From: jason.yqhu@gmail.com
To: bluesmoke-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: It seems kobject_put for mci->edac_mci_kobj were called more than kobject_get
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:06:23 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1f6dcb291002241906m3c5cc7d4o8767d0276ff2228@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
Hi,
It seems that mci->edac_mci_kobj is put more that expected.
A typical call sequence to add a mc device is :
1. call edac_mc_alloc
mci->edac_mci_kobj was initialized by calling edac_mc_register_sysfs_main_kobj
2. ...
3. edac_mc_add_mc:
added to global list, but no reference count operation for mci->edac_mci_kobj
And to remove a mc device
1. call edac_mc_del_mc
edac_remove_sysfs_mci_device(mci) was called:
/* unregister this instance's kobject */
kobject_put(&mci->edac_mci_kobj);
We can see from the log here that mci is freed.
2. edac_mc_free:
edac_mc_unregister_sysfs_main_kobj(mci) was called:
/* delete the kobj from the mc_kset */
kobject_put(&mci->edac_mci_kobj)
Since mci has been freed. This operation will do nothing if mci is not
reused by others, other wise, a panic occurs.
And sometimes if mci is used after it is freed, there will be strange
debug message output:
EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_del_mc()
EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_workq_teardown() mci-0
EDAC DEBUG: edac_remove_sysfs_mci_device()
EDAC DEBUG: edac_remove_sysfs_mci_device() unreg csrow-0
EDAC DEBUG: edac_csrow_instance_release()
EDAC DEBUG: edac_remove_sysfs_mci_device() remove_link
EDAC DEBUG: edac_remove_sysfs_mci_device() remove_mci_instance
EDAC DEBUG: edac_remove_sysfs_mci_device() unregister this mci kobj
EDAC DEBUG: edac_mci_control_release() mci instance idx=0 releasing
EDAC MC: Removed device 0 for <NULL> <NULL>: DEV <NULL>
EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_del_mc() mc_devices list is now EMPTY
Could some one help me confirm this ?
Thanks
Jason
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
reply other threads:[~2010-02-25 3:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1f6dcb291002241906m3c5cc7d4o8767d0276ff2228@mail.gmail.com \
--to=jason.yqhu@gmail.com \
--cc=bluesmoke-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).