From: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hpe.com>
To: "mchehab@s-opensource.com" <mchehab@s-opensource.com>,
"bp@alien8.de" <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"mchehab@kernel.org" <mchehab@kernel.org>,
"rjw@rjwysocki.net" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
"srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com"
<srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
"tony.luck@intel.com" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
"lenb@kernel.org" <lenb@kernel.org>,
"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-edac@vger.kernel.org" <linux-edac@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [3/3] ghes_edac: add platform check to enable ghes_edac
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 18:38:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1500661773.2042.53.camel@hpe.com> (raw)
On Fri, 2017-07-21 at 19:23 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
:
> Not only that: thresholds depend on the DIMM types which means,
BIOS
> must know what DIMM types are in there which I doubt.
BIOS knows DIMM model from the SPD data.
> So exposing that to configuration instead of "deciding" for people
> would be better.
Enterprise platforms have very different model (I do not say it's
better for everyone from the cost perspective). Typically, such
platform vendors work with DIMM vendors directly to come with their
supported DIMMs with own part numbers, which are certified for the
platforms with extensive validation testings.
Thanks,
-Toshi
next reply other threads:[~2017-07-21 18:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-21 18:38 Toshi Kani [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-07-25 23:00 [3/3] ghes_edac: add platform check to enable ghes_edac Toshi Kani
2017-07-24 18:30 Borislav Petkov
2017-07-24 18:18 Borislav Petkov
2017-07-24 18:12 Toshi Kani
2017-07-24 18:10 Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2017-07-24 17:56 Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2017-07-24 17:54 Toshi Kani
2017-07-24 17:50 Borislav Petkov
2017-07-24 17:44 Toshi Kani
2017-07-24 16:44 Borislav Petkov
2017-07-24 16:37 Borislav Petkov
2017-07-24 16:04 Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2017-07-24 15:56 Toshi Kani
2017-07-24 15:37 Borislav Petkov
2017-07-24 15:25 Toshi Kani
2017-07-24 15:04 Borislav Petkov
2017-07-24 14:49 Toshi Kani
2017-07-22 6:28 Borislav Petkov
2017-07-21 17:23 Borislav Petkov
2017-07-21 17:21 Toshi Kani
2017-07-21 17:01 Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2017-07-21 16:53 Luck, Tony
2017-07-21 16:40 Toshi Kani
2017-07-21 16:32 Toshi Kani
2017-07-21 15:53 Borislav Petkov
2017-07-21 15:44 Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2017-07-21 15:34 Toshi Kani
2017-07-21 15:13 Borislav Petkov
2017-07-21 15:08 Toshi Kani
2017-07-21 13:47 Borislav Petkov
2017-07-21 13:40 Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2017-07-21 13:34 Borislav Petkov
2017-07-21 0:00 Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2017-07-20 21:15 Luck, Tony
2017-07-20 21:07 Toshi Kani
2017-07-20 20:15 Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2017-07-20 19:50 Toshi Kani
2017-07-20 18:16 Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2017-07-20 17:10 Luck, Tony
2017-07-20 17:05 Borislav Petkov
2017-07-20 16:55 Luck, Tony
2017-07-20 15:04 Borislav Petkov
2017-07-20 14:42 Toshi Kani
2017-07-20 4:33 Borislav Petkov
2017-07-20 4:19 Borislav Petkov
2017-07-20 4:16 Borislav Petkov
2017-07-19 20:13 Toshi Kani
2017-07-19 20:06 Luck, Tony
2017-07-19 18:55 Aristeu Rozanski
2017-07-19 18:06 Luck, Tony
2017-07-19 16:56 Toshi Kani
2017-07-19 16:40 Toshi Kani
2017-07-19 16:22 Borislav Petkov
2017-07-19 16:10 Toshi Kani
2017-07-19 16:02 Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2017-07-19 15:57 Borislav Petkov
2017-07-19 15:14 Luck, Tony
2017-07-19 6:01 Borislav Petkov
2017-07-19 5:58 Borislav Petkov
2017-07-19 5:55 Borislav Petkov
2017-07-19 5:52 Borislav Petkov
2017-07-18 22:13 Luck, Tony
2017-07-18 21:20 Toshi Kani
2017-07-18 21:15 Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2017-07-18 19:58 Toshi Kani
2017-07-18 16:42 Toshi Kani
2017-07-18 16:24 Jeffrey Hugo
2017-07-18 15:36 Toshi Kani
2017-07-18 14:39 Jeffrey Hugo
2017-07-18 8:08 Borislav Petkov
2017-07-18 6:00 Borislav Petkov
2017-07-17 21:59 Toshi Kani
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1500661773.2042.53.camel@hpe.com \
--to=toshi.kani@hpe.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@s-opensource.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).