From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C794FC7618E for ; Thu, 16 Mar 2023 23:18:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230046AbjCPXSR (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Mar 2023 19:18:17 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34514 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229842AbjCPXSQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Mar 2023 19:18:16 -0400 Received: from mail-qt1-x82e.google.com (mail-qt1-x82e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82e]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A0938615E; Thu, 16 Mar 2023 16:18:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qt1-x82e.google.com with SMTP id h19so3668103qtn.1; Thu, 16 Mar 2023 16:18:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; t=1679008694; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=hizf1rKt9yqJi/dPDTO6w3mkjCS9486AALEnSxm1ai4=; b=IMOuEpxDsSBgvV8mrJdwgxOaUK9UYcOo4fAkHn5O/PUvR2GcJBXTQiUVA5JBrKxTDg SN4f7GEnuLJ7GL4unBLHdWzCrKLaySs00RXkX0dFKMYjOFmKf6Txg95SwCEacZeUNOwc rHYT54FhG1RTaGDpmTAo61UN4TafoiENmw9WNn9O2JlWIPIMnLlOIMjtFEBExqQYQl/t FtfVOIz5mG6lz8s89uCmp2RedrsiiPVppQTs9T5Dp4bQ+USHQSFAhAwvyx0GDcuNoaC3 GgsgsatfDn3EEwqvIcQHlZ51KSo/az7KH+kXuJ8IdtdCuhsnK99gdVx76S5F9Eu6dfrM r1fg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1679008694; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=hizf1rKt9yqJi/dPDTO6w3mkjCS9486AALEnSxm1ai4=; b=Ta82Kono8Goh9Ujnh9pBhMo9wvB6Ng8Wq8Dv1FUDGiGiH2vc+A67zp4YETUQaROuvl 82TmGMyJi/HoMQWEKL0kIiuyEBSmd9c03HNW2g2x+byfGl+QAJJLhVuSOn5eUL7n2qne fqNsaQ5a/zE9I7hBBnbAJk8o0yC2Bd492cuL58oC9FJjiaCNCBLvhPaqwzXqOBYHJM/e 8cqg4jPJA48EK44VpeKPOmg73r6biYxCQ1TnrHZ+Ctyy+IS0K+ZObgC8dP8TDqzGv0iN o5bCvO39EB35oJ0RjG00gapmX0/mvoI1KO2trRGb7EQVJwsACDqj4YpXPWnDEwUpteP1 Oqew== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKXqoGQppPBMLlqeaKWQ7EUE/6qiQNr0vmuYhhW0WyzYyEV2BLhm sm7hkJqxwUamM3IZq2RuxuY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set/sS4Fb9KPNSK/wEhFU3sxhZEekJKHlG2yB63AmLevYMFDErYt3Kr4B5PISzdiEw3ZDsRC0Qw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:170c:b0:3b9:bc8c:c212 with SMTP id h12-20020a05622a170c00b003b9bc8cc212mr2080410qtk.29.1679008694696; Thu, 16 Mar 2023 16:18:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.67.48.245] ([192.19.223.252]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id 13-20020a37080d000000b007456efa7f73sm472676qki.85.2023.03.16.16.18.10 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 16 Mar 2023 16:18:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2023 16:18:08 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.7.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] docs: networking: document NAPI Content-Language: en-US To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: Stephen Hemminger , davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, jesse.brandeburg@intel.com, anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com, corbet@lwn.net, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org References: <20230315223044.471002-1-kuba@kernel.org> <20230315155202.2bba7e20@hermes.local> <20230315161142.48de9d98@kernel.org> <7ddfa9e1-c7a2-7a62-a2ba-eb2c93a3a2fa@gmail.com> <20230316160757.52ea01b0@kernel.org> From: Florian Fainelli In-Reply-To: <20230316160757.52ea01b0@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org On 3/16/23 16:07, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Thu, 16 Mar 2023 15:59:49 -0700 Florian Fainelli wrote: >> True, though I would put a word in or two about level vs. edge triggered >> anyway, if nothing else, explain essentially what Stephen just provided >> ought to be a good starting point for driver writers to consider the >> possible issue. > > It's not a blocker for something close to the current document > going in, tho, right? More of a future extension (possibly done > by someone else...) ? Works for me, Stephen should have plenty of time to come up with an addendum ;) -- Florian