linux-doc.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Graf <graf@amazon.com>
To: Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@google.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	KarimAllah Raslan <karahmed@amazon.de>,
	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
	kvm list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 5/7] KVM: x86: VMX: Prevent MSR passthrough when MSR access is denied
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 22:36:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e61772b5-4c64-8407-2b52-dbba2d488f90@amazon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAAPnDEoQhtXuiqHwUtrsL7codcToAVwaR=+qVczZrz6RCWe0A@mail.gmail.com>



On 16.09.20 22:13, Aaron Lewis wrote:
> 
>>>
>>>> +
>>>>    /*
>>>>     * These 2 parameters are used to config the controls for Pause-Loop Exiting:
>>>>     * ple_gap:    upper bound on the amount of time between two successive
>>>> @@ -622,6 +642,41 @@ static inline bool report_flexpriority(void)
>>>>           return flexpriority_enabled;
>>>>    }
>>>
>>> One thing that seems to be missing is removing MSRs from the
>>> permission bitmap or resetting the permission bitmap to its original
>>> state before adding changes on top of it.  This would be needed on
>>> subsequent calls to kvm_vm_ioctl_set_msr_filter().  When that happens
>>> the original changes made by KVM_REQ_MSR_FILTER_CHANGED need to be
>>> backed out before applying the new set.
>>
>> I'm not sure I follow. Subsequent calls to set_msr_filter() will invoke
>> the "please reset the whole MSR passthrough bitmap to a consistent
>> state" which will then reapply the in-kvm desired state through the
>> bitmap and filter state on top on each of those.
>>
> 
> Yes, you're correct.  I discovered this after the fact by adding a
> test to the selftest I wrote for the deny list system which I revamped
> to work for your filter system.  It proved the permission bitmaps are
> in fact set as expected on subsequent calls.  You can disregard this
> comment.
> 
> As a side note, I'm happy to share the test if you'd like. I also used
> it to uncover an issue in the first commit of this series.

I really enjoy the tests that you submitted and would love to see you 
add your test coverage to the filtering patch set :)


Thanks!

Alex




Amazon Development Center Germany GmbH
Krausenstr. 38
10117 Berlin
Geschaeftsfuehrung: Christian Schlaeger, Jonathan Weiss
Eingetragen am Amtsgericht Charlottenburg unter HRB 149173 B
Sitz: Berlin
Ust-ID: DE 289 237 879



  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-16 20:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-02 12:59 [PATCH v6 0/7] Allow user space to restrict and augment MSR emulation Alexander Graf
2020-09-02 12:59 ` [PATCH v6 1/7] KVM: x86: Deflect unknown MSR accesses to user space Alexander Graf
2020-09-03 19:27   ` Aaron Lewis
2020-09-16  9:31     ` Alexander Graf
2020-09-16 17:08       ` Sean Christopherson
2020-09-16 19:15         ` Alexander Graf
2020-09-17 19:38       ` Aaron Lewis
2020-09-02 12:59 ` [PATCH v6 2/7] KVM: x86: Add infrastructure for MSR filtering Alexander Graf
2020-09-02 12:59 ` [PATCH v6 3/7] KVM: x86: Prepare MSR bitmaps for userspace tracked MSRs Alexander Graf
2020-09-02 12:59 ` [PATCH v6 4/7] KVM: x86: SVM: Prevent MSR passthrough when MSR access is denied Alexander Graf
2020-09-02 12:59 ` [PATCH v6 5/7] KVM: x86: VMX: " Alexander Graf
2020-09-04  2:18   ` Aaron Lewis
2020-09-16 19:44     ` Alexander Graf
2020-09-16 20:13       ` Aaron Lewis
2020-09-16 20:36         ` Alexander Graf [this message]
2020-09-02 12:59 ` [PATCH v6 6/7] KVM: x86: Introduce MSR filtering Alexander Graf
2020-09-02 12:59 ` [PATCH v6 7/7] KVM: selftests: Add test for user space MSR handling Alexander Graf
2020-09-03 19:31   ` Aaron Lewis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e61772b5-4c64-8407-2b52-dbba2d488f90@amazon.com \
    --to=graf@amazon.com \
    --cc=aaronlewis@google.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=karahmed@amazon.de \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).