From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out162-62-57-252.mail.qq.com (out162-62-57-252.mail.qq.com [162.62.57.252]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED27047F41; Sat, 18 May 2024 15:58:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=162.62.57.252 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716047887; cv=none; b=t7CppZQo/ajI/zcRb4BfYkw5SCGuKNrPacrjxAvgjZg/IBkTSpE3JKGE3czqYtgL50FeCfN+04id29dQ32FdjrC+y25/beuJLuGbou0DzKvGIoOZhrR70bo1gDOHA9SY3ht02hZiOrsP/XIqgGb0fs1mNHrOK0GQCdJabFqMRts= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716047887; c=relaxed/simple; bh=T0B0o4Ahrip8acK9zV6qCGZ5vdii8VsZwX5YTddlLXo=; h=Message-ID:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:MIME-Version; b=rLzzzSUktcYVqdHz0kXYRkR0TvD6Xb+3rIcIKDgvBDpPyIcJf9xqL3tkkio+BAZzP6WuEuCrA1JhdSXpMCzEZ52IgrQlrFf634khceJe/li+nl+PG03JDjwN0uE5dtQ4boqmMxM10H7JbD8aSkrz/dgUuYnBRixSl6sVOgWiH/U= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=cyyself.name; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=cyyself.name; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=qq.com header.i=@qq.com header.b=GGT+svEr; arc=none smtp.client-ip=162.62.57.252 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=cyyself.name Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=cyyself.name Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=qq.com header.i=@qq.com header.b="GGT+svEr" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=qq.com; s=s201512; t=1716047871; bh=tAscGdrOoDFuMMheeDr7p+FqOHBXTQvTsOI3LnIgptI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date; b=GGT+svErobVJZ9z26eiVNtR4Y6gTBka8K7cVS2rCPErFlJYbZlMOa8GHsg7yKegNg ZDvD4Fn5gezQ3yO28YgTuh4ajfGEHSnoJHB6YRpqiiliuP2Z+JUL6OooL7Cb7a42Hg JTAdWqvKSkC8HRNtBscCH/aXYVKueWczq5bBSbII= Received: from cyy-pc.lan ([240e:379:227e:fc00:28c6:7f50:fe33:13fe]) by newxmesmtplogicsvrsza15-1.qq.com (NewEsmtp) with SMTP id E6F39492; Sat, 18 May 2024 23:57:47 +0800 X-QQ-mid: xmsmtpt1716047867td774prpc Message-ID: X-QQ-XMAILINFO: N1L4R2fPZA3sGxWRvyML2lSmPDupt8TqlCjRvFnm+hC6uaH9gXe0Pm3XD0PSL/ 0erheW3tBktAEYY1aGCsZMQ+9Km7EjyMrugsV/1l1P6crb/C1CZff/eKpC/3Wa6GfdIumsU6HVkt 3NZKdmpULhbB7Z1uhNU/adSopXtbLEEk6HRJ8igxn/oNXPX1mOPoWR2PHaU3b5YazgVMHIYDHNjN MPefZ91iplsmyKG5OKvi97a5lTfhCRCoLnj9VNxIKlrkLs1lPwJM+gxxJ9Vmj4PhxeNohlDZrfd6 XCohexsFERKvzDLN695swbTQX1chHh3r5099is1qYNaI1qn12kd5Icf/G/nZyfICbcxZzES6WRWX 8RJEo42Fkvyj+nN3Q4ZW5FzyDOlvigGNF7OZYI7v4PvRv1Y18NaqHe3aZ/hmXnF3egReKW+WN/dp cH8LEDAqI/KaCJ9AtAAifV6YOdv8lEtBPJpwq7dIGSEiEP0oWbyCptsU8f1Yk/4lIK+x9K765QyC QP4mnkX1pDMR/xyDrjtYvDeq6vbcYNLXAiKVLkelPWgsrh0VEyBTUzC7+TPqcfc9i9HCnGzNRZtL +uIdBB69Shyd9rIG6DWrWKrnu9tFQzvREOEbRxM8xR2622D/lz4+546WyvXa6BuPv/8Umnkp3p4h 8M2F+ssKMuyOFlwgIeCGKAt7RGqUXVOiNngpMDt0EYGO/HruiBz5fSdUO5KjUScmBUK3+ogvESHb HV3pjo7TwfB+Ov2oNhb8G24QKviYvmn16xcaAJ41J2sA2gd1Qbg830M9VgdtcUtsJyxJRIU/Rbkb RtIm8wNJtyEL39MubshwbQKPx7kkfqmcnBoiDE7miufs0yTDawZlCrV+1XNplP+ioUY2wOK9JU6y +kbMc1oN/820cub/UlbrJvLl398C+L34JYi+yxh9d4RGRVLpdOyQ8uVzWom35seoxo4onN1gxdUF clsrI+752+eW1IvssCTQkEl1vZiv4qqtGPyqXXJx7+xDjBxcRJcedvF6vfDp4PuIb5Ta34AYOa6f n7aD+rKA== X-QQ-XMRINFO: Nq+8W0+stu50PRdwbJxPCL0= From: Yangyu Chen To: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org Cc: Elliott Hughes , Charlie Jenkins , Jonathan Corbet , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Evan Green , =?UTF-8?q?Cl=C3=A9ment=20L=C3=A9ger?= , Conor Dooley , Andrew Jones , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Yangyu Chen Subject: [PATCH 0/2] docs: riscv: Some clarifies on hwprobe misaligned performance Date: Sat, 18 May 2024 23:57:45 +0800 X-OQ-MSGID: <20240518155745.891372-1-cyy@cyyself.name> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.0 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit This patchset clarifies some unclear things about hwprobe's misaligned performance. Including: - hwprobe misaligned performance is only applied to scalar from patch [1] - The defined keys of RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_* are values not bitmasks I cherry-picked [1] rather than write dependency because the original patch was submitted with a line wrapped to 80 characters. We can't directly apply that patch using `git am.` [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/CAJgzZorn5anPH8dVPqvjVWmLKqTi5bkLDR=FH-ZAcdXFnNe8Eg@mail.gmail.com/ Yangyu Chen (1): docs: riscv: hwprobe: Clarify misaligned keys are values not bitmasks enh (1): docs: riscv: Clarify risc-v hwprobe RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_* docs. Documentation/arch/riscv/hwprobe.rst | 31 ++++++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) -- 2.43.0