Re: [PATCH v5 06/20] x86/resctrl: Add support to enable/disable AMD ABMC feature

[Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>]

Hi Babu,

On 7/16/24 11:48 AM, Moger, Babu wrote:
> On 7/16/24 12:51, Reinette Chatre wrote:
>> On 7/16/24 8:13 AM, Moger, Babu wrote:
>>> On 7/12/24 17:05, Reinette Chatre wrote:
>>>> On 7/3/24 2:48 PM, Babu Moger wrote:

>>>>> @@ -491,6 +495,7 @@ struct rdt_hw_resource {
>>>>>         unsigned int        mbm_width;
>>>>>         unsigned int        mbm_cfg_mask;
>>>>>         bool            cdp_enabled;
>>>>> +    bool            abmc_enabled;
>>>>>     };
>>>>
>>>> mbm_cntr_enabled? This is architecture specific code so there is more
>>>> flexibility
>>>> here, but it may make implementation easier to understand if consistent
>>>> naming is used
>>>> between fs and arch code.
>>>
>>> How about "mbm_cntr_assign_enabled" or "cntr_assign_enabled" ?
>>
>> My preference is to keep the term "mbm_cntr" to be consistent with the
>> other variables/struct members to help when reading the code.
>> "mbm_cntr_assign_enabled" does seem to be getting long though.
>> Are you planning to use it by assigning it to a local variable with shorter
>> name?
> 
> Yes. We can do that.

ok. It is not clear to me how this will turn out. I'm afraid the length may
start to be cumbersome, but we can see how it turns out.

Reinette