Re: [PATCH 3/7] x86/resctrl: Introduce sdciae_capable in rdt_resource

[Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>]

Hi Babu,

On 9/18/24 11:22 AM, Moger, Babu wrote:
> 
> 
> On 9/18/24 10:27, Moger, Babu wrote:
>> Hi Reinette,
>>
>> On 9/13/24 15:45, Reinette Chatre wrote:
>>> Hi Babu,
>>>
>>> On 8/16/24 9:16 AM, Babu Moger wrote:
>>>> Detect SDCIAE`(L3 Smart Data Cache Injection Allocation Enforcement)
>>>
>>> (stray ` char)
>>
>> Sure.
>>
>>>
>>>> feature and initialize sdciae_capable.
>>>
>>> (This is a repeat of the discussion we had surrounding the ABMC feature.)
>>>
>>> By adding "sdciae_capable" to struct rdt_resource the "sdciae" feature
>>> becomes a resctrl fs feature. Any other architecture that has a "similar
>>> but perhaps not identical feature to AMD's SDCIAE" will be forced to also
>>> call it "sdciae" ... sdciae seems like a marketing name to me and resctrl
>>> needs something generic that could later be built on (if needed) by other
>>> architectures.
>>
>> How about "cache_inject_capable" ?
>>
>> This seems generic. I will change the description also.
>>
> 
> Basically, this feature reserves specific CLOS for SDCI cache.
> 
> We can also name "clos_reserve_capable".

Naming is always complicated. I think we should try to stay away from
"clos" in a generic name since that creates problem when trying to
apply it to Arm and is very specific to how AMD implements this
feature. "cache_inject_capable" does sound much better to me ...
it also looks like this may be more appropriate as a property
of struct resctrl_cache?

Reinette