From: Atish Patra <atish.patra@linux.dev>
To: "Clément Léger" <cleger@rivosinc.com>,
"Paul Walmsley" <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
"Palmer Dabbelt" <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
"Anup Patel" <anup@brainfault.org>,
"Atish Patra" <atishp@atishpatra.org>,
"Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>,
"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@sifive.com>,
Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>,
Deepak Gupta <debug@rivosinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 04/14] riscv: sbi: add FWFT extension interface
Date: Mon, 12 May 2025 11:00:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f27b0506-4841-4650-a0ee-0fe1643fdf37@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fe9d801b-007d-476d-97fe-96d0f3d218cd@rivosinc.com>
On 5/12/25 1:14 AM, Clément Léger wrote:
>
> On 09/05/2025 02:18, Atish Patra wrote:
>> On 4/24/25 10:31 AM, Clément Léger wrote:
>>> This SBI extensions enables supervisor mode to control feature that are
>>> under M-mode control (For instance, Svadu menvcfg ADUE bit, Ssdbltrp
>>> DTE, etc). Add an interface to set local features for a specific cpu
>>> mask as well as for the online cpu mask.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Clément Léger <cleger@rivosinc.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
>>> ---
>>> arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h | 17 +++++++++++
>>> arch/riscv/kernel/sbi.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 2 files changed, 74 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h
>>> index 7ec249fea880..3bbef56bcefc 100644
>>> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h
>>> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h
>>> @@ -503,6 +503,23 @@ int sbi_remote_hfence_vvma_asid(const struct
>>> cpumask *cpu_mask,
>>> unsigned long asid);
>>> long sbi_probe_extension(int ext);
>>> +int sbi_fwft_set(u32 feature, unsigned long value, unsigned long
>>> flags);
>>> +int sbi_fwft_set_cpumask(const cpumask_t *mask, u32 feature,
>>> + unsigned long value, unsigned long flags);
>>> +/**
>>> + * sbi_fwft_set_online_cpus() - Set a feature on all online cpus
>>> + * @feature: The feature to be set
>>> + * @value: The feature value to be set
>>> + * @flags: FWFT feature set flags
>>> + *
>>> + * Return: 0 on success, appropriate linux error code otherwise.
>>> + */
>>> +static inline int sbi_fwft_set_online_cpus(u32 feature, unsigned long
>>> value,
>>> + unsigned long flags)
>>> +{
>>> + return sbi_fwft_set_cpumask(cpu_online_mask, feature, value, flags);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> /* Check if current SBI specification version is 0.1 or not */
>>> static inline int sbi_spec_is_0_1(void)
>>> {
>>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/sbi.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/sbi.c
>>> index 1d44c35305a9..d57e4dae7dac 100644
>>> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/sbi.c
>>> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/sbi.c
>>> @@ -299,6 +299,63 @@ static int __sbi_rfence_v02(int fid, const struct
>>> cpumask *cpu_mask,
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>> +/**
>>> + * sbi_fwft_set() - Set a feature on the local hart
>>> + * @feature: The feature ID to be set
>>> + * @value: The feature value to be set
>>> + * @flags: FWFT feature set flags
>>> + *
>>> + * Return: 0 on success, appropriate linux error code otherwise.
>>> + */
>>> +int sbi_fwft_set(u32 feature, unsigned long value, unsigned long flags)
>>> +{
>>> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +struct fwft_set_req {
>>> + u32 feature;
>>> + unsigned long value;
>>> + unsigned long flags;
>>> + atomic_t error;
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static void cpu_sbi_fwft_set(void *arg)
>>> +{
>>> + struct fwft_set_req *req = arg;
>>> + int ret;
>>> +
>>> + ret = sbi_fwft_set(req->feature, req->value, req->flags);
>>> + if (ret)
>>> + atomic_set(&req->error, ret);
>> What happens when cpuX executed first reported an error but cpuY
>> executed this function later and report success.
>>
>> The error will be masked in that case.
> We actually only set the bit if an error happened (consider it as a
> sticky error bit). So if CPUy reports success, it won't clear the bit.
Ahh yes. I missed that.
> Thanks,
>
> Clément
>
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +/**
>>> + * sbi_fwft_set_cpumask() - Set a feature for the specified cpumask
>>> + * @mask: CPU mask of cpus that need the feature to be set
>>> + * @feature: The feature ID to be set
>>> + * @value: The feature value to be set
>>> + * @flags: FWFT feature set flags
>>> + *
>>> + * Return: 0 on success, appropriate linux error code otherwise.
>>> + */
>>> +int sbi_fwft_set_cpumask(const cpumask_t *mask, u32 feature,
>>> + unsigned long value, unsigned long flags)
>>> +{
>>> + struct fwft_set_req req = {
>>> + .feature = feature,
>>> + .value = value,
>>> + .flags = flags,
>>> + .error = ATOMIC_INIT(0),
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + if (feature & SBI_FWFT_GLOBAL_FEATURE_BIT)
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> +
>>> + on_each_cpu_mask(mask, cpu_sbi_fwft_set, &req, 1);
>>> +
>>> + return atomic_read(&req.error);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> /**
>>> * sbi_set_timer() - Program the timer for next timer event.
>>> * @stime_value: The value after which next timer event should fire.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-12 18:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-24 17:31 [PATCH v6 00/14] riscv: add SBI FWFT misaligned exception delegation support Clément Léger
2025-04-24 17:31 ` [PATCH v6 01/14] riscv: sbi: add Firmware Feature (FWFT) SBI extensions definitions Clément Léger
2025-05-08 20:17 ` Atish Patra
2025-04-24 17:31 ` [PATCH v6 02/14] riscv: sbi: remove useless parenthesis Clément Léger
2025-04-25 7:46 ` Andrew Jones
2025-05-08 20:18 ` Atish Patra
2025-04-24 17:31 ` [PATCH v6 03/14] riscv: sbi: add new SBI error mappings Clément Léger
2025-05-08 20:18 ` Atish Patra
2025-04-24 17:31 ` [PATCH v6 04/14] riscv: sbi: add FWFT extension interface Clément Léger
2025-05-08 22:52 ` Atish Patra
2025-05-09 0:18 ` Atish Patra
2025-05-12 8:14 ` Clément Léger
2025-05-12 18:00 ` Atish Patra [this message]
2025-04-24 17:31 ` [PATCH v6 05/14] riscv: sbi: add SBI FWFT extension calls Clément Léger
2025-05-08 23:01 ` Atish Patra
2025-04-24 17:31 ` [PATCH v6 06/14] riscv: misaligned: request misaligned exception from SBI Clément Léger
2025-04-24 17:31 ` [PATCH v6 07/14] riscv: misaligned: use on_each_cpu() for scalar misaligned access probing Clément Léger
2025-04-24 17:31 ` [PATCH v6 08/14] riscv: misaligned: use correct CONFIG_ ifdef for misaligned_access_speed Clément Léger
2025-04-24 17:31 ` [PATCH v6 09/14] riscv: misaligned: move emulated access uniformity check in a function Clément Léger
2025-04-24 17:31 ` [PATCH v6 10/14] riscv: misaligned: add a function to check misalign trap delegability Clément Léger
2025-04-24 18:18 ` ALOK TIWARI
2025-04-24 17:31 ` [PATCH v6 11/14] RISC-V: KVM: add SBI extension init()/deinit() functions Clément Léger
2025-05-08 17:27 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2025-05-09 3:20 ` Anup Patel
2025-05-09 0:26 ` Atish Patra
2025-04-24 17:31 ` [PATCH v6 12/14] RISC-V: KVM: add SBI extension reset callback Clément Léger
2025-05-09 0:28 ` Atish Patra
2025-04-24 17:32 ` [PATCH v6 13/14] RISC-V: KVM: add support for FWFT SBI extension Clément Léger
2025-05-09 18:49 ` Atish Patra
2025-04-24 17:32 ` [PATCH v6 14/14] RISC-V: KVM: add support for SBI_FWFT_MISALIGNED_DELEG Clément Léger
2025-05-09 18:09 ` Atish Patra
2025-05-12 8:28 ` Clément Léger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f27b0506-4841-4650-a0ee-0fe1643fdf37@linux.dev \
--to=atish.patra@linux.dev \
--cc=ajones@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=atishp@atishpatra.org \
--cc=cleger@rivosinc.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=debug@rivosinc.com \
--cc=kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=samuel.holland@sifive.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).