From: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com>
To: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: daniel@ffwll.ch, airlied@redhat.com, christian.koenig@amd.com,
bskeggs@redhat.com, jason@jlekstrand.net, tzimmermann@suse.de,
mripard@kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net,
nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH drm-next 05/14] drm/nouveau: new VM_BIND uapi interfaces
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 04:33:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c684cbed-c6a9-f863-fac0-a9ee6af35b23@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y9NDTrGhSXomICEE@DUT025-TGLU.fm.intel.com>
On 1/27/23 04:21, Matthew Brost wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 02:43:30AM +0100, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 1/27/23 02:05, Matthew Brost wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 07:12:47AM +0100, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
>>>> This commit provides the interfaces for the new UAPI motivated by the
>>>> Vulkan API. It allows user mode drivers (UMDs) to:
>>>>
>>>> 1) Initialize a GPU virtual address (VA) space via the new
>>>> DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_VM_INIT ioctl. UMDs can provide a kernel reserved
>>>> VA area.
>>>>
>>>> 2) Bind and unbind GPU VA space mappings via the new
>>>> DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_VM_BIND ioctl.
>>>>
>>>> 3) Execute push buffers with the new DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_EXEC ioctl.
>>>>
>>>> Both, DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_VM_BIND and DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_EXEC support
>>>> asynchronous processing with DRM syncobjs as synchronization mechanism.
>>>>
>>>> The default DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_VM_BIND is synchronous processing,
>>>> DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_EXEC supports asynchronous processing only.
>>>>
>>>> Co-authored-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> Documentation/gpu/driver-uapi.rst | 8 ++
>>>> include/uapi/drm/nouveau_drm.h | 216 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> 2 files changed, 224 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/gpu/driver-uapi.rst b/Documentation/gpu/driver-uapi.rst
>>>> index 4411e6919a3d..9c7ca6e33a68 100644
>>>> --- a/Documentation/gpu/driver-uapi.rst
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/gpu/driver-uapi.rst
>>>> @@ -6,3 +6,11 @@ drm/i915 uAPI
>>>> =============
>>>> .. kernel-doc:: include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
>>>> +
>>>> +drm/nouveau uAPI
>>>> +================
>>>> +
>>>> +VM_BIND / EXEC uAPI
>>>> +-------------------
>>>> +
>>>> +.. kernel-doc:: include/uapi/drm/nouveau_drm.h
>>>> diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/nouveau_drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/nouveau_drm.h
>>>> index 853a327433d3..f6e7d40201d4 100644
>>>> --- a/include/uapi/drm/nouveau_drm.h
>>>> +++ b/include/uapi/drm/nouveau_drm.h
>>>> @@ -126,6 +126,216 @@ struct drm_nouveau_gem_cpu_fini {
>>>> __u32 handle;
>>>> };
>>>> +/**
>>>> + * struct drm_nouveau_sync - sync object
>>>> + *
>>>> + * This structure serves as synchronization mechanism for (potentially)
>>>> + * asynchronous operations such as EXEC or VM_BIND.
>>>> + */
>>>> +struct drm_nouveau_sync {
>>>> + /**
>>>> + * @flags: the flags for a sync object
>>>> + *
>>>> + * The first 8 bits are used to determine the type of the sync object.
>>>> + */
>>>> + __u32 flags;
>>>> +#define DRM_NOUVEAU_SYNC_SYNCOBJ 0x0
>>>> +#define DRM_NOUVEAU_SYNC_TIMELINE_SYNCOBJ 0x1
>>>> +#define DRM_NOUVEAU_SYNC_TYPE_MASK 0xf
>>>> + /**
>>>> + * @handle: the handle of the sync object
>>>> + */
>>>> + __u32 handle;
>>>> + /**
>>>> + * @timeline_value:
>>>> + *
>>>> + * The timeline point of the sync object in case the syncobj is of
>>>> + * type DRM_NOUVEAU_SYNC_TIMELINE_SYNCOBJ.
>>>> + */
>>>> + __u64 timeline_value;
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +/**
>>>> + * struct drm_nouveau_vm_init - GPU VA space init structure
>>>> + *
>>>> + * Used to initialize the GPU's VA space for a user client, telling the kernel
>>>> + * which portion of the VA space is managed by the UMD and kernel respectively.
>>>> + */
>>>> +struct drm_nouveau_vm_init {
>>>> + /**
>>>> + * @unmanaged_addr: start address of the kernel managed VA space region
>>>> + */
>>>> + __u64 unmanaged_addr;
>>>> + /**
>>>> + * @unmanaged_size: size of the kernel managed VA space region in bytes
>>>> + */
>>>> + __u64 unmanaged_size;
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +/**
>>>> + * struct drm_nouveau_vm_bind_op - VM_BIND operation
>>>> + *
>>>> + * This structure represents a single VM_BIND operation. UMDs should pass
>>>> + * an array of this structure via struct drm_nouveau_vm_bind's &op_ptr field.
>>>> + */
>>>> +struct drm_nouveau_vm_bind_op {
>>>> + /**
>>>> + * @op: the operation type
>>>> + */
>>>> + __u32 op;
>>>> +/**
>>>> + * @DRM_NOUVEAU_VM_BIND_OP_ALLOC:
>>>> + *
>>>> + * The alloc operation is used to reserve a VA space region within the GPU's VA
>>>> + * space. Optionally, the &DRM_NOUVEAU_VM_BIND_SPARSE flag can be passed to
>>>> + * instruct the kernel to create sparse mappings for the given region.
>>>> + */
>>>> +#define DRM_NOUVEAU_VM_BIND_OP_ALLOC 0x0
>>>
>>> Do you really need this operation? We have no concept of this in Xe,
>>> e.g. we can create a VM and the entire address space is managed exactly
>>> the same.
>>>
>>> If this can be removed then the entire concept of regions in the GPUVA
>>> can be removed too (drop struct drm_gpuva_region). I say this because
>>> in Xe as I'm porting over to GPUVA the first thing I'm doing after
>>> drm_gpuva_manager_init is calling drm_gpuva_region_insert on the entire
>>> address space.
>>
>> Also, since you've been starting to use the code, this [1] is the branch I'm
>> pushing my fixes for a v2 to. It already contains the changes for the GPUVA
>> manager except for switching away from drm_mm.
>>
>> [1] https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/nouvelles/kernel/-/tree/new-uapi-drm-next-fixes
>>
>
> I will take a look at this branch. I believe you are on our Xe gitlab
> project (working on getting this public) so you can comment on any MR I
> post there, I expect to have something posted early next week to port Xe
> to the gpuva.
>
Yes, I am.
> Also I assume you are dri-devel IRC, what is your handle? Mine is
> mbrost. It might be useful to chat in real time.
Mine is dakr, I just pinged you in #dri-devel, but it seems your client
timed out shortly after, so I expect it didn't reach you.
- Danilo
>
> Matt
>
>>> To me this seems kinda useless but maybe I'm missing why
>>> you need this for Nouveau.
>>>
>>> Matt
>>>
>>>> +/**
>>>> + * @DRM_NOUVEAU_VM_BIND_OP_FREE: Free a reserved VA space region.
>>>> + */
>>>> +#define DRM_NOUVEAU_VM_BIND_OP_FREE 0x1
>>>> +/**
>>>> + * @DRM_NOUVEAU_VM_BIND_OP_MAP:
>>>> + *
>>>> + * Map a GEM object to the GPU's VA space. The mapping must be fully enclosed by
>>>> + * a previously allocated VA space region. If the region is sparse, existing
>>>> + * sparse mappings are overwritten.
>>>> + */
>>>> +#define DRM_NOUVEAU_VM_BIND_OP_MAP 0x2
>>>> +/**
>>>> + * @DRM_NOUVEAU_VM_BIND_OP_UNMAP:
>>>> + *
>>>> + * Unmap an existing mapping in the GPU's VA space. If the region the mapping
>>>> + * is located in is a sparse region, new sparse mappings are created where the
>>>> + * unmapped (memory backed) mapping was mapped previously.
>>>> + */
>>>> +#define DRM_NOUVEAU_VM_BIND_OP_UNMAP 0x3
>>>> + /**
>>>> + * @flags: the flags for a &drm_nouveau_vm_bind_op
>>>> + */
>>>> + __u32 flags;
>>>> +/**
>>>> + * @DRM_NOUVEAU_VM_BIND_SPARSE:
>>>> + *
>>>> + * Indicates that an allocated VA space region should be sparse.
>>>> + */
>>>> +#define DRM_NOUVEAU_VM_BIND_SPARSE (1 << 8)
>>>> + /**
>>>> + * @handle: the handle of the DRM GEM object to map
>>>> + */
>>>> + __u32 handle;
>>>> + /**
>>>> + * @addr:
>>>> + *
>>>> + * the address the VA space region or (memory backed) mapping should be mapped to
>>>> + */
>>>> + __u64 addr;
>>>> + /**
>>>> + * @bo_offset: the offset within the BO backing the mapping
>>>> + */
>>>> + __u64 bo_offset;
>>>> + /**
>>>> + * @range: the size of the requested mapping in bytes
>>>> + */
>>>> + __u64 range;
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +/**
>>>> + * struct drm_nouveau_vm_bind - structure for DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_VM_BIND
>>>> + */
>>>> +struct drm_nouveau_vm_bind {
>>>> + /**
>>>> + * @op_count: the number of &drm_nouveau_vm_bind_op
>>>> + */
>>>> + __u32 op_count;
>>>> + /**
>>>> + * @flags: the flags for a &drm_nouveau_vm_bind ioctl
>>>> + */
>>>> + __u32 flags;
>>>> +/**
>>>> + * @DRM_NOUVEAU_VM_BIND_RUN_ASYNC:
>>>> + *
>>>> + * Indicates that the given VM_BIND operation should be executed asynchronously
>>>> + * by the kernel.
>>>> + *
>>>> + * If this flag is not supplied the kernel executes the associated operations
>>>> + * synchronously and doesn't accept any &drm_nouveau_sync objects.
>>>> + */
>>>> +#define DRM_NOUVEAU_VM_BIND_RUN_ASYNC 0x1
>>>> + /**
>>>> + * @wait_count: the number of wait &drm_nouveau_syncs
>>>> + */
>>>> + __u32 wait_count;
>>>> + /**
>>>> + * @sig_count: the number of &drm_nouveau_syncs to signal when finished
>>>> + */
>>>> + __u32 sig_count;
>>>> + /**
>>>> + * @wait_ptr: pointer to &drm_nouveau_syncs to wait for
>>>> + */
>>>> + __u64 wait_ptr;
>>>> + /**
>>>> + * @sig_ptr: pointer to &drm_nouveau_syncs to signal when finished
>>>> + */
>>>> + __u64 sig_ptr;
>>>> + /**
>>>> + * @op_ptr: pointer to the &drm_nouveau_vm_bind_ops to execute
>>>> + */
>>>> + __u64 op_ptr;
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +/**
>>>> + * struct drm_nouveau_exec_push - EXEC push operation
>>>> + *
>>>> + * This structure represents a single EXEC push operation. UMDs should pass an
>>>> + * array of this structure via struct drm_nouveau_exec's &push_ptr field.
>>>> + */
>>>> +struct drm_nouveau_exec_push {
>>>> + /**
>>>> + * @va: the virtual address of the push buffer mapping
>>>> + */
>>>> + __u64 va;
>>>> + /**
>>>> + * @va_len: the length of the push buffer mapping
>>>> + */
>>>> + __u64 va_len;
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +/**
>>>> + * struct drm_nouveau_exec - structure for DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_EXEC
>>>> + */
>>>> +struct drm_nouveau_exec {
>>>> + /**
>>>> + * @channel: the channel to execute the push buffer in
>>>> + */
>>>> + __u32 channel;
>>>> + /**
>>>> + * @push_count: the number of &drm_nouveau_exec_push ops
>>>> + */
>>>> + __u32 push_count;
>>>> + /**
>>>> + * @wait_count: the number of wait &drm_nouveau_syncs
>>>> + */
>>>> + __u32 wait_count;
>>>> + /**
>>>> + * @sig_count: the number of &drm_nouveau_syncs to signal when finished
>>>> + */
>>>> + __u32 sig_count;
>>>> + /**
>>>> + * @wait_ptr: pointer to &drm_nouveau_syncs to wait for
>>>> + */
>>>> + __u64 wait_ptr;
>>>> + /**
>>>> + * @sig_ptr: pointer to &drm_nouveau_syncs to signal when finished
>>>> + */
>>>> + __u64 sig_ptr;
>>>> + /**
>>>> + * @push_ptr: pointer to &drm_nouveau_exec_push ops
>>>> + */
>>>> + __u64 push_ptr;
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> #define DRM_NOUVEAU_GETPARAM 0x00 /* deprecated */
>>>> #define DRM_NOUVEAU_SETPARAM 0x01 /* deprecated */
>>>> #define DRM_NOUVEAU_CHANNEL_ALLOC 0x02 /* deprecated */
>>>> @@ -136,6 +346,9 @@ struct drm_nouveau_gem_cpu_fini {
>>>> #define DRM_NOUVEAU_NVIF 0x07
>>>> #define DRM_NOUVEAU_SVM_INIT 0x08
>>>> #define DRM_NOUVEAU_SVM_BIND 0x09
>>>> +#define DRM_NOUVEAU_VM_INIT 0x10
>>>> +#define DRM_NOUVEAU_VM_BIND 0x11
>>>> +#define DRM_NOUVEAU_EXEC 0x12
>>>> #define DRM_NOUVEAU_GEM_NEW 0x40
>>>> #define DRM_NOUVEAU_GEM_PUSHBUF 0x41
>>>> #define DRM_NOUVEAU_GEM_CPU_PREP 0x42
>>>> @@ -197,6 +410,9 @@ struct drm_nouveau_svm_bind {
>>>> #define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_GEM_CPU_FINI DRM_IOW (DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_GEM_CPU_FINI, struct drm_nouveau_gem_cpu_fini)
>>>> #define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_GEM_INFO DRM_IOWR(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_GEM_INFO, struct drm_nouveau_gem_info)
>>>> +#define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_VM_INIT DRM_IOWR(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_VM_INIT, struct drm_nouveau_vm_init)
>>>> +#define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_VM_BIND DRM_IOWR(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_VM_BIND, struct drm_nouveau_vm_bind)
>>>> +#define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_EXEC DRM_IOWR(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_EXEC, struct drm_nouveau_exec)
>>>> #if defined(__cplusplus)
>>>> }
>>>> #endif
>>>> --
>>>> 2.39.0
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-27 3:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-18 6:12 [PATCH drm-next 00/14] [RFC] DRM GPUVA Manager & Nouveau VM_BIND UAPI Danilo Krummrich
2023-01-18 6:12 ` [PATCH drm-next 01/14] drm: execution context for GEM buffers Danilo Krummrich
2023-01-18 6:12 ` [PATCH drm-next 02/14] drm/exec: fix memory leak in drm_exec_prepare_obj() Danilo Krummrich
2023-01-18 8:51 ` Christian König
2023-01-18 19:00 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-01-18 6:12 ` [PATCH drm-next 03/14] drm: manager to keep track of GPUs VA mappings Danilo Krummrich
2023-01-19 4:14 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2023-01-20 18:32 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-01-23 23:23 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2023-01-26 23:43 ` Matthew Brost
2023-01-27 0:24 ` Matthew Brost
2023-02-03 17:37 ` Matthew Brost
2023-02-06 13:35 ` Christian König
2023-02-06 13:46 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-02-14 11:52 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-01-18 6:12 ` [PATCH drm-next 04/14] drm: debugfs: provide infrastructure to dump a DRM GPU VA space Danilo Krummrich
2023-01-18 13:55 ` kernel test robot
2023-01-18 15:47 ` kernel test robot
2023-01-18 6:12 ` [PATCH drm-next 05/14] drm/nouveau: new VM_BIND uapi interfaces Danilo Krummrich
2023-01-27 1:05 ` Matthew Brost
2023-01-27 1:26 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-01-27 7:55 ` Christian König
2023-01-27 13:12 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-01-27 13:23 ` Christian König
2023-01-27 14:44 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-01-27 15:17 ` Christian König
2023-01-27 20:25 ` David Airlie
2023-01-30 12:58 ` Christian König
2023-01-27 21:09 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-01-29 18:46 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-01-30 13:02 ` Christian König
2023-01-30 23:38 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-02-01 8:10 ` [Nouveau] " Dave Airlie
2023-02-02 11:53 ` Christian König
2023-02-02 18:31 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-02-06 9:48 ` Christian König
2023-02-06 13:27 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-02-06 16:14 ` Christian König
2023-02-06 18:20 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-02-07 9:35 ` Christian König
2023-02-07 10:50 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-02-10 11:50 ` Christian König
2023-02-10 12:47 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-01-27 1:43 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-01-27 3:21 ` Matthew Brost
2023-01-27 3:33 ` Danilo Krummrich [this message]
2023-01-18 6:12 ` [PATCH drm-next 06/14] drm/nouveau: get vmm via nouveau_cli_vmm() Danilo Krummrich
2023-01-18 6:12 ` [PATCH drm-next 07/14] drm/nouveau: bo: initialize GEM GPU VA interface Danilo Krummrich
2023-01-18 6:12 ` [PATCH drm-next 08/14] drm/nouveau: move usercopy helpers to nouveau_drv.h Danilo Krummrich
2023-01-18 6:12 ` [PATCH drm-next 09/14] drm/nouveau: fence: fail to emit when fence context is killed Danilo Krummrich
2023-01-18 6:12 ` [PATCH drm-next 10/14] drm/nouveau: chan: provide nouveau_channel_kill() Danilo Krummrich
2023-01-18 6:12 ` [PATCH drm-next 11/14] drm/nouveau: nvkm/vmm: implement raw ops to manage uvmm Danilo Krummrich
2023-01-20 3:37 ` kernel test robot
2023-01-18 6:12 ` [PATCH drm-next 12/14] drm/nouveau: implement uvmm for user mode bindings Danilo Krummrich
2023-01-18 6:12 ` [PATCH drm-next 13/14] drm/nouveau: implement new VM_BIND UAPI Danilo Krummrich
2023-01-18 20:37 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2023-01-19 3:44 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-01-19 4:58 ` Matthew Brost
2023-01-19 7:32 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2023-01-20 10:08 ` Boris Brezillon
2023-01-18 6:12 ` [PATCH drm-next 14/14] drm/nouveau: debugfs: implement DRM GPU VA debugfs Danilo Krummrich
2023-01-18 8:53 ` [PATCH drm-next 00/14] [RFC] DRM GPUVA Manager & Nouveau VM_BIND UAPI Christian König
2023-01-18 15:34 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-01-18 15:37 ` Christian König
2023-01-18 16:19 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-01-18 16:30 ` Alex Deucher
2023-01-18 16:50 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-01-18 16:54 ` Alex Deucher
2023-01-18 19:17 ` Dave Airlie
2023-01-18 19:48 ` Christian König
2023-01-19 4:04 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-01-19 5:23 ` Matthew Brost
2023-01-19 11:33 ` drm_gpuva_manager requirements (was Re: [PATCH drm-next 00/14] [RFC] DRM GPUVA Manager & Nouveau VM_BIND UAPI) Christian König
2023-02-06 14:48 ` [PATCH drm-next 00/14] [RFC] DRM GPUVA Manager & Nouveau VM_BIND UAPI Oded Gabbay
2023-03-16 16:39 ` Danilo Krummrich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c684cbed-c6a9-f863-fac0-a9ee6af35b23@redhat.com \
--to=dakr@redhat.com \
--cc=airlied@redhat.com \
--cc=bskeggs@redhat.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jason@jlekstrand.net \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).