linux-doc.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>
To: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	"Bird, Tim" <Tim.Bird@sony.com>,
	Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>,
	Rae Moar <rmr167@gmail.com>,
	Guillaume Tucker <guillaume.tucker@collabora.com>,
	Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>,
	kernelci@groups.io,
	KUnit Development <kunit-dev@googlegroups.com>,
	"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
	<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] Documentation: dev-tools: KTAP spec change version to 2-rc
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 18:25:49 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ee73ec15-db6c-e0bb-ddb1-012499d08b11@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABVgOSm_rQcBhbC5C7Z7_+zEheCjkjHCmzKHyx7b5bYLESvA0A@mail.gmail.com>

On 3/17/22 03:43, David Gow wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 4:26 AM <frowand.list@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> From: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com>
>>
>> Prepare KTAP Specification for the process of creating Version 2.
>> The version will remain 2-rc until the final commit to complete
>> Version 2.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com>
>> ---
> 
> This seems okay to me, though I'd generally rather this stay in a
> branch rather than hitting torvalds/master while there aren't any
> substantive changes to the actual spec. (Basically, let's not rush
> naming this "2-rc" for 5.18 if there aren't any other changes: a 2-rc
> which is practically the same as 1 is probably going to be more
> confusing than helpful if it sticks around for a whole kernel release.

Sounds good.  In my reply (a few minutes ago) to your other email, I offer
to host a branch.  The branch approach sounds good to me.

> 
> (Also, when would we want to update the various mentions of "KTAP
> version 1" in the document to "KTAP version 2" or "KTAP version 2-rc"?
> Now, when 2 is released, at the first breaking change to that example,
> etc?)

There are only a few references to version 1.  I can create a patch to change
them to version 2 (other than the version of the document itself).

If we are working on a branch, it should not make a big difference when the
internal uses of "version 1" are changed to "version 2".  If I do it right
away then it won't get overlooked.

-Frank

> 
> Cheers,
> -- David
> 
>>  Documentation/dev-tools/ktap.rst | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/ktap.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/ktap.rst
>> index 5ee735c6687f..37b5dc61bfb8 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/ktap.rst
>> +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/ktap.rst
>> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
>>  .. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>>
>>  ===================================================
>> -The Kernel Test Anything Protocol (KTAP), version 1
>> +The Kernel Test Anything Protocol (KTAP), version 2-rc
>>  ===================================================
> 
> Nit: Sphinx complains that we now need more '=' signs:
> 
> Documentation/dev-tools/ktap.rst:3: WARNING: Title overline too short.
> ===================================================
> 
> 
> The Kernel Test Anything Protocol (KTAP), version 2-rc
> ===================================================
> 
>>
>>  TAP, or the Test Anything Protocol is a format for specifying test results used
>> --
>> Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com>
>>


  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-22 23:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-16 20:26 [RFC PATCH 0/2] Documentation: dev-tools: begin KTAP spec v2 process frowand.list
2022-03-16 20:26 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] Documentation: dev-tools: KTAP spec change version to 2-rc frowand.list
2022-03-17  8:43   ` David Gow
2022-04-22 23:25     ` Frank Rowand [this message]
2022-03-16 20:26 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] Documentation: dev-tools: use literal block instead of code-block frowand.list
2022-03-17  8:43   ` David Gow
2022-04-22 23:10     ` Frank Rowand
2022-04-28 18:35       ` Jonathan Corbet
2022-03-17  8:42 ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] Documentation: dev-tools: begin KTAP spec v2 process David Gow
2022-04-22 23:16   ` Frank Rowand
2022-04-23  7:53     ` David Gow

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ee73ec15-db6c-e0bb-ddb1-012499d08b11@gmail.com \
    --to=frowand.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=Tim.Bird@sony.com \
    --cc=brendanhiggins@google.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=davidgow@google.com \
    --cc=dlatypov@google.com \
    --cc=guillaume.tucker@collabora.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kernelci@groups.io \
    --cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rmr167@gmail.com \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).