From: Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
"Moger, Babu" <bmoger@amd.com>,
tony.luck@intel.com, bp@alien8.de
Cc: x86@kernel.org, Dave.Martin@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com,
corbet@lwn.net, skhan@linuxfoundation.org, rdunlap@infradead.org,
tglx@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
hpa@zytor.com, kas@kernel.org, rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-coco@lists.linux.dev, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] fs/resctrl: Assign counters to existing groups when enabling mbm_event
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2026 08:33:21 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d8bf2738-6eff-4b0b-a045-ff1134090bdf@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3e7f1507-2a82-44a1-a06b-52b6a49d971c@intel.com>
Hi Reinette,
On 10/12/26 21:16, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> Hi Babu,
>
> On 10/12/26 6:02 PM, Moger, Babu wrote:
>> On 10/12/2026 1:44 PM, Reinette Chatre wrote:
>>> On 10/9/26 4:44 PM, Babu Moger wrote:
>
> ...
>
>>>> @@ -1611,6 +1627,19 @@ ssize_t resctrl_mbm_assign_mode_write(struct kernfs_open_file *of, char *buf,
>>>> mbm_cntr_free_all(r, d);
>>>> resctrl_reset_rmid_all(r, d);
>>>> }
>>>> +
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * Counters were freed above, so both new groups (via mkdir) and
>>>> + * the groups that already exist need assignments. Groups created
>>>> + * while in "default" mode have no counter assigned, including the
>>>> + * default group created when resctrl is mounted. Assign counters
>>>
>>> This patch refers three times to how "default group" receives counters during auto assignment.
>>>
>>> How important is it that the default group is assigned counters when switching to "mbm_event" mode?
>>>
>>> This patch implies that auto assignment will always include the default group but that cannot be
>>> guaranteed since the default group is always at the end of the rdt_all_groups list. This means
>>> that when traversing rdt_all_groups in resctrl_assign_cntrs_allrdtgrp(), whether default group
>>> receives counters would depend on how many other CTRL_MON and MON groups there are.
>>
>> Good point. I recreated the problem. It is not always guaranteed that the default group gets the counter with the current logic.
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> + * to them so that enabling the mode leaves the same assignments
>>>> + * that mkdir would have made.
>>>
>>> Related to previous comment is that the changelog mentions "same per-group state that auto-assignment
>>> would have produced" that repeats a similat claim made above that states "same assignments that mkdir
>>> would have made". This behavior assumes that a CTRL_MON group is created with all its MON groups before
>>> the next CTRL_MON group is created *and* that enough counters are available for all groups. If
>>> there are not enough counters then the most recent CTRL_MON groups will receive counters first potentially
>>> leaving the first "mkdir" created CTRL_MON groups without counters.
>>>
>>> It is not clear to me whether default group requires counters. Separately, I do not see whether resctrl
>>> can or should support the same ordering as what "mkdir" would have produced. If these are not actually
>>> requirements then the patch is fine but the comments, documentation change, and changelog need to change
>>> to match the code.
>>>
>>> If the default group does require counters then we either need to change how groups
>>> are added to rdt_all_groups or how resctrl_assign_cntrs_allrdtgrp() traverses the list.
>>
>>
>> We have always treated the default group as a special case. I think
>
> In general I think the special treatment results from the default group
> always being present. It is not clear to me that this implies that the default
> group needs to have counters assigned when switching to mbm_event mode.
>
>
>> we should ensure that the default group gets counters before any
>> other group. How about adding logic to give the default group
>> priority when assigning counters?
>
> I do not find there to be a strong motivation for this assignment but it
> should be fine to establish such expectation at this point. Just to confirm, you
> explicitly only consider the default group and not also the monitoring groups
> belonging to the default group?
It is just the default group. Not the monitoring group under the default
group.
>
>> How about something like this?
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/resctrl/monitor.c b/fs/resctrl/monitor.c
>> index 9e705eafe873..5f3711d78a19 100644
>> --- a/fs/resctrl/monitor.c
>> +++ b/fs/resctrl/monitor.c
>> @@ -1339,8 +1339,10 @@ static void resctrl_assign_cntrs_allrdtgrp(void)
>> {
>> struct rdtgroup *prgrp, *crgrp;
>>
>> + rdtgroup_assign_cntrs(&rdtgroup_default);
>> list_for_each_entry(prgrp, &rdt_all_groups, rdtgroup_list) {
>> - rdtgroup_assign_cntrs(prgrp);
>> + if(prgrp != &rdtgroup_default)
>> + rdtgroup_assign_cntrs(prgrp);
>>
>> list_for_each_entry(crgrp, &prgrp->mon.crdtgrp_list, mon.crdtgrp_list)
>> rdtgroup_assign_cntrs(crgrp);
>>
>>
>
> ok. If you go this route, please add a small comment to highlight why the list
> traversal is done in this unexpected way. If you do so, please take care with
> potential duplicate comments between this function and its caller.
ok.
>
> I do not have a preference about which groups need counters assigned when
> switching to mbm_event mode. Please just ensure that the documentation (resctrl.rst,
> changelog, code comments) match the behavior and explains why.
Ok.
Thanks
Babu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-13 13:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-09 23:44 [PATCH v4 0/3] x86,fs/resctrl: Keep default MBM mode at boot and fix ABMC programming Babu Moger
2026-10-09 23:44 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] x86/resctrl: Fix ABMC counter programming Babu Moger
2026-10-12 18:40 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-10-13 1:00 ` Moger, Babu
2026-10-09 23:44 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] fs/resctrl: Assign counters to existing groups when enabling mbm_event Babu Moger
2026-10-12 18:44 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-10-13 1:02 ` Moger, Babu
2026-10-13 2:16 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-10-13 13:33 ` Babu Moger [this message]
2026-10-13 15:57 ` Ben Horgan
2026-10-13 16:51 ` Babu Moger
2026-10-13 18:22 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-10-13 18:52 ` Babu Moger
2026-10-09 23:44 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] x86,fs/resctrl: Keep mbm_assign_mode in default mode at boot Babu Moger
2026-10-12 18:47 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-10-13 1:09 ` Babu Moger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d8bf2738-6eff-4b0b-a045-ff1134090bdf@amd.com \
--to=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=bmoger@amd.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=kas@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox