Re: [PATCH v2 56/57] docs: irqdomain: Update

[Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>]

On 19. 03. 25, 19:01, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> @@ -15,45 +15,64 @@ such as GPIO controllers avoid reimplementing identical callback
>>   mechanisms as the IRQ core system by modelling their interrupt
>>   handlers as irqchips. I.e. in effect cascading interrupt controllers.
>>   
>> -Here the interrupt number loose all kind of correspondence to
>> -hardware interrupt numbers: whereas in the past, IRQ numbers could
>> -be chosen so they matched the hardware IRQ line into the root
>> -interrupt controller (i.e. the component actually fireing the
>> -interrupt line to the CPU) nowadays this number is just a number.
>> +So in the past, IRQ numbers could be chosen so that they match the
>> +hardware IRQ line into the root interrupt controller (i.e. the
>> +component actually firing the interrupt line to the CPU). Nowadays,
>> +this number is just a number and the number loose all kind of
> 
>                                                 loses

Thanks, fixed in 55/57 where I explicitly do "3rd person -> add 's' to 
verbs.". Even though this was "loose" and not "lose" ;).

-- 
js
suse labs