From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from desiato.infradead.org (desiato.infradead.org [90.155.92.199]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DD052DE6FC; Thu, 3 Jul 2025 06:06:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=90.155.92.199 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1751522811; cv=none; b=fs98lCUS29TMsMv1s75W24QyOjGVBY79iNxotU1G8Gb9x+aryTzwlsCVr6g58v5A6nRwLuBNiyB2VakICYGs/V1krl0sgeFv1A56VU7DTWL8nG3bY9sHgV77yNomPqtqeYQpn1iUHPenUB5i5mt6nOjRBcZCniBRBrkr/IIhUAI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1751522811; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ZWevuLWSVkn7zLvbrsg0RjkiqNUHWiRxWj0YkUftYgg=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=kn2IfkVnEdW00C55EYtLBZL39yjadBNfIU/B0wualLy2TRAUUVCYz4DbnRbiaYR0kaYakTfGEiZAYIq/cXYgp2/WgloXKQyZbDWBaSwlRsJ+Lin6tVZEGs+Pooc8KLbK8ROTOnsJVq84sOAvkuaWMjeEG6M+jqszqkRgfgfbE0Q= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b=Caut9X/f; arc=none smtp.client-ip=90.155.92.199 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="Caut9X/f" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=desiato.20200630; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type :In-Reply-To:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID: Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=Eq8Y+1V8pSfxkXgAiYTfXGDFT7NGn0VC8yVA5xBBUcg=; b=Caut9X/fhXkPrD5BaBbuS+nYa+ 0+f1u6XTd2CVxemF2eYW6Cz3Eixh1qfUZSjbZwD2qs5XE9iM5k5NFzj2iPPEmLk0SIOoZk4qwrBaM FDP43dda2nObGQOU7fr9HJq2GpuNs5Mig7xt7tk8M1T0aJc9FWudqTSKAjP9bA9bCxTBlpbT555ig NQmP49ZHwX4CDsAxxoyvC15tKG91iLnf3CWkiHMPhJ4/351P6mQXm937SLOkVvIoyI2Mgn+ixIhmB HpctLG+cHWmWSqecrmKBs/VnW+1ObDpffr9bLHd+2YBhLgrepmSLhPmUQByKV/5ANMQj6ZocZE1wb NixVyA6g==; Received: from [50.53.25.54] (helo=[192.168.254.17]) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uXD5p-00000007d5o-49rZ; Thu, 03 Jul 2025 06:06:46 +0000 Message-ID: Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2025 23:06:42 -0700 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] docs: document linked lists To: Bagas Sanjaya , Nicolas Frattaroli , Jonathan Corbet Cc: kernel@collabora.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20250702-linked-list-docs-v2-1-e36532f4b638@collabora.com> <194f16f5-4e26-460f-ae4c-8a5f93088fae@infradead.org> <70ef2227-55ac-482b-9bcc-df1fd847abd9@gmail.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Randy Dunlap In-Reply-To: <70ef2227-55ac-482b-9bcc-df1fd847abd9@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 7/2/25 10:48 PM, Bagas Sanjaya wrote: > On 7/3/25 11:16, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> >> >> On 7/2/25 8:24 PM, Bagas Sanjaya wrote: >>> On Wed, Jul 02, 2025 at 10:24:47PM +0200, Nicolas Frattaroli wrote: >>>> diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/list.rst b/Documentation/core-api/list.rst >>>> new file mode 100644 >>>> index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b0586056abb04d2bcc4518f7238ff9a94d3dd774 >>>> --- /dev/null >>>> +++ b/Documentation/core-api/list.rst >>>> @@ -0,0 +1,847 @@ >> >> [snip] >> >>> >>> The text LGTM, thanks! >>> >>> Reviewed-by: Bagas Sanjaya >>> >> >> Please see https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette, >> especially "Trim replies". >> > > I did quote the whole diff to provide review context... > If you had commented on any specific lines in the patch, then that would be necessary. Even if you were commenting on only a few lines of the patch, most of the patch lines could be snipped out. The Subject: gives us the review context. It's pointless & annoying to other readers to have to scroll down thru an 847-line patch to see any kind of Tagged-by: reply. thanks. -- ~Randy