From: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>
To: Petr Oros <poros@redhat.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>,
Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>,
Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@kernel.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 12/14] selftests: dpll: add pin phase adjust test
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2026 11:51:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f3329ded-852c-489e-b585-db75a767f20f@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261105151852.1844305-13-poros@redhat.com>
On 11/5/26 16:18, Petr Oros wrote:
> Add a test that reads the phase adjustment range and granularity a
> pin advertises, picks the largest multiple of the granularity inside
> the range, or the smallest one when that is already the current value,
> sets it, reads it back and restores the original value. It skips when
> the dpll tool lacks the phase-adjust keyword of pin set and when the
> range is too narrow to pick a different value. A pin that reports no
> phase adjustment or no range is a skip on a device provided by the user
> and a failure on the device the script created, whose pins report
> both.
>
> The core refuses a value that is not a multiple of the granularity a
> driver reports, the current value included, so a pin that sits at such
> a value could not be put back. The test bails out on that before it
> schedules the restore, which is deferred right after so that an
> interrupted run restores the value too.
>
> The granularity is only reported by drivers that have the core enforce
> one. Without it the target is computed with a granularity of 1, and a
> driver may refuse it for a granularity of its own or for any other
> constraint the interface does not advertise. A refused set is therefore
> a skip on a device provided by the user, with the reason the tool
> reported, and a failure on the device the script created, whose
> simulator accepts every value its range and granularity allow. The
> test ends there, a value that was not set has nothing to read back.
>
> Signed-off-by: Petr Oros <poros@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-06 10:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-05 15:18 [PATCH net-next v2 00/14] dpll: add a simulated DPLL device driver Petr Oros
2026-11-05 15:18 ` [PATCH net-next v2 01/14] dpll: dpllsim: Add " Petr Oros
2026-11-06 10:47 ` Ivan Vecera
2026-11-05 15:18 ` [PATCH net-next v2 02/14] selftests: dpll: add test library and device lifecycle tests Petr Oros
2026-11-06 10:48 ` Ivan Vecera
2026-11-05 15:18 ` [PATCH net-next v2 03/14] dpll: dpllsim: Add configurable pins Petr Oros
2026-11-06 10:48 ` Ivan Vecera
2026-11-05 15:18 ` [PATCH net-next v2 04/14] selftests: dpll: add pin enumeration and property tests Petr Oros
2026-11-06 10:48 ` Ivan Vecera
2026-11-05 15:18 ` [PATCH net-next v2 05/14] dpll: dpllsim: Add support to set input pin state Petr Oros
2026-11-06 10:41 ` Ivan Vecera
2026-11-05 15:18 ` [PATCH net-next v2 06/14] selftests: dpll: add pin state tests Petr Oros
2026-11-06 10:49 ` Ivan Vecera
2026-11-05 15:18 ` [PATCH net-next v2 07/14] dpll: dpllsim: Add support to get/set priority on input pins Petr Oros
2026-11-06 10:49 ` Ivan Vecera
2026-11-05 15:18 ` [PATCH net-next v2 08/14] selftests: dpll: add pin priority test Petr Oros
2026-11-06 10:50 ` Ivan Vecera
2026-11-05 15:18 ` [PATCH net-next v2 09/14] dpll: dpllsim: Add support to set frequency on pins Petr Oros
2026-11-06 10:50 ` Ivan Vecera
2026-11-05 15:18 ` [PATCH net-next v2 10/14] selftests: dpll: add pin frequency test Petr Oros
2026-11-06 10:51 ` Ivan Vecera
2026-11-05 15:18 ` [PATCH net-next v2 11/14] dpll: dpllsim: Add support to adjust phase Petr Oros
2026-11-06 10:51 ` Ivan Vecera
2026-11-05 15:18 ` [PATCH net-next v2 12/14] selftests: dpll: add pin phase adjust test Petr Oros
2026-11-06 10:51 ` Ivan Vecera [this message]
2026-11-05 15:18 ` [PATCH net-next v2 13/14] selftests: dpll: add concurrency stress tests Petr Oros
2026-11-06 10:52 ` Ivan Vecera
2026-11-05 15:18 ` [PATCH net-next v2 14/14] selftests: dpll: add reference leak tests Petr Oros
2026-11-06 10:47 ` Ivan Vecera
2026-11-06 12:27 ` [PATCH net-next v2 00/14] dpll: add a simulated DPLL device driver Jiri Pirko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f3329ded-852c-489e-b585-db75a767f20f@redhat.com \
--to=ivecera@redhat.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=poros@redhat.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).