From: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
To: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
kees@kernel.org, rppt@kernel.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
nik.borisov@suse.com, tglx@kernel.org, vschneid@redhat.com,
kprateek.nayak@amd.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
bp@alien8.de, thorsten.blum@linux.dev, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
tony.luck@intel.com, david@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
seanjc@google.com, ljs@kernel.org, zhangguopeng@kylinos.cn,
dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, mhocko@suse.com,
vinicius.gomes@intel.com, tj@kernel.org, vbabka@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
surenb@google.com, hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org,
dmatlack@google.com, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
pratyush@kernel.org, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, gmonaco@redhat.com, jgross@suse.com,
mgorman@suse.de, graf@amazon.com, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org,
liam@infradead.org, ridong.chen@linux.dev, longman@redhat.com,
bsegall@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 7/8] sched/topology: Avoid redundant percpu allocations and bitmap walks in build_sched_domains()
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2026 16:17:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1ec1aab8eabdad173ddef7483a940bfa3f6c3238.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261015153331.1872641-8-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
On Thu, 2026-10-15 at 11:33 -0400, Pasha Tatashin wrote:
> During CPU hotplug, build_sched_domains() is invoked on every CPU
> activation and deactivation. Profiling build_sched_domains() on a
> 480-CPU Intel Xeon 6985P-C and a 512-CPU AMD EPYC 9B45 shows several
> sources of avoidable O(N^2) and O(N) work per step:
>
> 1. build_sched_groups() and build_overlap_sched_groups() iterate over
> every bit of sched_domain_span(sd) via for_each_cpu_wrap(i, span, cpu)
> and check cpumask_test_cpu(i, covered) one CPU at a time, even after
> entire child groups (e.g., 120-CPU NUMA nodes) have been added to
> covered. Instead, track the remaining uncovered CPUs
> (cpumask_copy(uncovered, span)), clear each built group's span with
> cpumask_andnot(), and advance directly to the next uncovered CPU.
>
> 2. __visit_domain_allocation_hell() and __free_domain_allocs() allocate
> and free 3 * nr_levels + 2 temporary per-CPU pointer arrays via
> alloc_percpu() / free_percpu() on every domain rebuild. Reuse the
> per-CPU pointer arrays across domain rebuilds under
> sched_domains_mutex, clearing entries in __free_domain_allocs() and
> only freeing the topology-level arrays when sched_domain_topology is
> replaced in sched_init_numa() / sched_reset_numa().
sched_domains_mutex does not protect the free:
[snip]
> #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> +static void __sdt_free_percpu(void)
> +{
> + struct sched_domain_topology_level *tl;
> +
> + for_each_sd_topology(tl) {
> + struct sd_data *sdd = &tl->data;
> +
sched_init_numa() and sched_reset_numa() are called from
sched_update_numa(), which runs from sched_cpu_activate() and
sched_cpu_deactivate() without sched_domains_mutex. The free is safe
because every domain builder holds at least cpus_read_lock(), and
sched_update_numa() runs under the hotplug write lock.
Please fix the changelog and add lockdep_assert_cpus_held()
in __sdt_free_percpu(), so a future caller cannot break this without a warning.
> + free_percpu(sdd->sd);
> + sdd->sd = NULL;
> + free_percpu(sdd->sg);
> + sdd->sg = NULL;
> + free_percpu(sdd->sgc);
> + sdd->sgc = NULL;
> + }
> +}
> +
> static int cpu_numa_flags(void)
> {
> return SD_NUMA;
> @@ -2449,6 +2483,7 @@ void sched_init_numa(int offline_node)
> /*
> * Copy the default topology bits..
> */
> + __sdt_free_percpu();
> for (i = 0; sched_domain_topology[i].mask; i++)
> tl[i] = sched_domain_topology[i];
>
> @@ -2507,6 +2542,7 @@ static void sched_reset_numa(void)
> kfree(masks);
> }
> if (sched_domain_topology_saved) {
> + __sdt_free_percpu();
> kfree(sched_domain_topology);
> sched_domain_topology = sched_domain_topology_saved;
> sched_domain_topology_saved = NULL;
> @@ -2708,17 +2744,23 @@ static int __sdt_alloc(const struct cpumask *cpu_map)
> for_each_sd_topology(tl) {
> struct sd_data *sdd = &tl->data;
>
> - sdd->sd = alloc_percpu(struct sched_domain *);
> - if (!sdd->sd)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> + if (!sdd->sd) {
> + sdd->sd = alloc_percpu(struct sched_domain *);
> + if (!sdd->sd)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
>
> - sdd->sg = alloc_percpu(struct sched_group *);
> - if (!sdd->sg)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> + if (!sdd->sg) {
> + sdd->sg = alloc_percpu(struct sched_group *);
> + if (!sdd->sg)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
>
> - sdd->sgc = alloc_percpu(struct sched_group_capacity *);
> - if (!sdd->sgc)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> + if (!sdd->sgc) {
> + sdd->sgc = alloc_percpu(struct sched_group_capacity *);
> + if (!sdd->sgc)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
>
Keeping the arrays also means every slot must be NULL when a build
starts. Patch 5 depends on that: get_group(),
init_overlap_sched_group() and init_sched_domain_shared() treat a NULL
slot as "not allocated yet", and the overlap fast path treats
"sgc->ref > 0" as "set up in this build". An old pointer would pass
these checks and be used without a warning.
The rule holds today, but nothing says so. It also depends on builds
never filling a slot outside cpu_map, because the clearing loops only
visit cpu_map. Please write this down and check it, for example in
__sdt_alloc():
> for_each_cpu(j, cpu_map) {
> struct sched_domain *sd;
Maybe add
/*
* The slot arrays are kept between builds. Every slot for a CPU
* in cpu_map must be NULL here; lazy allocation treats NULL as
* "not allocated in this build". claim_allocations() and
* __sdt_free()/__sds_free() clear the slots, but only for
* cpu_map, so a build must not fill slots outside cpu_map.
*/
for_each_cpu(j, cpu_map) {
struct sched_domain *sd;
WARN_ON_ONCE(*per_cpu_ptr(sdd->sd, j) ||
*per_cpu_ptr(sdd->sg, j) ||
*per_cpu_ptr(sdd->sgc, j));
> @@ -2748,30 +2790,36 @@ static void __sdt_free(const struct cpumask *cpu_map)
>
> if (sdd->sd) {
> sd = *per_cpu_ptr(sdd->sd, j);
> - if (sd && (sd->flags & SD_NUMA))
> - free_sched_groups(sd->groups, 0);
> - kfree(*per_cpu_ptr(sdd->sd, j));
> + if (sd) {
> + if (sd->flags & SD_NUMA)
> + free_sched_groups(sd->groups, 0);
> + kfree(sd);
> + *per_cpu_ptr(sdd->sd, j) = NULL;
> + }
> }
>
> - if (sdd->sg)
> + if (sdd->sg) {
> kfree(*per_cpu_ptr(sdd->sg, j));
> - if (sdd->sgc)
> + *per_cpu_ptr(sdd->sg, j) = NULL;
> + }
> + if (sdd->sgc) {
> kfree(*per_cpu_ptr(sdd->sgc, j));
> + *per_cpu_ptr(sdd->sgc, j) = NULL;
> + }
> }
> - free_percpu(sdd->sd);
> - sdd->sd = NULL;
> - free_percpu(sdd->sg);
> - sdd->sg = NULL;
> - free_percpu(sdd->sgc);
> - sdd->sgc = NULL;
> }
> }
>
> +static struct sched_domain_shared * __percpu *sched_domains_sds;
> +
> static int __sds_alloc(struct s_data *d, const struct cpumask *cpu_map)
> {
and maybe similar check
for_each_cpu(j, cpu_map)
WARN_ON_ONCE(*per_cpu_ptr(d->sds, j));
> - d->sds = alloc_percpu(struct sched_domain_shared *);
> - if (!d->sds)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> + if (!sched_domains_sds) {
> + sched_domains_sds = alloc_percpu(struct sched_domain_shared *);
> + if (!sched_domains_sds)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> + d->sds = sched_domains_sds;
>
> return 0;
> }
Thanks.
Tim
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-15 23:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-15 15:33 [PATCH v1 0/8] x86, sched, mm: Speed up CPU hotplug on large systems Pasha Tatashin
2026-10-15 15:33 ` [PATCH v1 1/8] x86/realmode: Remove unnecessary WBINVD from AP startup trampoline Pasha Tatashin
2026-10-15 15:33 ` [PATCH v1 2/8] x86/smp: Remove unnecessary WBINVD from mwait_play_dead() Pasha Tatashin
2026-10-15 15:33 ` [PATCH v1 3/8] x86/mce/intel: Bound cmci_rediscover() to a single topology peer Pasha Tatashin
2026-10-15 15:33 ` [PATCH v1 4/8] x86/cacheinfo, mtrr: Skip stop_machine rendezvous in cache_ap_online() when MTRRs match Pasha Tatashin
2026-10-15 15:33 ` [PATCH v1 5/8] sched/topology: Avoid redundant O(N^3) group capacity walks and unused allocations in build_sched_domains() Pasha Tatashin
2026-10-16 6:23 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-10-15 15:33 ` [PATCH v1 6/8] sched/deadline, topology: Avoid O(N^2) dl_server bandwidth walks during root_domain rebuilds Pasha Tatashin
2026-10-15 15:33 ` [PATCH v1 7/8] sched/topology: Avoid redundant percpu allocations and bitmap walks in build_sched_domains() Pasha Tatashin
2026-10-15 23:17 ` Tim Chen [this message]
2026-10-15 15:33 ` [PATCH v1 8/8] mm/vmstat: Avoid redundant per-CPU stat_threshold writes in refresh_zone_stat_thresholds() Pasha Tatashin
2026-10-15 21:33 ` [PATCH v1 0/8] x86, sched, mm: Speed up CPU hotplug on large systems Luck, Tony
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1ec1aab8eabdad173ddef7483a940bfa3f6c3238.camel@linux.intel.com \
--to=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=gmonaco@redhat.com \
--cc=graf@amazon.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nik.borisov@suse.com \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
--cc=ridong.chen@linux.dev \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=thorsten.blum@linux.dev \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vinicius.gomes@intel.com \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=zhangguopeng@kylinos.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox