Linux Documentation
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leonardo Bras <leo.bras@arm.com>
To: Tian Zheng <zhengtian10@huawei.com>
Cc: Leonardo Bras <leo.bras@arm.com>,
	maz@kernel.org, oupton@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	will@kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net, pbonzini@redhat.com,
	yuzenghui@huawei.com, wangzhou1@hisilicon.com,
	yangjinqian1@huawei.com, caijian11@h-partners.com,
	liuyonglong@huawei.com, tangchengchang@huawei.com,
	yezhenyu2@huawei.com, yubihong@huawei.com, linuxarm@huawei.com,
	joey.gouly@arm.com, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, seiden@linux.ibm.com,
	suzuki.poulose@arm.com, fuad.tabba@linux.dev,
	mark.rutland@arm.com, seanjc@google.com, rdunlap@infradead.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	skhan@linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 08/15] KVM: arm64: Flush the HDBSS buffer on VM exit
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2026 18:13:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <auDpyRNpeDNzIk3W@LeoBrasDK> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260929103655.85107-9-zhengtian10@huawei.com>

On Tue, Sep 29, 2026 at 06:36:48PM +0800, Tian Zheng wrote:
> From: Eillon <yezhenyu2@huawei.com>
> 
> HDBSS entries accumulate in the per-vCPU buffer while the guest runs,
> and must be drained into the dirty bitmap or dirty ring before
> userspace can observe them.
> 
> Drain the buffer at a single point: kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run() flushes
> it on every VM exit, before the exit reason is handled. Flushing
> inside the run loop keeps the dirty-ring feedback timely: when a flush
> pushes the ring past its soft limit, kvm_dirty_ring_push() raises
> KVM_REQ_DIRTY_RING_SOFT_FULL, which check_vcpu_requests() observes at
> the top of the next loop iteration, so the vCPU exits to userspace for
> the harvest before re-entering the guest.
> 
> kvm_arch_sync_dirty_log() relies on the exit path to flush: it kicks
> vCPUs out of guest mode, and the GET/CLEAR protocol tolerates
> concurrent bitmap writes, so the snapshot is complete without extra
> synchronization.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eillon <yezhenyu2@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tian Zheng <zhengtian10@huawei.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_dirty_bit.h | 15 +++++++++
>  arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c                   | 20 ++++++++++++
>  arch/arm64/kvm/dirty_bit.c             | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 80 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_dirty_bit.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_dirty_bit.h
> index fe703f02626b..d828e6b43fe9 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_dirty_bit.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_dirty_bit.h
> @@ -13,6 +13,9 @@
>  #include <asm/sysreg.h>
>  #include <linux/sizes.h>
> 
> +#define HDBSS_ENTRY_VALID	BIT(0)
> +#define HDBSS_ENTRY_IPA	GENMASK_ULL(55, 12)
> +
>  #define KVM_ARM_HDBSS_DEFAULT_SIZE  PAGE_SIZE
>  #define KVM_ARM_HDBSS_MAX_SIZE      SZ_2M
> 
> @@ -22,7 +25,19 @@ static inline u32 kvm_hdbss_buffer_size(struct kvm *kvm)
>  	return kvm->arch.hdbss_buffer_size ?: KVM_ARM_HDBSS_DEFAULT_SIZE;
>  }
> 
> +static inline bool kvm_hdbss_enabled(struct kvm *kvm)
> +{
> +	return kvm->arch.mmu.vtcr & VTCR_EL2_HDBSS;
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool vcpu_hdbss_enabled(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +	return vcpu->arch.hw_mmu &&
> +		(vcpu->arch.hw_mmu->vtcr & VTCR_EL2_HDBSS);
> +}
> +

IIUC, arch.mmu is always the canonical s2_mmu, while hw_mmu can be the 
nested s2_mmu, if enabled.

Was that your intend here?
If not, we could use only kvm* version, which can be called with vcpu->kvm.

If it was, then I would like to understand the logic here, as IIUC the 
buffer is accessible only for the non-nested guest, as it's 
allocated in a per-vcpu structure. (vcpu->arch)

>  int kvm_arm_vcpu_alloc_hdbss(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  void kvm_arm_vcpu_free_hdbss(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> +void kvm_flush_hdbss_buffer(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> 
>  #endif /* __ARM64_KVM_DIRTY_BIT_H__ */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> index 5ea4ac26995e..9d7bdece149a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> @@ -1430,6 +1430,14 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> 
>  		trace_kvm_exit(ret, kvm_vcpu_trap_get_class(vcpu), *vcpu_pc(vcpu));
> 
> +		/*
> +		 * Drain the HDBSS buffer before the exit is handled, so
> +		 * entries pushed to the dirty ring are accounted for by
> +		 * dirty_ring_check_request() on the next iteration.
> +		 */
> +		if (vcpu_hdbss_enabled(vcpu))
> +			kvm_flush_hdbss_buffer(vcpu);
> +
>  		/* Exit types that need handling before we can be preempted */
>  		handle_exit_early(vcpu, ret);
> 


looks the correct place, haven't looked too much on that, though.


> @@ -2017,7 +2025,19 @@ long kvm_arch_vcpu_unlocked_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int ioctl,
> 
>  void kvm_arch_sync_dirty_log(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot)
>  {
> +	unsigned long i;
> +	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
> 
> +	if (!kvm_hdbss_enabled(kvm))
> +		return;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * The buffer is drained on every VM exit, so kicking running
> +	 * vCPUs is enough to flush them; the dirty-log GET/CLEAR
> +	 * protocol tolerates bits set concurrently with the snapshot.
> +	 */
> +	kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm)
> +		kvm_vcpu_kick(vcpu);
>  }
> 
>  static int kvm_vm_ioctl_set_device_addr(struct kvm *kvm,
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/dirty_bit.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/dirty_bit.c
> index f9aeb9f34ad0..be0d12555c84 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/dirty_bit.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/dirty_bit.c
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
>  #include <linux/kconfig.h>
>  #include <linux/log2.h>
>  #include <linux/mm.h>
> +#include <linux/srcu.h>
> 

Out of curiosity, could you please explain you reasoning on selecting srcu 
as locking here? 

(Like, what are you protecting against, and why srcu is a good choice)

>  int kvm_arm_vcpu_alloc_hdbss(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
> @@ -53,3 +54,47 @@ void kvm_arm_vcpu_free_hdbss(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	vcpu->arch.hdbss.hdbss_pg = NULL;
>  	vcpu->arch.hdbss.hdbssbr_el2 = 0;
>  }
> +
> +void kvm_flush_hdbss_buffer(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +	int idx, curr_idx;
> +	u64 prod;
> +	u32 entries;
> +	u64 *hdbss_buf;
> +	struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm;
> +	int srcu_idx;
> +
> +	if (!vcpu_hdbss_enabled(vcpu))
> +		return;

You test this before calling, is it really necessary to test it again, just 
after calling?

> +
> +	prod = read_sysreg_s(SYS_HDBSSPROD_EL2);
> +	curr_idx = HDBSSPROD_IDX(prod);
> +
> +	if (curr_idx == 0 || !vcpu->arch.hdbss.hdbss_pg)
> +		return;
> +
> +	hdbss_buf = page_address(vcpu->arch.hdbss.hdbss_pg);
> +	if (!hdbss_buf)
> +		return;
> +
> +	entries = kvm_hdbss_buffer_size(kvm) / sizeof(u64);
> +
> +	/* kvm_vcpu_mark_page_dirty() resolves the memslot under SRCU. */
> +	srcu_idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->srcu);
> +	for (idx = 0; idx < min_t(u32, curr_idx, entries); idx++) {
> +		u64 gpa;
> +
> +		gpa = hdbss_buf[idx];
> +		if (!(gpa & HDBSS_ENTRY_VALID))
> +			continue;
> +
> +		gpa &= HDBSS_ENTRY_IPA;
> +		kvm_vcpu_mark_page_dirty(vcpu, gpa >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> +	}
> +	srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, srcu_idx);
> +
> +	prod &= ~HDBSSPROD_EL2_INDEX_MASK;
> +	write_sysreg_s(prod, SYS_HDBSSPROD_EL2);
> +	vcpu->arch.hdbss.hdbssprod_el2 = prod;
> +	isb();
> +}
> --
> 2.43.0
> 


Thanks!
Leo


  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-27 18:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-29 10:36 [PATCH v5 00/15] KVM: arm64: FEAT_HDBSS support for stage-2 dirty tracking Tian Zheng
2026-09-29 10:36 ` [PATCH v5 01/15] KVM: arm64: pgtables: Change write bit from S2AP_W to DBM Tian Zheng
2026-09-30  0:25   ` Oliver Upton
2026-09-30  2:44     ` Tian Zheng
2026-10-26 15:02       ` Leonardo Bras
2026-09-29 10:36 ` [PATCH v5 02/15] KVM: arm64: Add KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_DIRTY Tian Zheng
2026-09-30  0:35   ` Oliver Upton
2026-09-30  2:57     ` Tian Zheng
2026-09-29 10:36 ` [PATCH v5 03/15] KVM: arm64: Introduce a dedicated walker for stage2 write-protect Tian Zheng
2026-09-29 10:36 ` [PATCH v5 04/15] KVM: arm64: Add KVM_REQ_RELOAD_STAGE2 Tian Zheng
2026-09-29 10:36 ` [PATCH v5 05/15] KVM: arm64: Harvest stage-2 dirty state into the host folio account Tian Zheng
2026-10-26 18:05   ` Leonardo Bras
2026-09-29 10:36 ` [PATCH v5 06/15] KVM: arm64: Add support for FEAT_HDBSS Tian Zheng
2026-10-26 18:12   ` Leonardo Bras
2026-09-29 10:36 ` [PATCH v5 07/15] KVM: arm64: Add HDBSS per-vCPU buffer management Tian Zheng
2026-10-26 18:27   ` Leonardo Bras
2026-09-29 10:36 ` [PATCH v5 08/15] KVM: arm64: Flush the HDBSS buffer on VM exit Tian Zheng
2026-10-27 18:13   ` Leonardo Bras [this message]
2026-09-29 10:36 ` [PATCH v5 09/15] KVM: arm64: Handle HDBSS faults Tian Zheng
2026-09-29 10:36 ` [PATCH v5 10/15] KVM: Add kvm_arch_dirty_ring_size_updated() hook Tian Zheng
2026-09-29 10:36 ` [PATCH v5 11/15] KVM: arm64: Reserve dirty ring space for the HDBSS buffer Tian Zheng
2026-09-29 10:36 ` [PATCH v5 12/15] KVM: arm64: Derive the VM hardware dirty mode from dirty logging Tian Zheng
2026-09-29 10:36 ` [PATCH v5 13/15] KVM: arm64: Add HDBSS buffer size ioctl for dirty-bitmap mode Tian Zheng
2026-09-29 10:36 ` [PATCH v5 14/15] KVM: arm64: Document HDBSS buffer size ioctl Tian Zheng
2026-09-29 10:36 ` [PATCH v5 15/15] KVM: arm64: selftests: Add HDBSS buffer size ioctl interface test Tian Zheng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=auDpyRNpeDNzIk3W@LeoBrasDK \
    --to=leo.bras@arm.com \
    --cc=caijian11@h-partners.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=fuad.tabba@linux.dev \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
    --cc=liuyonglong@huawei.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oupton@kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=tangchengchang@huawei.com \
    --cc=wangzhou1@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yangjinqian1@huawei.com \
    --cc=yezhenyu2@huawei.com \
    --cc=yubihong@huawei.com \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    --cc=zhengtian10@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox