:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-25 16:00 [PATCH 0/8] KVM: arm64: Add KVM_PRE_FAULT_MEMORY support Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-08-25 16:00 ` [PATCH 1/8] KVM: arm64: Propagate and use esr in s2fd when handling guest aborts Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-09-10 8:39 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-09-10 9:04 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-08-25 16:00 ` [PATCH 2/8] KVM: arm64: Propagate and use mmu " Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-08-25 16:00 ` [PATCH 3/8] KVM: arm64: Propagate and use kvm_s2_fault_result on S2 fault Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-09-10 8:49 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-09-10 9:00 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-08-25 16:00 ` [PATCH 4/8] KVM: arm64: Pass walk flags to kvm_pgtable_get_leaf() Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-08-25 16:00 ` [PATCH 5/8] KVM: arm64: Implement KVM_PRE_FAULT_MEMORY Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-09-10 10:02 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-09-10 15:32 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-08-25 16:00 ` [PATCH 6/8] KVM: selftests: Enable pre_fault_memory_test for arm64 Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-09-10 18:52 ` Fuad Tabba
2026-08-25 16:00 ` [PATCH 7/8] KVM: selftests: Add option for different backing in pre-fault tests Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-08-25 16:00 ` [PATCH 8/8] KVM: selftests: Add nested pre-fault test for arm64 Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-09-10 18:57 ` Fuad Tabba
2026-09-11 9:21 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-09-11 6:30 ` Itaru Kitayama [this message]
2026-09-11 9:32 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-09-11 12:42 ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-09-11 15:44 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-09-10 18:44 ` [PATCH 0/8] KVM: arm64: Add KVM_PRE_FAULT_MEMORY support Fuad Tabba
2026-09-11 9:16 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aqOgEQKBGH-YqGr3@sm-arm-grace07 \
--to=itaru.kitayama@fujitsu.com \
--cc=Leo.Bras@arm.com \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jackabt.amazon@gmail.com \
--cc=jackabt@amazon.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=vdonnefort@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox