From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wm2-f13.google.com (mail-wm2-f13.google.com [74.125.225.141]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E84AE52B1DE for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2026 15:43:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=74.125.225.141 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789573384; cv=none; b=hptbTFYhYwJKPQ9iWna+pe63W16e0/RY4N/9QhxjOxP94/RC0G6KlPIgvWPT7b8TLz6D8ZsPtbxWlgBxSxuZq9CpJBLZIVKbpxo6qNftCWQYO4qtfOQMbU+hx/b50kw84BDRcFRebxGxn2DHtNa3dItx0k6eupwRQalaC6cE+o8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789573384; c=relaxed/simple; bh=xzkEs5LiSja3dbzzicR21Qn0XTrKAUdE1PB/NwOkDos=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=tDsNPkzTRRqeFNNxCAJqtrYR8UVGPOWI2N3uNLLOnzhyafbi94UG2ZlDXISjrpm3VDng1o/xLWWSJzT23HGkowgwTJtLeOBGlJ0oaiPFHRylenAY7EHm7wUJoJpEqC9fPM6heBj0Z1dVbAO45Xk/YuApMMjZnsJJxARs36G4LQM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=google.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b=Kod5TDBu; arc=none smtp.client-ip=74.125.225.141 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="Kod5TDBu" Received: by mail-wm2-f13.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-49d1fb0cf5eso8336275e9.3 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2026 08:43:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20251104; t=1789573380; x=1790178180; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :content-type:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from :date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=6Sim/Uq2bss990wMC5LOqQrIp+Z1Yp2vLh2aHVXHuME=; b=Kod5TDBumB6ymIwo7H/RjtjtrnCuDomtfuR8A8HGXpN9zgO1n4IyBkl3igGXu+7HOs zw27PQMKllXoPTSLu/HpagKlvd8CU2+NFGHJiZ2WyfdcqLz31yTLCw7AVgVcp/IYfVbS I1Xlt7B7YltXwZ+O7fBbgLEprxlZ4BCPNCxrn3IRJudknDVfer8wPbaz5xom4wVVpNSL LHRQSL7U4jIQQm+VrlVv4qjOU1i3lYzkhhb76vIkfawkePesgPYnJBAcsLVs2B0IHc7o eavU318LnTyYFVlk/KW38KOB3d93So/91Lwn4vbIy35Ivb0es/onxLKICAcyvHkNdNk/ IIlw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20260707; t=1789573380; x=1790178180; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :content-type:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from :date:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to:content-type; bh=6Sim/Uq2bss990wMC5LOqQrIp+Z1Yp2vLh2aHVXHuME=; b=Cs1OpvoP8PZe38BpdG7n+elj+O9uVqAa+4u9k131AEMRdp8qhKrdAnrcTlif/wN39w pdWcGLZxARgJ4nRMRipn13QZJvhR/8GY7YrrqwSH05bqDYqiZu90qWvZ1rzyHvi/rKCt d0SKniwOU+hqogUPfPy+q/AEnqWtBGEY/wLJtmFBvTFbbOL+6TWFprI4goVGRcxDJ/gi CzSR3zr0cPka6veVrPF/Fj0zZsujVyJvekvfoBUcnxwtNWTrG0QNaWMW9Ud8pSD1c7qk CIOAFKashw5olwdKhndH/Xl7VGbzgGC/j4IbPo5CImF9UdREzamOzE+kfovAn1nqje2F 1ZxQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AKwUvBxakMTmX/6saS6BvqrujFTJFS9NA376osFmysQXxbKGxl60bpoic/QdbAJFyLMepbnYzEg8BzcE714=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AFuF++mWEaNnBp+nIxeiPbdYFQSLS/9CU0S+iya6hA6uZXqdsudpJNJx 4IBUK2p1FEON5k8zSwckYbVqFC3QOvgwZZeo/drEgJJZmy6PmUJ8emMdFsbsJqeWRg== X-Gm-Gg: AYBFou2qqp0v5O74YeL6ceGHOQDppKEhdVkcciNKY8jMqSg8MbVhJ9kYfor633l+AqQ 0GuQz0Fwyihxn+zDOSrJMv8QmnCYJSSVknuzcb79vNhc3IsK1OYHLf/SeM4bzWLPAMBS7tzZqpP zk1iRU07lfP6TZyjILXWs6NJg/BcQcsoZdVKkaqngtQZ+QCTRhc0sS7AuHUiWaARxv5UHqPazGs EBbRRpgp+XwJdiiHZF4SVA72fyM7b8OrDsUfVCGe9a4DITAs6B4bHnVexwyjB2fIVs8NEk9xrbv Ofr646BG7D8E2T+HZMuMydpTP41Jk7IqTy+i5zYI5r3rRS6V0KNvif9UPxFLPMC7ldKzne7bznf MNj2OOsg3OvThT3s8BkHEL59teVWZNTqWmHq6SXrth4NKm6WZnsGsD9mn3kh64sj1HXtKL7wvbV a7RF/RlgLNTK4jaPndRvwZMYUf8wV7VsRIkfMBBsg7Yzhz+nzguVjqZ+Gu/bGivE0J7HYoiuDoC MM/2hiB5JnnHmd9jJ1JsPGnS2jyqZRGUw9KXRk= X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:5489:b0:49c:cee0:e7c1 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-49eb7340a28mr62591055e9.16.1789573378755; Wed, 16 Sep 2026 08:42:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from google.com ([2a00:79e0:288a:8:a430:d4f:f001:4a5d]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-4870bf27198sm7580265f8f.15.2026.09.16.08.42.58 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 16 Sep 2026 08:42:58 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2026 17:42:53 +0200 From: =?utf-8?Q?G=C3=BCnther?= Noack To: Christopher Lusk Cc: =?utf-8?Q?Micka=C3=ABl_Sala=C3=BCn?= , Jonathan Corbet , Shuah Khan , Randy Dunlap , linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: landlock: clarify TTY signal scoping Message-ID: References: <20260914.b8a029f9abb8@gnoack.org> <20260914180946.1462099-1-clusk@northecho.dev> <20260916145255.1587381-1-clusk@northecho.dev> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20260916145255.1587381-1-clusk@northecho.dev> On Wed, Sep 16, 2026 at 10:52:55AM -0400, Christopher Lusk wrote: > Hello Günther, > > Thank you for the careful review. > > The phrase "or otherwise driving a terminal" was LLM over-generalization, > not a separate mechanism. I checked the paths I had in mind against the > source, and none justifies that broader wording. I am dropping it. Thanks for double checking the wording, sounds good. > You are also right about the verbosity. The generated text expanded a > two-line distinction into 15 lines and obscured the main point. I will use > your suggested sentence and remove the signal enumeration. I do not have a > stable kernel documentation URL for that list, so I will not add a citation. > > v2 will contain your sentence and a short LANDLOCK_SCOPE_SIGNAL remark in > landlock.h, matched to the recent MAKE_REG whiteout remark. I will post it > as a new top-level patch with a Link back to this discussion. > > I will keep the positive selftest you suggested as a separate follow-up so > the documentation clarification can be reviewed independently. Sounds good as well. —Günther