Re: [PATCH 3/3] drm: docs: Remove completed task from drm TODO list

[Tejas Vipin <tejasvipin76@gmail.com>]

Hi,

On 7/7/25 1:26 PM, Brigham Campbell wrote:
> Remove TODO item from drm documentation to transition away from using
> mipi_dsi_*_write_seq() macros now that the work is complete.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Brigham Campbell <me@brighamcampbell.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/gpu/todo.rst | 18 ------------------
>  1 file changed, 18 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/gpu/todo.rst b/Documentation/gpu/todo.rst
> index be8637da3fe9..76afb8a784e3 100644
> --- a/Documentation/gpu/todo.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/gpu/todo.rst
> @@ -497,24 +497,6 @@ Contact: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
>  
>  Level: Intermediate
>  
> -Transition away from using mipi_dsi_*_write_seq()
> --------------------------------------------------
> -
> -The macros mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq() and mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq() are
> -non-intuitive because, if there are errors, they return out of the *caller's*
> -function. We should move all callers to use mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq_multi()
> -and mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi() macros instead.
> -
> -Once all callers are transitioned, the macros and the functions that they call,
> -mipi_dsi_generic_write_chatty() and mipi_dsi_dcs_write_buffer_chatty(), can
> -probably be removed. Alternatively, if people feel like the _multi() variants
> -are overkill for some use cases, we could keep the mipi_dsi_*_write_seq()
> -variants but change them not to return out of the caller.
> -
> -Contact: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
> -
> -Level: Starter
> -
>  Remove devm_drm_put_bridge()
>  ----------------------------
>  

Personally I think there's merit in keeping this TODO around until all
the other mipi_dsi functions are transitioned as well and removed
entirely. Maybe rewording it to reflect this could be better?

-- 
Tejas Vipin