From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F194D3F1077; Tue, 13 Oct 2026 13:09:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.9 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791896964; cv=none; b=sZ5M1qWoxAd3IFqNR5ltXlGrCaD6QVptPGH2v6N71MEP3Gxeq0rAXxgqEJzm4gtf+wR/Gc5xRhx2BrpHV0yHnzi4OFOteUsMofP7bzJ97PT65ZZ/5wq3HepycPxttZn9b94lxK3tboncxZAltZ1VWiRCR5KD90tgtLaBuEVIJlc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791896964; c=relaxed/simple; bh=UpLDrnSBhRg6iXoSIzOWUiTrJH1KftLjMwLndDqjc5g=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=XiHW8k60au/40grs4FzOpk3qtizKFBJnllmGMzF1AhQzmX9dk84CvRGbRgv1Uv+mnIxkAEsk1etoVfRi+yojYMlOsnHCV74i4lxLroR2HUzP3POARvUDh/rnN7C2nnc6Wahs9KdvKryytepUgEZ/2s83QbqIK2e27OxdNcQoh7o= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=CBBJRMHs; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.9 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="CBBJRMHs" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1791896964; x=1823432964; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=UpLDrnSBhRg6iXoSIzOWUiTrJH1KftLjMwLndDqjc5g=; b=CBBJRMHs0auIPkZWo6VOF7xjbLLBzq9VWv31I+VUkwRN/st70qamHeRn Sf5Pb1jCeozpNJAMGp5NZYOYk3YEuTjEqIB2DrGYTKDcLFXw2/WT8qlqL 1EPlO5oQlqTCCFU5TlS05X2WGkzDPVft1slqrx8PieZ9vNcvMbJeT9zud RclhS7oeItwg/RNcjUy6B6jE0lx724EOX/5FDSg9XP2ohbfCfs34Qy3Rn hpP4zBOfI0rj9nt2j4bXpvMFqi0EG+1KXBVEjWBP4Mf/aDvXGVIjCra/3 uOQLfArcxfDti7qN0SR8uWnxgnXBsftmKv/e49g1sor4mBKJy2IyJ1oGR g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: Nd8VW3g5RES3cUnYDU0AOQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: LC/fuKMIQeGjj+3hmxNzew== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11933"; a="505934" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.27,155,1787036400"; d="scan'208";a="505934" Received: from fmviesa002.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.142]) by orvoesa101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Oct 2026 06:09:22 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: oYbbfUsLQUuknHb9gH/1MQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: UOJ0k6MYQCCqCp2CcQRkoQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.27,155,1787036400"; d="scan'208";a="1269436" Received: from ncintean-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.245.48]) by smtpauth.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Oct 2026 06:09:18 -0700 Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2026 16:09:14 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Linus Walleij Cc: Bradford Love , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, Bartosz Golaszewski , Jonathan Corbet , Shuah Khan , Daniel Mack , Haojian Zhuang , Robert Jarzmik , Russell King , Hauke Mehrtens , =?utf-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= , Thomas Bogendoerfer , Mauro Carvalho Chehab Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/7] gpiolib: kill gpio_request_one() Message-ID: References: <20260715185112.1323510-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Fri, Jul 24, 2026 at 11:40:59PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Wed, Jul 15, 2026 at 8:51 PM Andy Shevchenko > wrote: > > > This is the finilazation of the work announced in the commit 61e1fd2abca4 > > ("gpiolib: legacy: Make sure we kill gpio_request_one() first"). With this > > small series we kill gpio_request_one() and leave only two legacy calls > > devm_gpio_request_one() and gpio_request(), where the managed one has only > > a few users and high chances to be killed soon as well. > > > > The series is supposed to go via GPIO tree (due to nature of the last patch) > > with possible immutable branch for others. Please, ack. > > The kernel is clearly a better place after these patches than before it, so: > Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij Thanks! Bart, anything needs to be done for this series to go in? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko