From: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
To: Yury Norov <ynorov@nvidia.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org,
peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, yury.norov@gmail.com,
kprateek.nayak@amd.com, iii@linux.ibm.com, corbet@lwn.net,
tglx@kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, pbonzini@redhat.com,
seanjc@google.com, vschneid@redhat.com, huschle@linux.ibm.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
maddy@linux.ibm.com, srikar@linux.ibm.com, hdanton@sina.com,
chleroy@kernel.org, vineeth@bitbyteword.org, frederic@kernel.org,
arighi@nvidia.com, pauld@redhat.com, christian.loehle@arm.com,
tj@kernel.org, tommaso.cucinotta@gmail.com, maz@kernel.org,
rafael@kernel.org, rdunlap@infradead.org, kernellwp@gmail.com,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 06/12] sched/core: Push current task from non preferred CPU
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2026 18:05:50 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b584236d-40c4-424a-a32f-21cd4ddc674b@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alF6AqiSWZBlF_c2@yury>
On 7/11/26 4:32 AM, Yury Norov wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2026 at 03:26:42AM +0530, Shrikanth Hegde wrote:
>> Actively push out task running on a non-preferred CPU. Since the task is
>> running on the CPU, need to stop the cpu and push the task out.
>> However, if the task is pinned only to non-preferred CPUs, it will continue
>> running there. This will help in maintaining the userspace affinities
>> unlike CPU hotplug or isolated cpusets.
>>
>> Though code is similar to __balance_push_cpu_stop and quite close to
>> push_cpu_stop, it is being kept separate as it provides a cleaner
>> implementation with CONFIG_PREFERRED_CPU.
>>
>> Add push_task_work_done flag to protect work buffer.
>> Works only with FAIR class.
>>
>> For now, only current running task is pushed out. This keeps the code
>> simpler. In future optimization maybe done to move all the queued
>> task on the rq.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> v6->v7:
>> - Moved is_migration_disabled
>> - removed fair class check
>>
>> kernel/sched/core.c | 78 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> kernel/sched/sched.h | 8 +++++
>> 2 files changed, 86 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
>> index 9e8eec4451b6..74c93a88bf84 100644
>> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
>> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
>> @@ -5774,6 +5774,9 @@ void sched_tick(void)
>> unsigned long hw_pressure;
>> u64 resched_latency;
>>
>> + if (!cpu_preferred(cpu))
>> + sched_push_current_non_preferred_cpu(rq);
>> +
>> if (housekeeping_cpu(cpu, HK_TYPE_KERNEL_NOISE))
>> arch_scale_freq_tick();
>>
>> @@ -11292,3 +11295,78 @@ void sched_change_end(struct sched_change_ctx *ctx)
>> p->sched_class->prio_changed(rq, p, ctx->prio);
>> }
>> }
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PREFERRED_CPU
>> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpu_stop_work, npc_push_task_work);
>> +
>> +static int sched_non_preferred_cpu_push_stop(void *arg)
>> +{
>> + struct task_struct *p = arg;
>> + struct rq *rq = this_rq();
>> + struct rq_flags rf;
>> + int cpu;
>> +
>> + /* sanity checks and clear */
>> + if (cpu_preferred(rq->cpu) || is_migration_disabled(p)) {
>> + scoped_guard(rq_lock, rq)
>> + rq->push_task_work_done = false;
>> + put_task_struct(p);
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>> +
>> + raw_spin_lock_irq(&p->pi_lock);
>> +
>> + /* This could take rq lock. So call it before rq lock is taken */
>> + cpu = select_fallback_rq(rq->cpu, p);
>> + rq_lock(rq, &rf);
>> + rq->push_task_work_done = false;
>> + update_rq_clock(rq);
>> +
>> + context_unsafe_alias(rq);
>> +
>> + if (task_rq(p) == rq && task_on_rq_queued(p))
>> + rq = __migrate_task(rq, &rf, p, cpu);
>> +
>> + rq_unlock(rq, &rf);
>> + raw_spin_unlock_irq(&p->pi_lock);
>> + put_task_struct(p);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Push the current task running on non-preferred CPU(npc).
>> + * Using this non preferred CPU will lead to more vCPU preemptions
>> + * in the host. So it is better not to use this CPU.
>> + *
>> + * Since task is running, call a stopper to push the task out. This is
>> + * similar to how task moves during hotplug. In select_fallback_rq a
>> + * preferred CPU will be chosen and henceforth task shouldn't come back to
>> + * this CPU again.
>> + *
>> + * Works for FAIR class only
>> + *
>> + * If task is affined only non-preferred CPUs, it can't be moved out
>> + */
>> +void sched_push_current_non_preferred_cpu(struct rq *rq)
>> +{
>> + struct task_struct *push_task = rq->curr;
>> +
>> + /* Don't push the task if task's affinity doesn't allow */
>> + if (!task_can_sched_on_preferred(rq->cpu, push_task))
>> + return;
>
> Shouldn't you protect it with the rq lock against races with affinity or
> policy changes? The task_can_sched_on_preferred() checks p->sched_class
> and p->cpus_ptr.
>
Likely yes. I did below. It has survived light testing so far.
i.e.
- Moved checks under rq lock held.
- There was a tiny window where task could have migrated.
Moved it down further just before migrating.
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 6ed61182b19f..eda080ab3427 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -11311,7 +11311,7 @@ static int sched_non_preferred_cpu_push_stop(void *arg)
int cpu;
/* sanity checks and clear */
- if (cpu_preferred(rq->cpu) || is_migration_disabled(p)) {
+ if (cpu_preferred(rq->cpu)) {
scoped_guard(rq_lock, rq)
rq->push_task_work_done = false;
put_task_struct(p);
@@ -11328,7 +11328,8 @@ static int sched_non_preferred_cpu_push_stop(void *arg)
context_unsafe_alias(rq);
- if (task_rq(p) == rq && task_on_rq_queued(p)) {
+ if (task_rq(p) == rq && task_on_rq_queued(p)
+ && !is_migration_disabled(p)) {
struct rq *dest_rq;
dest_rq = __migrate_task(rq, &rf, p, cpu);
@@ -11362,19 +11363,20 @@ void sched_push_current_non_preferred_cpu(struct rq *rq)
{
struct task_struct *push_task = rq->curr;
- /* Don't push the task if task's affinity doesn't allow */
- if (!task_can_sched_on_preferred(rq->cpu, push_task))
- return;
+ scoped_guard(rq_lock, rq) {
+ /* Don't push the task if task's affinity doesn't allow */
+ if (!task_can_sched_on_preferred(rq->cpu, push_task))
+ return;
- /* There is already a stopper thread. Don't race with it. */
- if (rq->push_task_work_done)
- return;
+ /* There is already a stopper thread. Don't race with it. */
+ if (rq->push_task_work_done)
+ return;
- /* sched_tick runs with interrupts disabled. */
- get_task_struct(push_task);
+ /* sched_tick runs with interrupts disabled. */
+ get_task_struct(push_task);
- scoped_guard(rq_lock, rq)
rq->push_task_work_done = true;
+ }
stop_one_cpu_nowait(rq->cpu, sched_non_preferred_cpu_push_stop,
push_task, this_cpu_ptr(&npc_push_task_work));
>> +
>> + /* There is already a stopper thread. Don't race with it. */
>> + if (rq->push_task_work_done)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + /* sched_tick runs with interrupts disabled. */
>> + get_task_struct(push_task);
>> +
>> + scoped_guard(rq_lock, rq)
>> + rq->push_task_work_done = true;
>> +
>> + stop_one_cpu_nowait(rq->cpu, sched_non_preferred_cpu_push_stop,
>> + push_task, this_cpu_ptr(&npc_push_task_work));
>> +}
>> +#endif
>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
>> index 6de6366f2faa..80c02e2c09eb 100644
>> --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
>> +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
>> @@ -1277,6 +1277,8 @@ struct rq {
>>
>> struct list_head cfs_tasks;
>>
>> + bool push_task_work_done;
>> +
>> struct sched_avg avg_rt;
>> struct sched_avg avg_dl;
>> #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_SCHED_AVG_IRQ
>> @@ -4242,4 +4244,10 @@ static inline bool task_can_sched_on_preferred(int cpu, struct task_struct *p)
>> return cpumask_intersects(p->cpus_ptr, cpu_preferred_mask);
>> }
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PREFERRED_CPU
>> +void sched_push_current_non_preferred_cpu(struct rq *rq);
>> +#else /* !CONFIG_PREFERRED_CPU */
>> +static inline void sched_push_current_non_preferred_cpu(struct rq *rq) { }
>> +#endif
>> +
>> #endif /* _KERNEL_SCHED_SCHED_H */
>> --
>> 2.47.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-13 12:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-09 21:56 [PATCH v7 00/12] sched, steal_monitor: Introduce cpu_preferred_mask and steal-driven vCPU backoff Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-09 21:56 ` [PATCH v7 01/12] sched/docs: Document cpu_preferred_mask and Preferred CPU concept Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-09 21:56 ` [PATCH v7 02/12] cpumask: Introduce cpu_preferred_mask Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-13 14:53 ` Yury Norov
2026-07-14 6:30 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-14 13:01 ` Yury Norov
2026-07-09 21:56 ` [PATCH v7 03/12] sysfs: Add preferred CPU file Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-10 15:41 ` Yury Norov
2026-07-10 17:00 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-10 23:09 ` Yury Norov
2026-07-13 12:00 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-09 21:56 ` [PATCH v7 04/12] sched/core: Try to use a preferred CPU in is_cpu_allowed Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-09 21:56 ` [PATCH v7 05/12] sched/fair: Load balance only among preferred CPUs Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-09 21:56 ` [PATCH v7 06/12] sched/core: Push current task from non preferred CPU Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-10 23:02 ` Yury Norov
2026-07-13 12:35 ` Shrikanth Hegde [this message]
2026-07-09 21:56 ` [PATCH v7 07/12] sched/debug: Add migration stats due to non preferred CPUs Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-09 21:56 ` [PATCH v7 08/12] virt: Introduce steal monitor driver Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-10 1:27 ` Randy Dunlap
2026-07-10 4:28 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-10 20:53 ` Yury Norov
2026-07-13 12:06 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-09 21:56 ` [PATCH v7 09/12] virt/steal_monitor: Add control knobs for handling steal values Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-10 4:27 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-09 21:56 ` [PATCH v7 10/12] virt/steal_monitor: Provide functions for managing " Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-10 4:30 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-10 20:00 ` Yury Norov
2026-07-13 5:13 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-14 12:47 ` Yury Norov
2026-07-14 13:15 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-09 21:56 ` [PATCH v7 11/12] virt/steal_monitor: Act on steal time periodically and decide on preferred CPUs Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-10 20:37 ` Yury Norov
2026-07-13 5:48 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-14 12:31 ` Yury Norov
2026-07-14 13:08 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-09 21:56 ` [PATCH v7 12/12] sched, virt/steal_monitor: Keep tick on for faster push on nohz_full CPU Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-10 6:35 ` Shrikanth Hegde
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b584236d-40c4-424a-a32f-21cd4ddc674b@linux.ibm.com \
--to=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
--cc=christian.loehle@arm.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hdanton@sina.com \
--cc=huschle@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kernellwp@gmail.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=pauld@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=srikar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=tommaso.cucinotta@gmail.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vineeth@bitbyteword.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=ynorov@nvidia.com \
--cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox