linux-doc.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Moger, Babu" <babu.moger@amd.com>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
	corbet@lwn.net, tony.luck@intel.com, Dave.Martin@arm.com,
	james.morse@arm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
	bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com
Cc: x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	paulmck@kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, Neeraj.Upadhyay@amd.com,
	david@redhat.com, arnd@arndb.de, fvdl@google.com,
	seanjc@google.com, thomas.lendacky@amd.com,
	pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com, yosry.ahmed@linux.dev,
	sohil.mehta@intel.com, xin@zytor.com, kai.huang@intel.com,
	xiaoyao.li@intel.com, peterz@infradead.org, me@mixaill.net,
	mario.limonciello@amd.com, xin3.li@intel.com,
	ebiggers@google.com, ak@linux.intel.com,
	chang.seok.bae@intel.com, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com,
	perry.yuan@amd.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, manali.shukla@amd.com,
	gautham.shenoy@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 06/10] fs/resctrl: Add user interface to enable/disable io_alloc feature
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2025 15:39:43 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d11e20c1-1162-422f-8915-97efa69644c7@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d5438a53-c803-4704-84db-1da019f50a3d@amd.com>


On 8/22/25 17:53, Moger, Babu wrote:
> Hi Reinette,
> 
> On 8/7/2025 8:49 PM, Reinette Chatre wrote:
>> Hi Babu,
>>
>> On 8/5/25 4:30 PM, Babu Moger wrote:
>>> "io_alloc" feature in resctrl enables direct insertion of data from I/O
>>> devices into the cache.
>>>
>>> On AMD systems, when io_alloc is enabled, the highest CLOSID is reserved
>>> exclusively for I/O allocation traffic and is no longer available for
>>> general CPU cache allocation. Users are encouraged to enable it only when
>>> running workloads that can benefit from this functionality.
>>>
>>> Since CLOSIDs are managed by resctrl fs, it is least invasive to make the
>>> "io_alloc is supported by maximum supported CLOSID" part of the initial
>>> resctrl fs support for io_alloc. Take care not to expose this use of
>>> CLOSID
>>> for io_alloc to user space so that this is not required from other
>>> architectures that may support io_alloc differently in the future.
>>>
>>> Introduce user interface to enable/disable io_alloc feature.
>> Please include high level overview of what this patch does to enable
>> and disable io_alloc. Doing so will help connect why the changelog contains
>> information about CLOSID management.
> 
> 
> Sure.
> 
>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/resctrl/ctrlmondata.c b/fs/resctrl/ctrlmondata.c
>>> index d495a5d5c9d5..bf982eab7b18 100644
>>> --- a/fs/resctrl/ctrlmondata.c
>>> +++ b/fs/resctrl/ctrlmondata.c
>>> @@ -685,3 +685,140 @@ int resctrl_io_alloc_show(struct kernfs_open_file
>>> *of, struct seq_file *seq, voi
>>>         return 0;
>>>   }
>>> +
>>> +/*
>>> + * resctrl_io_alloc_closid_supported() - io_alloc feature utilizes the
>>> + * highest CLOSID value to direct I/O traffic. Ensure that
>>> io_alloc_closid
>>> + * is in the supported range.
>>> + */
>>> +static bool resctrl_io_alloc_closid_supported(u32 io_alloc_closid)
>>> +{
>>> +    return io_alloc_closid < closids_supported();
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static struct resctrl_schema *resctrl_get_schema(enum
>>> resctrl_conf_type type)
>>> +{
>>> +    struct resctrl_schema *schema;
>>> +
>>> +    list_for_each_entry(schema, &resctrl_schema_all, list) {
>>> +        if (schema->conf_type == type)
>>> +            return schema;
>> This does not look right. More than one resource can have the same
>> configuration type, no?
>> Think about L2 and L3 having CDP enabled ...
>> Looks like this is missing a resource type as parameter and a check for
>> the resource ...
>> but is this function even necessary (more below)?
> 
> May not be required.  Comments below.
> 
>>
>>> +    }
>>> +
>>> +    return NULL;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +/*
>>> + * Initialize io_alloc CLOSID cache resource CBM with all usable (shared
>>> + * and unused) cache portions.
>>> + */
>>> +static int resctrl_io_alloc_init_cbm(struct resctrl_schema *s, u32
>>> closid)
>>> +{
>>> +    struct rdt_resource *r = s->res;
>> Needs reverse fir.
> 
> 
> Sure.
> 
>>
>>> +    enum resctrl_conf_type peer_type;
>>> +    struct resctrl_schema *peer_s;
>>> +    int ret;
>>> +
>>> +    rdt_staged_configs_clear();
>>> +
>>> +    ret = rdtgroup_init_cat(s, closid);
>>> +    if (ret < 0)
>>> +        goto out;
>>> +
>>> +    /* Initialize schema for both CDP_DATA and CDP_CODE when CDP is
>>> enabled */
>>> +    if (resctrl_arch_get_cdp_enabled(r->rid)) {
>>> +        peer_type = resctrl_peer_type(s->conf_type);
>>> +        peer_s = resctrl_get_schema(peer_type);
>>> +        if (peer_s) {
>>> +            ret = rdtgroup_init_cat(peer_s, closid);
>> This is unexpected. In v7 I suggested that when parsing the CBM of one
>> of the CDP
>> resources it is not necessary to do so again for the peer. The CBM can be
>> parsed *once* and the configuration just copied over. See:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/
>> lkml/82045638-2b26-4682-9374-1c3e400a580a@intel.com/
> 
> Let met try to understand.
> 
> So, rdtgroup_init_cat() sets up the staged _config for the specific CDP
> type for all the domains.
> 
> We need to apply those staged_configs to its peer type on all the domains.
> 
> Something like this?
> 
> /* Initialize staged_config of the peer type when CDP is enabled */
>         if (resctrl_arch_get_cdp_enabled(r->rid)) {
>                 list_for_each_entry(d, &s->res->ctrl_domains, hdr.list) {
>                         cfg = &d->staged_config[s->conf_type];
>                         cfg_peer = &d->staged_config[peer_type];
>                         cfg_peer->new_ctrl = cfg->new_ctrl;
>                         cfg_peer->have_new_ctrl = cfg->have_new_ctrl;
>                 }
>         }
> 

Replaced with following snippet.

/* Initialize schema for both CDP_DATA and CDP_CODE when CDP is enabled */
+	if (resctrl_arch_get_cdp_enabled(r->rid)) {
+		peer_type = resctrl_peer_type(s->conf_type);
+		list_for_each_entry(d, &s->res->ctrl_domains, hdr.list)
+			memcpy(&d->staged_config[peer_type],
+			       &d->staged_config[s->conf_type],
+			       sizeof(*d->staged_config));
+	}



> 
>>
>> Generally when feedback is provided it is good to check all places in
>> series where
>> it is relevant. oh ... but looking ahead you ignored the feedback in the
>> patch
>> it was given also :(
> 
> 
> My bad.
> 
> I will address that.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Babu
> 
> 

-- 
Thanks
Babu Moger


  reply	other threads:[~2025-08-27 20:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-05 23:30 [PATCH v8 00/10] x86,fs/resctrl: Support L3 Smart Data Cache Injection Allocation Enforcement (SDCIAE) Babu Moger
2025-08-05 23:30 ` [PATCH v8 01/10] x86/cpufeatures: Add support for L3 Smart Data Cache Injection Allocation Enforcement Babu Moger
2025-08-05 23:30 ` [PATCH v8 02/10] x86/resctrl: Add SDCIAE feature in the command line options Babu Moger
2025-08-08  1:44   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-08-22 22:07     ` Moger, Babu
2025-08-05 23:30 ` [PATCH v8 03/10] x86,fs/resctrl: Detect io_alloc feature Babu Moger
2025-08-05 23:30 ` [PATCH v8 04/10] x86,fs/resctrl: Implement "io_alloc" enable/disable handlers Babu Moger
2025-08-08  1:47   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-08-22 22:10     ` Moger, Babu
2025-08-05 23:30 ` [PATCH v8 05/10] fs/resctrl: Introduce interface to display "io_alloc" support Babu Moger
2025-08-08  1:48   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-08-22 22:12     ` Moger, Babu
2025-08-05 23:30 ` [PATCH v8 06/10] fs/resctrl: Add user interface to enable/disable io_alloc feature Babu Moger
2025-08-08  1:49   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-08-22 22:53     ` Moger, Babu
2025-08-27 20:39       ` Moger, Babu [this message]
2025-08-29  2:47         ` Reinette Chatre
2025-09-02 16:20           ` Moger, Babu
2025-08-21  5:02   ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-08-22 23:10     ` Moger, Babu
2025-08-05 23:30 ` [PATCH v8 07/10] fs/resctrl: Introduce interface to display io_alloc CBMs Babu Moger
2025-08-08  1:51   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-08-26 18:33     ` Moger, Babu
2025-08-05 23:30 ` [PATCH v8 08/10] fs/resctrl: Modify rdt_parse_data to pass mode and CLOSID Babu Moger
2025-08-08  1:52   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-08-26 18:40     ` Moger, Babu
2025-08-05 23:30 ` [PATCH v8 09/10] fs/resctrl: Introduce interface to modify io_alloc Capacity Bit Masks Babu Moger
2025-08-08  1:53   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-08-26 18:53     ` Moger, Babu
2025-08-05 23:30 ` [PATCH v8 10/10] fs/resctrl: Update bit_usage to reflect io_alloc Babu Moger
2025-08-08  1:54   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-08-26 22:51     ` Moger, Babu
2025-08-29  3:11       ` Reinette Chatre
2025-09-02 16:32         ` Moger, Babu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d11e20c1-1162-422f-8915-97efa69644c7@amd.com \
    --to=babu.moger@amd.com \
    --cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
    --cc=Neeraj.Upadhyay@amd.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=ebiggers@google.com \
    --cc=fvdl@google.com \
    --cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=manali.shukla@amd.com \
    --cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
    --cc=me@mixaill.net \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=perry.yuan@amd.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=sohil.mehta@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
    --cc=xin3.li@intel.com \
    --cc=xin@zytor.com \
    --cc=yosry.ahmed@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).