From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 618EB43156; Sat, 22 Jun 2024 15:15:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1719069359; cv=none; b=C8APLuhQXE1EXOZWy+pYw4GhrnmUP7w7CIg7bfYJl9wookZUHTq9tCNhuGJTtOMdElObCmw9qa0wY2vMvKvUcLh0IEd540RlBG0iSdhjjgIehI3VomvH7cAd+HN31c0Bp6a9NTFLUBdC99iO8swdh1L9HLCuobaA2oSNq6q/xNk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1719069359; c=relaxed/simple; bh=fKO6cKhLDetMCWuOqjJT5MrxvFKMPuKR9jg4oHo9kQQ=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=KQ5H2WkZY98+Ihj/+7Va1SORsMAs8f4IXU7iIbG9i0jqAgUOYZnr+NPJaYD37/L5na0vbnnJSIK8zPzVehX1S304/Tlvc67PCv9T6FNDQFRh3qYRl64/U+yO1kcJfO2WENUJnNnMS0J+RbED98Do0GAmBxN7weX0emjzdh55Ngg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b=pGW0Kp8Q; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="pGW0Kp8Q" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=u/8MZvNVjE3HGccbfJVlLB0/ThMviFL2sbZ039sccRc=; b=pGW0Kp8QKF70FDXhq6o6d/UdIZ ny3FJn78zlj0lviZOCPglkjj+nDeWzsJbnpLIKgweD4ecV0khNo2oSc3KuSw/Pqo8OShSIbIGZYcd n1pZ5MCIHm9dDzP2uqg0kegjBG68PKQkPlhZnZoDYtkQSLIzd88nVYhXcZHdhctnZ0OvKjFUkj2oI DWy5HdHcwcAQeQgxg0/eMQgJWnAz+Do9Z+ptN4iP6QIKjjMdONEMyguCMFL2+RNPZi1JogNBdyNW4 J6JnW3LbIaO/UvMRTWawu+H1iusbi9Fsq4BLxeKLT1E0DbqnTNqAGazJKUlmmcOBT+WwNc/LgWfS0 SZ4LN4Cg==; Received: from [50.53.4.147] (helo=[192.168.254.15]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sL2Sz-0000000CJTH-3kI8; Sat, 22 Jun 2024 15:15:49 +0000 Message-ID: Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2024 08:15:48 -0700 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] Documentation: best practices for using Link trailers To: Kees Cook , Michael Ellerman , Konstantin Ryabitsev , Jonathan Corbet , Carlos Bilbao , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni Cc: workflows@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, ksummit@lists.linux.dev References: <20240619-docs-patch-msgid-link-v2-0-72dd272bfe37@linuxfoundation.org> <20240619-docs-patch-msgid-link-v2-2-72dd272bfe37@linuxfoundation.org> <87v821d2kp.fsf@mail.lhotse> <0BD32B85-22CF-45DF-A70E-FFE8E24469A4@kernel.org> Content-Language: en-US From: Randy Dunlap In-Reply-To: <0BD32B85-22CF-45DF-A70E-FFE8E24469A4@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 6/22/24 7:40 AM, Kees Cook wrote: >> I see some existing usage of the above style, but equally there's lots >> of examples of footnote-style links without the Link: tag, eg: > I moved from that to using Link: because checkpatch would complain about my long (URL) lines unless it had a Link tag :P We know that checkpatch isn't perfect. It's safe to ignore such complaints. -- ~Randy