linux-doc.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
To: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@vaga.pv.it>,
	Alex Shi <alexs@kernel.org>, Yanteng Si <siyanteng@loongson.cn>,
	Hu Haowen <src.res@email.cn>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-doc-tw-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.com>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
	linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/11] docs: remove submitting-drivers.rst
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2022 09:50:15 +0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c7c21381-fa1c-a67a-e5e0-ac590fe0612f@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220627151819.22694-1-lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>

On 6/27/22 22:18, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> As future work---with this one submitting checklist gone---I see the harder
> follow-up task to synchronize and clean up the various submission hints/
> guidelines/checklists in the remaining kernel documentation that partly
> overlap and differ in detail, their structure (unstructured, unordered
> lists vs. sections and subsections) and their state of being outdated:
> 
>   Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst
>   Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
>   MAINTAINERS#Tips for patch submitters
> 
> My next task at hand is to read through all three documents, figure out
> what still applies and what is outdated, determine a good common structure
> for all three documents, include cross-links and make them to some extent
> follow a clear consistent policy. E.g., one document is a more detailed
> description of everything mentioned in the short list of another document.
> I will try to work through that in the next months or motivate and guide
> some colleague or mentee to work together with me on that.
> 

Hi,

I think MAINTAINERS#Tips for patch submitters contains redundant info
compared to other submission guidelines, and some tips there are outdated
(like using `diff -u` instead of git). For consistency, that section can
be removed (in your next RFC series).

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-06-28  2:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-27 15:18 [RFC PATCH 00/11] docs: remove submitting-drivers.rst Lukas Bulwahn
2022-06-27 15:18 ` [RFC PATCH 01/11] docs: kernel-docs: order reference from newest to oldest Lukas Bulwahn
2022-06-27 15:18 ` [RFC PATCH 02/11] docs: kernel-docs: shorten the lengthy doc title Lukas Bulwahn
2022-06-27 15:18 ` [RFC PATCH 03/11] docs: kernel-docs: reflect that it is community-maintained Lukas Bulwahn
2022-06-27 15:18 ` [RFC PATCH 04/11] docs: kernel-docs: add a reference mentioned in submitting-drivers.rst Lukas Bulwahn
2022-06-27 15:18 ` [RFC PATCH 05/11] docs: admin: devices: drop confusing outdated statement on Latex Lukas Bulwahn
2022-06-27 15:18 ` [RFC PATCH 06/11] docs: process: remove outdated submitting-drivers.rst Lukas Bulwahn
2022-06-28  1:20   ` Bagas Sanjaya
2022-06-28  5:00     ` Lukas Bulwahn
2022-06-28  6:40       ` Bagas Sanjaya
2022-06-27 15:18 ` [RFC PATCH 07/11] docs: it_IT: align to submitting-drivers removal Lukas Bulwahn
2022-06-28  9:16   ` Federico Vaga
2022-06-28 10:27     ` Lukas Bulwahn
2022-07-04  9:49     ` Lukas Bulwahn
2022-07-04 10:59       ` Federico Vaga
2022-06-27 15:18 ` [RFC PATCH 08/11] docs: ja_JP: howto: remove reference to removed submitting-drivers Lukas Bulwahn
2022-06-28  5:25   ` Akira Yokosawa
2022-06-28 10:24     ` Lukas Bulwahn
2022-06-27 15:18 ` [RFC PATCH 09/11] docs: ko_KR: " Lukas Bulwahn
2022-06-27 15:18 ` [RFC PATCH 10/11] docs: zh_CN: align to submitting-drivers removal Lukas Bulwahn
2022-06-29  6:40   ` Alex Shi
2022-06-27 15:18 ` [RFC PATCH 11/11] docs: zh_TW: " Lukas Bulwahn
2022-06-28  2:50 ` Bagas Sanjaya [this message]
2022-06-28  4:52   ` [RFC PATCH 00/11] docs: remove submitting-drivers.rst Lukas Bulwahn
2022-06-30 17:26 ` Jonathan Corbet
2022-07-04 13:02   ` Lukas Bulwahn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c7c21381-fa1c-a67a-e5e0-ac590fe0612f@gmail.com \
    --to=bagasdotme@gmail.com \
    --cc=alexs@kernel.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=federico.vaga@vaga.pv.it \
    --cc=jdelvare@suse.com \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc-tw-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com \
    --cc=siyanteng@loongson.cn \
    --cc=src.res@email.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).