From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=91.218.175.32 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1792508272; b=gLbpC4kGrNSAdCnB9i0rrb+Sbs4R/mMUjDqBLGGFDOzAIpDy1RBW9zmOaIzYOCeGm9iP 422bmc2vs73e5JBf2Izs43pn0GUtfm9tSgH1y+6LuFWQAqYJk7memnzxHra5YQqWQX/1q ncHwQYydKnBhlPz5tzgihxijI2tPSIDGiqB42aQ04kkAiuXCrHA6W56TU+Ih597Sp29OT PONNaoxWlgHNIhrSvrCACdvIlnynq5R0ucrdue6MoJ+0jmEC73BnaEJN6sG0XThqzBsZn RuNf9LpdE/g204XwsjxBeh2DyRLBCc5zJMM6fOBO+zy284kj9AdPuxQIM4/o7Lxv2Uw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1792508272; h=DMARC-Filter:X-Envelope-To:DKIM-Signature:X-Envelope-To:Received: X-Mizu-Trace-ID:X-Migadu-Flow:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID: References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; bh=npNbn/zUqvs8APILcGcY/6iaNnpBHEF2ZDFPVoYA5ZM=; b=E/Q7t0Dn/zomiFfrS2KHWmFn4EgSS+qBezq21OJv4/I6kMksB3YkVenWGqCGvZEnKYME qAuhggfKAJe0LCEusNM8eByLAcGRtV+IrBuwTgOYPGxYycgTPwLNfx7wXSXTHUrrRqRGU X41WdqCHi/VPupsCERhbUsakit4YYYuujGERfRlW2MIZhEDF8iTZ39AqueyjeVHkAKTm1 jGUmdcai9o1bGjjn+R+UPJjrGIhu6jDtwyAW7gUVKhrcz2l6HDmKG0vJM+uv8mmbKhFTM F252fjb0JQKs37BvgeWmCLzGBngRWO8FZfue4P/10MzvDp7VSf08IhZG2ZpobJBoaOA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass header.from=wyuan.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=wyuan.org; dkim=pass header.d=wyuan.org header.i=@wyuan.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=key1 header.b=xQPelZPj; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=91.218.175.32 Received: from mta0.migadu.com (out-32.mta0.migadu.com [91.218.175.32]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F065606A31A for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2026 14:57:50 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 smtp.subspace.kernel.org 6F065606A31A Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=wyuan.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=wyuan.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=wyuan.org header.i=@wyuan.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=key1 header.b=xQPelZPj X-Envelope-To: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; bh=De5buFFm/5fTyVWoC5qqnB2WSV4nsavYX00IngQ4YDE=; c=simple/simple; d=wyuan.org; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=key1; t=1792508269; v=1; x=1793113069; b=xQPelZPjdQyyFAt5sD8iyxLj32qKV8ullFG+80D4HnYT8vtA7UDGnTyJtwl87u8vKOQ/bZC3 w3QSgjkQZFPS3rWcHbXKfWAHhsemqKShZjIX9ZcW7JKtJSOY+YEQQbk+etcPV0sLitE2jCK44Ku +0bc63T7Th0XvKcM1GuWCkC3xp4WN5aIueedVZaeCVoVA5v0ZG4xhEFrtrHfbqvMU4/VurofwFP FQykFB0tFzFmH3TPTsdg1CBE8eiLNRStaPAPfmxpbAbjK5tReQWvT9+H6u8E4joIWAg850AZ88p T3zNuHaDCpc8EsquXltZYYYbzRtOzc1AgCd8/mROQoaXg== X-Envelope-To: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Received: by smtp.migadu.com with ESMTPS id 097e3e13253d0852; Tue, 20 Oct 2026 14:57:49 +0000 X-Mizu-Trace-ID: 097e3e13253d0852 X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2026 22:57:45 +0800 From: Weijie Yuan To: "wpeterYY@outlook.com" Cc: "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" , "alexs@kernel.org" , "si.yanteng@linux.dev" , "dzm91@hust.edu.cn" Subject: Re: =?utf-8?B?5Zue5aSNOiDlm57lpI06IFtQQVRD?= =?utf-8?Q?H?= v2 0/5] docs/zh_CN: add fault-injection Chinese translations Message-ID: References: X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Hi, On Tue, Oct 20, 2026 at 11:40:54AM +0000, wpeterYY@outlook.com wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks a lot for testing the series with b4 - that was very helpful. > > To clarify two points: > > 1) The "missing [2/5]..[5/5]" warnings are because the patches were > sent as separate (unthreaded) emails, so b4 can only assemble the > full series when pointed at the cover-letter URL. I'll resend v3 > properly threaded so a single `b4 shazam ` grabs all 5. Yes. I saw your explanation below. > > 2) The [1/5] failure is a real base-drift issue: I generated the series > against an older index.rst, and docs-mw has since changed. The patch > content itself is intact (DKIM signed, and [2/5] applied cleanly on > your tree), so it's not an Outlook corruption problem. Oh, I should have taken the time to take a look carefully first, because I originally thought there were no conflicts in the modified content between the two branches. > I'll rebase onto docs-mw and resend as v3 shortly. Ah, sorry for misleading. I used docs-mw is just because I happened to be on that branch. But actually we want to make our work based on Alex's docs-next branch. Thanks for your reply!