From: "Clément Léger" <cleger@rivosinc.com>
To: Deepak Gupta <debug@rivosinc.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
alistair.francis@wdc.com, richard.henderson@linaro.org,
jim.shu@sifive.com, andybnac@gmail.com, kito.cheng@sifive.com,
charlie@rivosinc.com, atishp@rivosinc.com, evan@rivosinc.com,
alexghiti@rivosinc.com, samitolvanen@google.com,
broonie@kernel.org, rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 14/26] riscv/traps: Introduce software check exception
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2025 14:49:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fec3b7be-4259-4eef-87f9-b2cee5718cae@rivosinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250204-v5_user_cfi_series-v9-14-b37a49c5205c@rivosinc.com>
On 05/02/2025 02:22, Deepak Gupta wrote:
> zicfiss / zicfilp introduces a new exception to priv isa `software check
> exception` with cause code = 18. This patch implements software check
> exception.
Hey Deepak,
While not directly related to this patch, is the exception 18 delegation
documented in the SBI doc ? I mean, should we specify that it is always
delegated when implementing FWFT LANDING_PAD/SHADOW_STACK ?
Thanks,
Clément
>
> Additionally it implements a cfi violation handler which checks for code
> in xtval. If xtval=2, it means that sw check exception happened because of
> an indirect branch not landing on 4 byte aligned PC or not landing on
> `lpad` instruction or label value embedded in `lpad` not matching label
> value setup in `x7`. If xtval=3, it means that sw check exception happened
> because of mismatch between link register (x1 or x5) and top of shadow
> stack (on execution of `sspopchk`).
>
> In case of cfi violation, SIGSEGV is raised with code=SEGV_CPERR.
> SEGV_CPERR was introduced by x86 shadow stack patches.
>
> Signed-off-by: Deepak Gupta <debug@rivosinc.com>
> ---
> arch/riscv/include/asm/asm-prototypes.h | 1 +
> arch/riscv/include/asm/entry-common.h | 2 ++
> arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S | 3 +++
> arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 49 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/asm-prototypes.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/asm-prototypes.h
> index cd627ec289f1..5a27cefd7805 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/asm-prototypes.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/asm-prototypes.h
> @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ DECLARE_DO_ERROR_INFO(do_trap_ecall_u);
> DECLARE_DO_ERROR_INFO(do_trap_ecall_s);
> DECLARE_DO_ERROR_INFO(do_trap_ecall_m);
> DECLARE_DO_ERROR_INFO(do_trap_break);
> +DECLARE_DO_ERROR_INFO(do_trap_software_check);
>
> asmlinkage void handle_bad_stack(struct pt_regs *regs);
> asmlinkage void do_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs);
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/entry-common.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/entry-common.h
> index b28ccc6cdeea..34ed149af5d1 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/entry-common.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/entry-common.h
> @@ -40,4 +40,6 @@ static inline int handle_misaligned_store(struct pt_regs *regs)
> }
> #endif
>
> +bool handle_user_cfi_violation(struct pt_regs *regs);
> +
> #endif /* _ASM_RISCV_ENTRY_COMMON_H */
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S b/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S
> index 00494b54ff4a..9c00cac3f6f2 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S
> @@ -472,6 +472,9 @@ SYM_DATA_START_LOCAL(excp_vect_table)
> RISCV_PTR do_page_fault /* load page fault */
> RISCV_PTR do_trap_unknown
> RISCV_PTR do_page_fault /* store page fault */
> + RISCV_PTR do_trap_unknown /* cause=16 */
> + RISCV_PTR do_trap_unknown /* cause=17 */
> + RISCV_PTR do_trap_software_check /* cause=18 is sw check exception */
> SYM_DATA_END_LABEL(excp_vect_table, SYM_L_LOCAL, excp_vect_table_end)
>
> #ifndef CONFIG_MMU
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c
> index 8ff8e8b36524..3f7709f4595a 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c
> @@ -354,6 +354,49 @@ void do_trap_ecall_u(struct pt_regs *regs)
>
> }
>
> +#define CFI_TVAL_FCFI_CODE 2
> +#define CFI_TVAL_BCFI_CODE 3
> +/* handle cfi violations */
> +bool handle_user_cfi_violation(struct pt_regs *regs)
> +{
> + bool ret = false;
> + unsigned long tval = csr_read(CSR_TVAL);
> +
> + if ((tval == CFI_TVAL_FCFI_CODE && cpu_supports_indirect_br_lp_instr()) ||
> + (tval == CFI_TVAL_BCFI_CODE && cpu_supports_shadow_stack())) {
> + do_trap_error(regs, SIGSEGV, SEGV_CPERR, regs->epc,
> + "Oops - control flow violation");
> + ret = true;
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * software check exception is defined with risc-v cfi spec. Software check
> + * exception is raised when:-
> + * a) An indirect branch doesn't land on 4 byte aligned PC or `lpad`
> + * instruction or `label` value programmed in `lpad` instr doesn't
> + * match with value setup in `x7`. reported code in `xtval` is 2.
> + * b) `sspopchk` instruction finds a mismatch between top of shadow stack (ssp)
> + * and x1/x5. reported code in `xtval` is 3.
> + */
> +asmlinkage __visible __trap_section void do_trap_software_check(struct pt_regs *regs)
> +{
> + if (user_mode(regs)) {
> + irqentry_enter_from_user_mode(regs);
> +
> + /* not a cfi violation, then merge into flow of unknown trap handler */
> + if (!handle_user_cfi_violation(regs))
> + do_trap_unknown(regs);
> +
> + irqentry_exit_to_user_mode(regs);
> + } else {
> + /* sw check exception coming from kernel is a bug in kernel */
> + die(regs, "Kernel BUG");
> + }
> +}
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_MMU
> asmlinkage __visible noinstr void do_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-06 13:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-05 1:21 [PATCH v9 00/26] riscv control-flow integrity for usermode Deepak Gupta
2025-02-05 1:21 ` [PATCH v9 01/26] mm: helper `is_shadow_stack_vma` to check shadow stack vma Deepak Gupta
2025-02-07 9:27 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-02-07 20:06 ` Mark Brown
2025-02-07 22:44 ` Deepak Gupta
2025-02-07 22:44 ` Deepak Gupta
2025-02-07 23:44 ` Deepak Gupta
2025-02-07 23:52 ` Deepak Gupta
2025-02-05 1:21 ` [PATCH v9 02/26] dt-bindings: riscv: zicfilp and zicfiss in dt-bindings (extensions.yaml) Deepak Gupta
2025-02-05 1:21 ` [PATCH v9 03/26] riscv: zicfiss / zicfilp enumeration Deepak Gupta
2025-02-06 13:50 ` Clément Léger
2025-02-07 23:25 ` Deepak Gupta
2025-02-05 1:21 ` [PATCH v9 04/26] riscv: zicfiss / zicfilp extension csr and bit definitions Deepak Gupta
2025-02-05 1:21 ` [PATCH v9 05/26] riscv: usercfi state for task and save/restore of CSR_SSP on trap entry/exit Deepak Gupta
2025-02-05 1:21 ` [PATCH v9 06/26] riscv/mm : ensure PROT_WRITE leads to VM_READ | VM_WRITE Deepak Gupta
2025-02-05 1:21 ` [PATCH v9 07/26] riscv mm: manufacture shadow stack pte Deepak Gupta
2025-02-05 1:21 ` [PATCH v9 08/26] riscv mmu: teach pte_mkwrite to manufacture shadow stack PTEs Deepak Gupta
2025-02-05 1:21 ` [PATCH v9 09/26] riscv mmu: write protect and shadow stack Deepak Gupta
2025-02-05 1:21 ` [PATCH v9 10/26] riscv/mm: Implement map_shadow_stack() syscall Deepak Gupta
2025-02-05 1:21 ` [PATCH v9 11/26] riscv/shstk: If needed allocate a new shadow stack on clone Deepak Gupta
2025-02-05 1:21 ` [PATCH v9 12/26] riscv: Implements arch agnostic shadow stack prctls Deepak Gupta
2025-02-05 1:22 ` [PATCH v9 13/26] prctl: arch-agnostic prctl for indirect branch tracking Deepak Gupta
2025-02-05 1:22 ` [PATCH v9 14/26] riscv/traps: Introduce software check exception Deepak Gupta
2025-02-06 13:49 ` Clément Léger [this message]
2025-02-07 21:26 ` Deepak Gupta
2025-02-10 7:42 ` Clément Léger
2025-02-05 1:22 ` [PATCH v9 15/26] riscv: signal: abstract header saving for setup_sigcontext Deepak Gupta
2025-02-05 1:22 ` [PATCH v9 16/26] riscv/signal: save and restore of shadow stack for signal Deepak Gupta
2025-02-05 1:22 ` [PATCH v9 17/26] riscv/kernel: update __show_regs to print shadow stack register Deepak Gupta
2025-02-05 1:22 ` [PATCH v9 18/26] riscv/ptrace: riscv cfi status and state via ptrace and in core files Deepak Gupta
2025-02-05 1:22 ` [PATCH v9 19/26] riscv/hwprobe: zicfilp / zicfiss enumeration in hwprobe Deepak Gupta
2025-02-05 1:22 ` [PATCH v9 20/26] riscv: Add Firmware Feature SBI extensions definitions Deepak Gupta
2025-02-05 1:22 ` [PATCH v9 21/26] riscv: enable kernel access to shadow stack memory via FWFT sbi call Deepak Gupta
2025-02-05 1:22 ` [PATCH v9 22/26] riscv: kernel command line option to opt out of user cfi Deepak Gupta
2025-02-05 1:22 ` [PATCH v9 23/26] riscv: create a config for shadow stack and landing pad instr support Deepak Gupta
2025-02-05 1:22 ` [PATCH v9 24/26] riscv: Documentation for landing pad / indirect branch tracking Deepak Gupta
2025-02-05 1:22 ` [PATCH v9 25/26] riscv: Documentation for shadow stack on riscv Deepak Gupta
2025-02-05 1:22 ` [PATCH v9 26/26] kselftest/riscv: kselftest for user mode cfi Deepak Gupta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fec3b7be-4259-4eef-87f9-b2cee5718cae@rivosinc.com \
--to=cleger@rivosinc.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexghiti@rivosinc.com \
--cc=alistair.francis@wdc.com \
--cc=andybnac@gmail.com \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=atishp@rivosinc.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=charlie@rivosinc.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=conor@kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=debug@rivosinc.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=evan@rivosinc.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=jim.shu@sifive.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=kito.cheng@sifive.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).