From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch (vps0.lunn.ch [156.67.10.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B968C2DB79F; Sat, 9 May 2026 19:43:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=156.67.10.101 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778355817; cv=none; b=f+VtxUK+nYb4PmbJD12G1H4LEK8TV4/TvYP6ckzY8/56ZJCKzLZ4dt6vY1vtMJKgt2nn2pU9xv4i3SjIu/Xlq3lFMO3QG7jNbL1mwYd6hy2JXdSTxohjN2rhcghX9JLJ+jwdQamjMnn3YRcp8onOAQ8+XRvC96iyJgbO8QuU8i0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778355817; c=relaxed/simple; bh=FHZ6Od0X5fZc57mS2ulH4kYBV/NGDrHi+Ez6WkWuRnw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=NiWjAjPK3Sk1I2Tgatue88iJkkVnEEcVHMLo8Nk7kEUOMgs4aQamzWj/xscOpZqxhPV2cBBfOCs9dRPxv2YFh64mtmNAU95F+NVN2l7uvybA/6xWHfi7JiTqMKU28AboyyvoonHIsN7GfiOX3JWtjYkTOwcHUX1lKNpex+YGazc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lunn.ch; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lunn.ch; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=lunn.ch header.i=@lunn.ch header.b=rdEHE2/F; arc=none smtp.client-ip=156.67.10.101 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lunn.ch Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lunn.ch Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=lunn.ch header.i=@lunn.ch header.b="rdEHE2/F" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lunn.ch; s=20171124; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition: Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:From: Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Content-Disposition: In-Reply-To:References; bh=jciCmPafrQJc8P0lqfJxu/JWuFjCcvpFpjFvymBX9Uk=; b=rd EHE2/FfULvb68lmwWW7cDL8/4X8OHfz/tTxdC0sJpTTZ0VUMTtP9ak77xyNTqv4fjiIx0xSrhisgp Xwt8fa4J448k3y3AHPMut0OJqNHmSPcYtaZSkLC62Mo2W9XGpl5+JdElSwr7bhfxyVzwT4xUBV5Q8 4/0CMSZ8qcLukHs=; Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1wLna2-00289a-9c; Sat, 09 May 2026 21:43:18 +0200 Date: Sat, 9 May 2026 21:43:18 +0200 From: Andrew Lunn To: Illusion Wang Cc: Paolo Abeni , Dimon , Alvin , Sam , netdev , andrew+netdev , corbet , kuba , linux-doc , lorenzo , horms , "vadim.fedorenko" , "lukas.bulwahn" , edumazet , enelsonmoore , skhan , hkallweit1 , open list Subject: Re: =?utf-8?B?5Zue5aSN77ya5Zue5aSN77yaW1BB?= =?utf-8?Q?TCH_v13_net-nex?= =?utf-8?Q?t?= 03/11] net/nebula-matrix: add chip related definitions Message-ID: References: <20260428114910.2616-1-illusion.wang@nebula-matrix.com> <20260428114910.2616-4-illusion.wang@nebula-matrix.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Sat, May 09, 2026 at 11:38:27AM +0800, Illusion Wang wrote: > > >> But I printed out the results: > >> ARRAY_SIZE(nbl_sec009_data) equals NBL_SEC009_SIZE, > >> ARRAY_SIZE(nbl_sec025_data) equals NBL_SEC025_SIZE, > >> and ARRAY_SIZE(nbl_sec022_data) equals NBL_SEC022_SIZE. > >> > >> Is the AI making a mistake here? > > >Just a guess, i've not looked at this patch at all. > > >Are you doing this on a 32 bit build? Maybe the AI is? > >  >   Andrew > > We are using this on a 64 bit build. And what happens with a 32 bit build? Try think of all the ways the AI could be correct., and disprove them. Andrew