From: Boris Kolpackov <boris@codesynthesis.com>
To: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kconfig: drop filename and line number prefix from warning/error-if macros
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2020 16:22:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <boris.20201221161803@codesynthesis.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201221094650.283511-1-masahiroy@kernel.org>
[Copying some of my comments from another reply.]
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> writes:
> When I implemented the Kconfig macro language, I took the GNU Make
> behavior as a reference in general, but I did not follow the message
> format of $(error ...) to avoid that annoyance.
>
> So, the following code in Kconfig:
>
> $(warning-if,y,This is the first line)
> $(warning-if,y,This is the second line)
> $(error-if,y,This is the last line)
>
> ... will print the messages in a consistent format:
>
> Kconfig:1: This is the first line
> Kconfig:2: This is the second line
> Kconfig:3: This is the last line
IMO, there is a flaw with this approach: there is no way for the
user to know that these three lines are about the same error.
If we want this ability, then let's find a way do it properly
rather than spreading further hacks. For example, in the build
system I am working on, we have suport for multi-line diagnostics
records that to the user look like this:
Makefile:3: error: This is the first line
This is the second line
This is the last line
> But, in hindsight, the built-in functions should have only primitive
> functionality to print the given message without any prefix. The lesson
> I learned from GNU Make was such a prefix is easy to add, difficult to
> remove.
>
> This commit changes the built-in functions, warning-if and error-if, to
> not print the file name or the line number.
Wouldn't automatically showing the position in the Kconfig file
where the error/warning has originated be much, much more useful
than the occasional need to print multi-line messages?
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-21 14:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-21 9:46 [PATCH] kconfig: drop filename and line number prefix from warning/error-if macros Masahiro Yamada
2020-12-21 14:22 ` Boris Kolpackov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=boris.20201221161803@codesynthesis.com \
--to=boris@codesynthesis.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
--cc=michal.lkml@markovi.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).