From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CEDEA4E4300; Tue, 13 Oct 2026 13:07:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791896854; cv=none; b=e3vzAlZfZasp2w2B32r3i05Cgp6DsfXiZ7nqlY6u7jjVFtKR35O0Im4f6SUAdoAW1ZCes7iPx+xpvMKsQHa4Wtr2xnG4Ks+mguhRSTnWfBVtr6a+Qoql5zRZFIJEOe9PYZ1AD6dQGM/59Bh35JzMKuc/CFM5jLLukrxSTnl2lJg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791896854; c=relaxed/simple; bh=yImSNxOm/mWbtqz9ywKlBX/h2PudPleXwHqT+dJ9zbU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=gH3M+Gcva4Pzr5+2zvbqf/k7DNPNn4NfAfEWsVt/TTZDGEyu6O0wUMphsjTTNXGeICy138p3GkY4aFxcncUXBdJLiEF7fKxbEbCDFbG+P0n98qWRBU3nWq6jZ50hLRuRjN7S0o1VgyCxWQ17yN8Pqg2UBrnm1i+s7SyVNSZk4u0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=VyL13qCx; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="VyL13qCx" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3D8781F000FF; Tue, 13 Oct 2026 13:07:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1791896853; bh=yImSNxOm/mWbtqz9ywKlBX/h2PudPleXwHqT+dJ9zbU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=VyL13qCxx9F2GYIRkXtrA9S7hxfWu2gvZLmfVAv19+7tgf/LcbAKvYytFY/mqqKdU yQiolGVDVWbwo6a3Relx0Yd3NMHDWq5/iSurASE5PKnx2quHV2XeRJwUSfTAmLKwqF 8+3PQI7xaPWZUjR8iuXJ/nJAefexMWTBBIVKf1SKdwqFWM4FrHgMYuVGUDmAL5fCIH vzmTL3l/Wvpgn85uli7Wleo3EFQQaGklxG5Etijn5iltmCLquar+TjI1Pn3MVgb8eJ TFSvwhUoSi/+FJki4HB8lNn6XBWy8YChmUq4ak8+L80ebhe20f/ep114hLA/emvM9X Rdd0WbkrbY7fA== Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2026 14:07:24 +0100 From: "Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)" To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: Laurent Pinchart , Sasha Levin , corbet@lwn.net, skhan@linuxfoundation.org, rdunlap@infradead.org, federico.vaga@vaga.pv.it, apw@canonical.com, joe@perches.com, workflows@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , Linus Torvalds , Justin Stitt , Carlos Maiolino , Jakub Kicinski , Jori Koolstra , Brian Foster , Christoph Hellwig , David Disseldorp , Mark Brown , Jani Nikula , Jens Axboe , "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" , Vlastimil Babka , "Christian Brauner (Amutable)" Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: remove Assisted-by references Message-ID: References: <20261009083137.3-1-sashal@kernel.org> <0914a106-bacf-4d95-854a-bfeefbff62a4@kernel.org> <20261013123132.GC4214@killaraus.ideasonboard.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Tue, Oct 13, 2026 at 03:04:11PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 13/10/2026 14:59, Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) wrote: > > Ignoring is the only workable long-term solution. > > That was also mentioned by a few people according to Jon's report on LWN: > https://lwn.net/Articles/1099594/ Good, it's a relief for me, because I worried there was a lack of emphasis on the asymmetry, and I'm very glad to be proven wrong! :) (I did scan the article, will read it properly when I have a moment.) > > and I think I could agree with that "ignore". IOW, we should change the > contract offer we give to people (see Greg's commitment in "I don't want > your code": "Review your patch within 1-2 weeks") to "if I suspect LLM > waste of my time, I might never respond". Yeah, it'd be nice to formalise it in a document somewhere, but Linus saying so is enough in general I think. -- Cheers, Lorenzo