From: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
To: Nico Pache <npache@redhat.com>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, corbet@lwn.net, rostedt@goodmis.org,
mhiramat@kernel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
david@redhat.com, baohua@kernel.org, ryan.roberts@arm.com,
willy@infradead.org, peterx@redhat.com, ziy@nvidia.com,
wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com, usamaarif642@gmail.com,
sunnanyong@huawei.com, vishal.moola@gmail.com,
thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com, yang@os.amperecomputing.com,
kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, aarcange@redhat.com,
raquini@redhat.com, anshuman.khandual@arm.com,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, tiwai@suse.de, will@kernel.org,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, jack@suse.cz, cl@gentwo.org,
jglisse@google.com, surenb@google.com, zokeefe@google.com,
hannes@cmpxchg.org, rientjes@google.com, mhocko@suse.com,
rdunlap@infradead.org, lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com,
Liam.Howlett@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 06/12] khugepaged: introduce khugepaged_scan_bitmap for mTHP support
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2025 22:07:28 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b2e0b383-d28f-436e-a83c-ab58b0eae995@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA1CXcDWX7zsW03Wwg_OHRhJ2nrt6OaLd5bn8ccX0StoN1kGUQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 01/05/25 12:26 am, Nico Pache wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 4:08 AM Baolin Wang
> <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2025/4/29 02:12, Nico Pache wrote:
>>> khugepaged scans anons PMD ranges for potential collapse to a hugepage.
>>> To add mTHP support we use this scan to instead record chunks of utilized
>>> sections of the PMD.
>>>
>>> khugepaged_scan_bitmap uses a stack struct to recursively scan a bitmap
>>> that represents chunks of utilized regions. We can then determine what
>>> mTHP size fits best and in the following patch, we set this bitmap while
>>> scanning the anon PMD.
>>>
>>> max_ptes_none is used as a scale to determine how "full" an order must
>>> be before being considered for collapse.
>>>
>>> When attempting to collapse an order that has its order set to "always"
>>> lets always collapse to that order in a greedy manner without
>>> considering the number of bits set.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Nico Pache <npache@redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>> include/linux/khugepaged.h | 4 ++
>>> mm/khugepaged.c | 94 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>>> 2 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/khugepaged.h b/include/linux/khugepaged.h
>>> index 1f46046080f5..18fe6eb5051d 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/khugepaged.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/khugepaged.h
>>> @@ -1,6 +1,10 @@
>>> /* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
>>> #ifndef _LINUX_KHUGEPAGED_H
>>> #define _LINUX_KHUGEPAGED_H
>>> +#define KHUGEPAGED_MIN_MTHP_ORDER 2
>> Still better to add some comments to explain explicitly why choose 2 as
>> the MIN_MTHP_ORDER.
> Ok i'll add a note that explicitly states that the min order of anon mTHPs is 2
>>> +#define KHUGEPAGED_MIN_MTHP_NR (1<<KHUGEPAGED_MIN_MTHP_ORDER)
>>> +#define MAX_MTHP_BITMAP_SIZE (1 << (ilog2(MAX_PTRS_PER_PTE) - KHUGEPAGED_MIN_MTHP_ORDER))
>>> +#define MTHP_BITMAP_SIZE (1 << (HPAGE_PMD_ORDER - KHUGEPAGED_MIN_MTHP_ORDER))
>>>
>>> extern unsigned int khugepaged_max_ptes_none __read_mostly;
>>> #ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
>>> diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c
>>> index e21998a06253..6e67db86409a 100644
>>> --- a/mm/khugepaged.c
>>> +++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
>>> @@ -94,6 +94,11 @@ static DEFINE_READ_MOSTLY_HASHTABLE(mm_slots_hash, MM_SLOTS_HASH_BITS);
>>>
>>> static struct kmem_cache *mm_slot_cache __ro_after_init;
>>>
>>> +struct scan_bit_state {
>>> + u8 order;
>>> + u16 offset;
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> struct collapse_control {
>>> bool is_khugepaged;
>>>
>>> @@ -102,6 +107,18 @@ struct collapse_control {
>>>
>>> /* nodemask for allocation fallback */
>>> nodemask_t alloc_nmask;
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * bitmap used to collapse mTHP sizes.
>>> + * 1bit = order KHUGEPAGED_MIN_MTHP_ORDER mTHP
>>> + */
>>> + DECLARE_BITMAP(mthp_bitmap, MAX_MTHP_BITMAP_SIZE);
>>> + DECLARE_BITMAP(mthp_bitmap_temp, MAX_MTHP_BITMAP_SIZE);
>>> + struct scan_bit_state mthp_bitmap_stack[MAX_MTHP_BITMAP_SIZE];
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +struct collapse_control khugepaged_collapse_control = {
>>> + .is_khugepaged = true,
>>> };
>>>
>>> /**
>>> @@ -851,10 +868,6 @@ static void khugepaged_alloc_sleep(void)
>>> remove_wait_queue(&khugepaged_wait, &wait);
>>> }
>>>
>>> -struct collapse_control khugepaged_collapse_control = {
>>> - .is_khugepaged = true,
>>> -};
>>> -
>>> static bool khugepaged_scan_abort(int nid, struct collapse_control *cc)
>>> {
>>> int i;
>>> @@ -1118,7 +1131,8 @@ static int alloc_charge_folio(struct folio **foliop, struct mm_struct *mm,
>>>
>>> static int collapse_huge_page(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
>>> int referenced, int unmapped,
>>> - struct collapse_control *cc)
>>> + struct collapse_control *cc, bool *mmap_locked,
>>> + u8 order, u16 offset)
>>> {
>>> LIST_HEAD(compound_pagelist);
>>> pmd_t *pmd, _pmd;
>>> @@ -1137,8 +1151,12 @@ static int collapse_huge_page(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
>>> * The allocation can take potentially a long time if it involves
>>> * sync compaction, and we do not need to hold the mmap_lock during
>>> * that. We will recheck the vma after taking it again in write mode.
>>> + * If collapsing mTHPs we may have already released the read_lock.
>>> */
>>> - mmap_read_unlock(mm);
>>> + if (*mmap_locked) {
>>> + mmap_read_unlock(mm);
>>> + *mmap_locked = false;
>>> + }
>>>
>>> result = alloc_charge_folio(&folio, mm, cc, HPAGE_PMD_ORDER);
>>> if (result != SCAN_SUCCEED)
>>> @@ -1273,12 +1291,72 @@ static int collapse_huge_page(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
>>> out_up_write:
>>> mmap_write_unlock(mm);
>>> out_nolock:
>>> + *mmap_locked = false;
>>> if (folio)
>>> folio_put(folio);
>>> trace_mm_collapse_huge_page(mm, result == SCAN_SUCCEED, result);
>>> return result;
>>> }
>>>
>>> +// Recursive function to consume the bitmap
>> Nit: please use '/* Xxxx */' for comments in this patch.
>>
>>> +static int khugepaged_scan_bitmap(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
>>> + int referenced, int unmapped, struct collapse_control *cc,
>>> + bool *mmap_locked, unsigned long enabled_orders)
>>> +{
>>> + u8 order, next_order;
>>> + u16 offset, mid_offset;
>>> + int num_chunks;
>>> + int bits_set, threshold_bits;
>>> + int top = -1;
>>> + int collapsed = 0;
>>> + int ret;
>>> + struct scan_bit_state state;
>>> + bool is_pmd_only = (enabled_orders == (1 << HPAGE_PMD_ORDER));
>>> +
>>> + cc->mthp_bitmap_stack[++top] = (struct scan_bit_state)
>>> + { HPAGE_PMD_ORDER - KHUGEPAGED_MIN_MTHP_ORDER, 0 };
>>> +
>>> + while (top >= 0) {
>>> + state = cc->mthp_bitmap_stack[top--];
>>> + order = state.order + KHUGEPAGED_MIN_MTHP_ORDER;
>>> + offset = state.offset;
>>> + num_chunks = 1 << (state.order);
>>> + // Skip mTHP orders that are not enabled
>>> + if (!test_bit(order, &enabled_orders))
>>> + goto next;
>>> +
>>> + // copy the relavant section to a new bitmap
>>> + bitmap_shift_right(cc->mthp_bitmap_temp, cc->mthp_bitmap, offset,
>>> + MTHP_BITMAP_SIZE);
>>> +
>>> + bits_set = bitmap_weight(cc->mthp_bitmap_temp, num_chunks);
>>> + threshold_bits = (HPAGE_PMD_NR - khugepaged_max_ptes_none - 1)
>>> + >> (HPAGE_PMD_ORDER - state.order);
>>> +
>>> + //Check if the region is "almost full" based on the threshold
>>> + if (bits_set > threshold_bits || is_pmd_only
>>> + || test_bit(order, &huge_anon_orders_always)) {
>> When testing this patch, I disabled the PMD-sized THP and enabled
>> 64K-sized mTHP, but it still attempts to collapse into a PMD-sized THP
>> (since bits_set > threshold_bits is ture). This doesn't seem reasonable?
> We are still required to have PMD enabled for mTHP collapse to work.
> It's a limitation of the current khugepaged code (it currently only
> adds mm_slots when PMD is enabled).
> We've discussed this in the past and are looking for a proper way
> forward, but the solution becomes tricky.
Not sure if this is still a problem, but does this patch solve
it?
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250211111326.14295-12-dev.jain@arm.com/
>
> However I'm surprised that it still collapses due to the code below.
> I'll test this out later today.
> + if (!test_bit(order, &enabled_orders))
> + goto next;
>>> + ret = collapse_huge_page(mm, address, referenced, unmapped, cc,
>>> + mmap_locked, order, offset * KHUGEPAGED_MIN_MTHP_NR);
>>> + if (ret == SCAN_SUCCEED) {
>>> + collapsed += (1 << order);
>>> + continue;
>>> + }
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> +next:
>>> + if (state.order > 0) {
>>> + next_order = state.order - 1;
>>> + mid_offset = offset + (num_chunks / 2);
>>> + cc->mthp_bitmap_stack[++top] = (struct scan_bit_state)
>>> + { next_order, mid_offset };
>>> + cc->mthp_bitmap_stack[++top] = (struct scan_bit_state)
>>> + { next_order, offset };
>>> + }
>>> + }
>>> + return collapsed;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> static int khugepaged_scan_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm,
>>> struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>> unsigned long address, bool *mmap_locked,
>>> @@ -1445,9 +1523,7 @@ static int khugepaged_scan_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm,
>>> pte_unmap_unlock(pte, ptl);
>>> if (result == SCAN_SUCCEED) {
>>> result = collapse_huge_page(mm, address, referenced,
>>> - unmapped, cc);
>>> - /* collapse_huge_page will return with the mmap_lock released */
>>> - *mmap_locked = false;
>>> + unmapped, cc, mmap_locked, HPAGE_PMD_ORDER, 0);
>>> }
>>> out:
>>> trace_mm_khugepaged_scan_pmd(mm, &folio->page, writable, referenced,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-06 16:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-28 18:12 [PATCH v5 00/12] khugepaged: mTHP support Nico Pache
2025-04-28 18:12 ` [PATCH v5 01/12] khugepaged: rename hpage_collapse_* to khugepaged_* Nico Pache
2025-04-29 13:41 ` Zi Yan
2025-04-30 7:47 ` Baolin Wang
2025-04-28 18:12 ` [PATCH v5 02/12] introduce khugepaged_collapse_single_pmd to unify khugepaged and madvise_collapse Nico Pache
2025-04-30 7:56 ` Baolin Wang
2025-04-28 18:12 ` [PATCH v5 03/12] khugepaged: generalize hugepage_vma_revalidate for mTHP support Nico Pache
2025-04-28 18:12 ` [PATCH v5 04/12] khugepaged: generalize alloc_charge_folio() Nico Pache
2025-04-28 18:12 ` [PATCH v5 05/12] khugepaged: generalize __collapse_huge_page_* for mTHP support Nico Pache
2025-04-28 18:12 ` [PATCH v5 06/12] khugepaged: introduce khugepaged_scan_bitmap " Nico Pache
2025-04-30 10:08 ` Baolin Wang
2025-04-30 18:56 ` Nico Pache
2025-05-01 23:03 ` Nico Pache
2025-05-02 1:23 ` Baolin Wang
2025-06-06 16:37 ` Dev Jain [this message]
2025-06-07 12:48 ` Nico Pache
2025-04-28 18:12 ` [PATCH v5 07/12] khugepaged: add " Nico Pache
2025-04-30 20:51 ` Jann Horn
2025-05-01 22:29 ` Nico Pache
2025-05-02 6:29 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-02 12:50 ` Jann Horn
2025-05-02 15:18 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-02 15:24 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-05-02 15:39 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-02 15:26 ` Jann Horn
2025-05-02 15:30 ` Nico Pache
2025-05-02 15:42 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-01 12:58 ` Hugh Dickins
2025-05-01 16:15 ` Andrew Morton
2025-05-01 22:30 ` Nico Pache
2025-04-28 18:12 ` [PATCH v5 08/12] khugepaged: skip collapsing mTHP to smaller orders Nico Pache
2025-04-30 10:09 ` Baolin Wang
2025-04-28 18:12 ` [PATCH v5 09/12] khugepaged: avoid unnecessary mTHP collapse attempts Nico Pache
2025-04-30 10:12 ` Baolin Wang
2025-04-30 18:43 ` Nico Pache
2025-04-28 18:12 ` [PATCH v5 10/12] khugepaged: improve tracepoints for mTHP orders Nico Pache
2025-04-28 18:12 ` [PATCH v5 11/12] khugepaged: add per-order mTHP khugepaged stats Nico Pache
2025-04-28 18:12 ` [PATCH v5 12/12] Documentation: mm: update the admin guide for mTHP collapse Nico Pache
2025-04-29 5:10 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2025-04-29 16:38 ` Christoph Lameter (Ampere)
2025-04-29 17:15 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b2e0b383-d28f-436e-a83c-ab58b0eae995@arm.com \
--to=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jglisse@google.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=npache@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=raquini@redhat.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=sunnanyong@huawei.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=usamaarif642@gmail.com \
--cc=vishal.moola@gmail.com \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
--cc=zokeefe@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).