Re: [PATCH] Documentation: riscv: Fix typo MIMPLID -> MIMPID

[Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>]

Hi Nam, Jon,

On 25/09/2024 16:25, Nam Cao wrote:
> The macro that is really defined is RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_MIMPID, not
> RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_MIMPLID (difference is the 'L').
>
> Also, the riscv privileged specification names the register "mimpid", not
> "mimplid".
>
> Correct these typos.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de>
> ---
> ask me how I found out..
>
>   Documentation/arch/riscv/hwprobe.rst | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/arch/riscv/hwprobe.rst b/Documentation/arch/riscv/hwprobe.rst
> index 85b709257918..fb0affa61eb9 100644
> --- a/Documentation/arch/riscv/hwprobe.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/arch/riscv/hwprobe.rst
> @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ The following keys are defined:
>   * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_MARCHID`: Contains the value of ``marchid``, as
>     defined by the RISC-V privileged architecture specification.
>   
> -* :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_MIMPLID`: Contains the value of ``mimplid``, as
> +* :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_MIMPID`: Contains the value of ``mimpid``, as
>     defined by the RISC-V privileged architecture specification.
>   
>   * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_BASE_BEHAVIOR`: A bitmask containing the base


It looks like this patch was never merged even though it is relevant. 
@Jon: is it ok to merge it as-is? If you want, I can merge it, let me 
know how you want to proceed.

Thanks,

Alex