From: "Moger, Babu" <bmoger@amd.com>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>,
tony.luck@intel.com, bp@alien8.de, ben.horgan@arm.com
Cc: corbet@lwn.net, skhan@linuxfoundation.org, rdunlap@infradead.org,
x86@kernel.org, Dave.Martin@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com,
tglx@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
hpa@zytor.com, fenghuay@nvidia.com, kas@kernel.org,
rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
rppt@kernel.org, dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com, elver@google.com,
enelsonmoore@gmail.com, jlayton@kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org,
ebiggers@kernel.org, seanjc@google.com, ewanhai-oc@zhaoxin.com,
binbin.wu@linux.intel.com, peterz@infradead.org,
ashish.kalra@amd.com, superm1@kernel.org,
chang.seok.bae@intel.com, prathyushi.nangia@amd.com,
kim.phillips@amd.com, ackerleytng@google.com,
elena.reshetova@intel.com, naveen@kernel.org,
darwi@linutronix.de, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-coco@lists.linux.dev,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, eranian@google.com, peternewman@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 09/18] fs/resctrl: Add interface to display kernel mode status
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2026 14:10:16 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f0bb62e7-3044-4248-9f4d-c6a8f23de7b9@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7d4770b8-779a-4c7a-b5cd-cd3739172a92@intel.com>
Hi Reinette,
On 10/15/2026 10:16 AM, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> Hi Babu,
>
> On 10/1/26 8:10 AM, Babu Moger wrote:
>> Resctrl kernel modes control how allocation and monitoring associations
>
> "allocation and monitoring associations" - unclear what this refers to at this point.
>
Hmm.. Not sure what other alternative.
>> are applied in kernel mode relative to user mode.
>>
>> Add info/kernel_mode to expose the supported and active kernel modes via
>> the resctrl filesystem. Supported modes are listed one per line, with the
>
> (needs imperative)
>
Sure.
>> active mode enclosed in square brackets.
>>
>> Document the interface in Documentation/filesystems/resctrl.rst.
>
> Above sentence is not necessary, it is obvious from the patch.
Sure.
A resctrl kernel mode enables kernel work to use different allocation
and monitoring associations than the originating user task.
Add info/kernel_mode to expose the supported and active kernel modes
through the resctrl filesystem. List supported modes one per line, with
the active mode enclosed in square brackets.
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>
>> ---
>
> ...
>
>> ---
>> Documentation/filesystems/resctrl.rst | 48 +++++++++++++
>> fs/resctrl/rdtgroup.c | 100 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 148 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/resctrl.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/resctrl.rst
>> index 73bf89d0ac83..73ccbb9594f5 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/filesystems/resctrl.rst
>> +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/resctrl.rst
>> @@ -527,6 +527,54 @@ conveyed in the error returns from file operations. E.g.
>> # cat info/last_cmd_status
>> mask f7 has non-consecutive 1-bits
>>
>> +"kernel_mode":
>> + In the top level of the "info" directory, "kernel_mode" lists the
>
> Note that just above this addition the documentation reads: "Finally, in the
> top level of the "info" directory there is a file named "last_cmd_status"."
> This addition thus creates a contradiction by adding another file after the
> "Finally". Could you please rework that portion of the documentation to
> have an introduction for the files in the top level info directory and make
> it clear how there are two files in this directory, similar to how the other
> directories are documented?
Sure. Will do. Probably separate patch to change "last_cmd_status".
>
>> + kernel modes supported by the system, one per line, with the active
>> + mode enclosed in square brackets. A kernel mode determines the
>> + allocation and monitoring associations when a task switches from
>
> Would user space know what "allocation and monitoring associations" means?
>
Will add a line about association means.
>> + user mode to kernel mode.
>> +
>> + Possible kernel modes are:
>> +
>> + "inherit_user":
>> + Kernel mode work uses the allocation and monitoring associations
>> + of the user-space task on whose behalf it runs.
>> +
>> + "global_enable_per_cpu":
>> + Kernel mode work uses the allocation and/or monitoring
>> + association of a backing CTRL_MON or MON group. The mode can
>> + be activated or deactivated per CPU. The line contains group=
>
> Having a global "activate"/"deactivate" as well as a per CPU "activate"/"deactivate"
> is confusing. The series switches between language here but I find other places
> that refer to the global "activate"/"deactivate" and then per CPU "enable"/"disable"
> to be easier to follow. Doing so will match the text of the "kmode_cpus" file that
> reads "The association is enabled on CPUs added to the mask and disabled on CPUs
> removed".
Sure.
>
>> + and whichever of ctrl= and mon= the platform supports::
>> +
>> + global_enable_per_cpu:ctrl=<assign|inherit>;mon=<assign|inherit>;group=<CTRL_MON>/<MON>/
>> +
>> + "ctrl":
>> + "assign" if kernel mode work uses the allocation
>> + association of the resource group named by "group",
>> + "inherit" if it uses the allocation association of
>> + the user-space task. Present only on systems that
>> + support allocation.
>
> ok - this is already late in the series but this seems to make it clear that
> "allocation association" means the portions of resources allocated to this group.
> Thus the earlier " enum kmode_state - Control or monitoring association" is wrong?
I think, it should be " enum kmode_state - Allocation or monitoring
association"
>
>> + "mon":
>> + "assign" if kernel mode work uses the monitoring
>> + association of the resource group named by "group",
>> + "inherit" if it uses the monitoring association of
>> + the user-space task. Present only on systems that
>> + support monitoring.
>> + "group":
>> + Path of the resource group, relative to the resctrl
>> + mount point. A CTRL_MON group is shown as <CTRL_MON>//,
>
> Shouldn't it just be <CTRL_MON>/ ?
Or We can say "<CTRL_MON>/<MON>/" to be generic for both cases.
"The group is shown as "<CTRL_MON>/<MON>/".
>
>> + a MON group as <CTRL_MON>/<MON>/.
>> +
>> + When the mode is not active, the parameters are the defaults
>> + used if it is activated without new values.
>
> "parameters are the defaults" seems to conflate two things: (a) the
> supported parameters, and (2) the default values of those supported
> parameters.
>
When the mode is not active, the output shows the supported parameters
and their default values, which are used if the mode is activated
without new values.
>> +
>> + Example of a system that supports allocation and monitoring, with
>> + default mode inherit_user::
>> +
>> + # cat info/kernel_mode
>> + [inherit_user]
>> + global_enable_per_cpu:ctrl=assign;mon=assign;group=//
>> +
>> Resource alloc and monitor groups
>> =================================
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/resctrl/rdtgroup.c b/fs/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
>> index 75b81d07a247..e82709d64a00 100644
>> --- a/fs/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
>> +++ b/fs/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
>> @@ -993,6 +993,99 @@ static int rdt_last_cmd_status_show(struct kernfs_open_file *of,
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> +/* Names used in info/kernel_mode; indexed by enum resctrl_kernel_mode */
>> +static const char * const resctrl_kmode_str[] = {
>> + [RESCTRL_INHERIT_USER] = "inherit_user",
>> + [RESCTRL_GLOBAL_ENABLE_PER_CPU] = "global_enable_per_cpu"
>> +};
>> +
>> +static_assert(ARRAY_SIZE(resctrl_kmode_str) == RESCTRL_NUM_KERNEL_MODES);
>> +
>> +static const char *resctrl_kmode_state_str(enum kmode_state state)
>> +{
>> + return state == KMODE_ASSIGN ? "assign" : "inherit";
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void resctrl_kmode_group_path(struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp,
>> + const char **ctrl, const char **mon)
>> +{
>> + *ctrl = "";
>> + *mon = "";
>> +
>> + if (rdtgrp->type == RDTMON_GROUP) {
>> + *ctrl = rdt_kn_name(rdtgrp->mon.parent->kn);
>> + *mon = rdt_kn_name(rdtgrp->kn);
>> + } else {
>> + *ctrl = rdt_kn_name(rdtgrp->kn);
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * resctrl_kernel_mode_show() - Display supported and active kernel modes
>> + * @of: kernfs open file
>> + * @seq: output seq_file
>> + * @v: unused
>> + *
>> + * Lists one line per mode and brackets the active mode. inherit_user
>> + * has no parameters. global_enable_per_cpu prints ctrl= only when
>> + * allocation is supported and mon= only when monitoring is supported,
>> + * then group=.
>> + *
>> + * Return: 0 on success, or -ENOENT on error.
>> + */
>> +static int resctrl_kernel_mode_show(struct kernfs_open_file *of,
>> + struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
>> +{
>> + const char *ctrl_grp, *mon_grp;
>> + enum resctrl_kernel_mode mode;
>> + bool active;
>> + char sep;
>> +
>> + if (!info_kn_lock(of->kn))
>> + return -ENOENT;
>> +
>> + for (mode = 0; mode < RESCTRL_NUM_KERNEL_MODES; mode++) {
>> + if (!test_bit(mode, resctrl_kmode.kmode_sup))
>> + continue;
>> +
>> + active = resctrl_kmode.kmode_cur == mode;
>> +
>> + seq_printf(seq, active ? "[%s" : "%s", resctrl_kmode_str[mode]);
>> +
>> + if (mode == RESCTRL_GLOBAL_ENABLE_PER_CPU) {
>> + ctrl_grp = "";
>> + mon_grp = "";
>> + if (active) {
>> + if (resctrl_kmode.rdtgrp)
>> + resctrl_kmode_group_path(resctrl_kmode.rdtgrp,
>> + &ctrl_grp, &mon_grp);
>> + else
>> + pr_warn("%s active without a resource group\n",
>> + resctrl_kmode_str[mode]);
>> + }
>> +
>> + sep = ':';
>> + if (resctrl_arch_alloc_capable()) {
>> + seq_printf(seq, "%cctrl=%s", sep,
>> + resctrl_kmode_state_str(resctrl_kmode.ctrl));
>> + sep = ';';
>> + }
>> + if (resctrl_arch_mon_capable()) {
>> + seq_printf(seq, "%cmon=%s", sep,
>> + resctrl_kmode_state_str(resctrl_kmode.mon));
>> + sep = ';';
>> + }
>> + seq_printf(seq, "%cgroup=%s/%s/", sep, ctrl_grp, mon_grp);
>
> Looks like this will print a monitoring group on a system that does not support
> monitoring? I understand that the monitoring group will be the empty string in this
> scenario but in resctrl that has meaning of "default monitoring group" so printing
> this when monitoring is not supported is unexpected.
>
Ok. If monitoring not supported it will be "CTRL_MON/" (Example
group=ctrl1/") and then default group is "/".
Is that what you are suggesting?
> I also do not expect the monitoring group to be displayed if "mon=inherit" since
> that presents a contradiction with stating that "monitoring group is inherited"
> while printing a monitoring group.
Yes. We should not display "mon=inherit" when monitoring in not
supported. Will check on this.
Thanks
Babu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-16 19:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-01 15:10 [PATCH v6 00/18] x86,fs/resctrl: Add kernel-mode (e.g., PLZA) support to the resctrl subsystem Babu Moger
2026-10-01 15:10 ` [PATCH v6 01/18] x86/cpufeatures: Support Privilege Level Zero Association (PLZA) Babu Moger
2026-10-15 14:16 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-10-15 23:02 ` Babu Moger
2026-10-01 15:10 ` [PATCH v6 02/18] x86/resctrl: Add PLZA support to command-line options Babu Moger
2026-10-15 14:17 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-10-15 23:03 ` Babu Moger
2026-10-01 15:10 ` [PATCH v6 03/18] x86/resctrl: Add PLZA configuration definitions and data structures Babu Moger
2026-10-15 14:22 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-10-15 23:07 ` Babu Moger
2026-10-01 15:10 ` [PATCH v6 04/18] fs/resctrl: Introduce kernel mode enum Babu Moger
2026-10-15 14:44 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-10-15 23:09 ` Babu Moger
2026-10-01 15:10 ` [PATCH v6 05/18] x86,arm,fs/resctrl: Introduce architecture hook to program global kernel mode Babu Moger
2026-10-15 14:30 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-10-15 23:12 ` Moger, Babu
2026-10-01 15:10 ` [PATCH v6 06/18] fs/resctrl: Introduce kernel mode states for resctrl Babu Moger
2026-10-15 14:37 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-10-16 15:10 ` Moger, Babu
2026-10-01 15:10 ` [PATCH v6 07/18] fs/resctrl: Introduce resctrl_set_kmode_support() to register supported modes Babu Moger
2026-10-15 14:40 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-10-16 15:27 ` Moger, Babu
2026-10-01 15:10 ` [PATCH v6 08/18] x86/resctrl: Register RESCTRL_GLOBAL_ENABLE_PER_CPU when PLZA is available Babu Moger
2026-10-15 14:46 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-10-16 15:50 ` Moger, Babu
2026-10-01 15:10 ` [PATCH v6 09/18] fs/resctrl: Add interface to display kernel mode status Babu Moger
2026-10-15 15:16 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-10-16 19:10 ` Moger, Babu [this message]
2026-10-01 15:10 ` [PATCH v6 10/18] fs/resctrl: Add support for hidden resource group files Babu Moger
2026-10-15 15:27 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-10-16 20:53 ` Moger, Babu
2026-10-01 15:10 ` [PATCH v6 11/18] fs/resctrl: Introduce kmode_cpus/kmode_cpus_list per rdtgroup Babu Moger
2026-10-15 15:31 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-10-16 21:33 ` Moger, Babu
2026-10-01 15:10 ` [PATCH v6 12/18] fs/resctrl: Add CPU hotplug support for kernel mode associations Babu Moger
2026-10-15 15:33 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-10-16 22:21 ` Moger, Babu
2026-10-01 15:10 ` [PATCH v6 13/18] fs/resctrl: Deactivate kernel mode associations when a group is removed Babu Moger
2026-10-15 15:43 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-10-01 15:10 ` [PATCH v6 14/18] fs/resctrl: Control visibility of global per-CPU kernel mode group files Babu Moger
2026-10-15 15:46 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-10-01 15:10 ` [PATCH v6 15/18] fs/resctrl: Reject mode changes for groups backing kernel mode Babu Moger
2026-10-15 15:49 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-10-01 15:10 ` [PATCH v6 16/18] fs/resctrl: Add interface to modify kernel mode via info/kernel_mode Babu Moger
2026-10-15 16:07 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-10-01 15:10 ` [PATCH v6 17/18] fs/resctrl: Allow user space to write kmode_cpus/kmode_cpus_list Babu Moger
2026-10-01 15:10 ` [PATCH v6 18/18] fs/resctrl: Add kernel mode documentation and examples Babu Moger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f0bb62e7-3044-4248-9f4d-c6a8f23de7b9@amd.com \
--to=bmoger@amd.com \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=ackerleytng@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ashish.kalra@amd.com \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=ben.horgan@arm.com \
--cc=binbin.wu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=darwi@linutronix.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=elena.reshetova@intel.com \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=enelsonmoore@gmail.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=ewanhai-oc@zhaoxin.com \
--cc=fenghuay@nvidia.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=kas@kernel.org \
--cc=kim.phillips@amd.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=naveen@kernel.org \
--cc=peternewman@google.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=prathyushi.nangia@amd.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=superm1@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox