From: Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>
To: Li Zhe <lizhe.67@bytedance.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@kernel.org, ljs@kernel.org,
joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com, ziy@nvidia.com, mingo@redhat.com,
peterz@infradead.org, mgorman@suse.de, riel@redhat.com,
juri.lelli@redhat.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
bsegall@google.com, vschneid@redhat.com, kprateek.nayak@amd.com,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] sched/numa: fix scan-period ratio denominator checks
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2026 08:56:28 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <as97rD5uxYva4ayg@gourry-fedora-PF4VCD3F> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261014094347.99157-3-lizhe.67@bytedance.com>
On Wed, Oct 14, 2026 at 05:43:43PM +0800, Li Zhe wrote:
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 1053437933ee..76532b8202dc 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -3698,6 +3698,8 @@ static void update_task_scan_period(struct task_struct *p,
>
> unsigned long remote = p->numa_faults_locality[0];
> unsigned long local = p->numa_faults_locality[1];
> + unsigned long locality_faults = local + remote;
> + unsigned long type_faults = private + shared;
>
> /*
> * If there were no record hinting faults then either the task is
> @@ -3706,7 +3708,7 @@ static void update_task_scan_period(struct task_struct *p,
> * migration then it implies we are migrating too quickly or the local
> * node is overloaded. In either case, scan slower
> */
> - if (local + shared == 0 || p->numa_faults_locality[2]) {
> + if (!locality_faults || !type_faults || p->numa_faults_locality[2]) {
> p->numa_scan_period = min(p->numa_scan_period_max,
> p->numa_scan_period << 1);
>
This does more than just change the div/o below, it changes the behavior
of the function overall. It's not clear to me this change is correct.
> @@ -3723,8 +3725,8 @@ static void update_task_scan_period(struct task_struct *p,
> * >= NUMA_PERIOD_THRESHOLD scan period increases (scan slower)
> */
> period_slot = DIV_ROUND_UP(p->numa_scan_period, NUMA_PERIOD_SLOTS);
> - lr_ratio = (local * NUMA_PERIOD_SLOTS) / (local + remote);
> - ps_ratio = (private * NUMA_PERIOD_SLOTS) / (private + shared);
> + lr_ratio = (local * NUMA_PERIOD_SLOTS) / locality_faults;
> + ps_ratio = (private * NUMA_PERIOD_SLOTS) / type_faults;
>
This otherwise looks fine.
~Gregory
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-14 12:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-14 9:43 [PATCH 0/6] sched/numa: fix several NUMA balancing issues Li Zhe
2026-10-14 9:43 ` [PATCH 1/6] sched/numa: clear fault locality state on execve Li Zhe
2026-10-14 13:02 ` Gregory Price
2026-10-14 9:43 ` [PATCH 2/6] sched/numa: fix scan-period ratio denominator checks Li Zhe
2026-10-14 12:56 ` Gregory Price [this message]
2026-10-14 9:43 ` [PATCH 3/6] sched/numa: fix scan-period adjustment for shared faults Li Zhe
2026-10-14 13:12 ` Gregory Price
2026-10-14 9:43 ` [PATCH 4/6] sched/numa: make free-space tiering promotion bypass configurable Li Zhe
2026-10-14 13:16 ` Gregory Price
2026-10-14 9:43 ` [PATCH 5/6] sched/numa: do not feed tiering promotions into task placement stats Li Zhe
2026-10-14 13:26 ` Gregory Price
2026-10-14 9:43 ` [PATCH 6/6] sched/numa: ignore preferred nodes without normal balancing Li Zhe
2026-10-14 13:30 ` Gregory Price
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=as97rD5uxYva4ayg@gourry-fedora-PF4VCD3F \
--to=gourry@gourry.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lizhe.67@bytedance.com \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox