From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
linux-edac@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [18/21] edac: cpc925: use for_each_of_cpu_node iterator
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2018 10:35:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180906083506.GA10768@zn.tnic> (raw)
On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 02:37:35PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> Use the for_each_of_cpu_node iterator to iterate over cpu nodes. This
> has the side effect of defaulting to iterating using "cpu" node names in
> preference to the deprecated (for FDT) device_type == "cpu".
>
> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
> Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>
> Cc: linux-edac@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> ---
> Please ack and I will take via the DT tree. This is dependent on the
> first 2 patches.
Completely unknown territory for me so I'd trust your judgement. Staring
at 1/21, the conversion looks ok except the removal of those prints that
a cpu nodes are not present - I wonder if they even meant anything or
were just there during driver development...
> drivers/edac/cpc925_edac.c | 20 ++------------------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/edac/cpc925_edac.c b/drivers/edac/cpc925_edac.c
> index 2c98e020df05..3c0881ac9880 100644
> --- a/drivers/edac/cpc925_edac.c
> +++ b/drivers/edac/cpc925_edac.c
> @@ -593,8 +593,7 @@ static void cpc925_mc_check(struct mem_ctl_info *mci)
> /******************** CPU err device********************************/
> static u32 cpc925_cpu_mask_disabled(void)
> {
> - struct device_node *cpus;
> - struct device_node *cpunode = NULL;
> + struct device_node *cpunode;
> static u32 mask = 0;
>
> /* use cached value if available */
> @@ -603,20 +602,8 @@ static u32 cpc925_cpu_mask_disabled(void)
>
> mask = APIMASK_ADI0 | APIMASK_ADI1;
>
> - cpus = of_find_node_by_path("/cpus");
> - if (cpus == NULL) {
> - cpc925_printk(KERN_DEBUG, "No /cpus node !\n");
This thing...
> - return 0;
> - }
> -
> - while ((cpunode = of_get_next_child(cpus, cpunode)) != NULL) {
> + for_each_of_cpu_node(cpunode) {
> const u32 *reg = of_get_property(cpunode, "reg", NULL);
> -
> - if (strcmp(cpunode->type, "cpu")) {
> - cpc925_printk(KERN_ERR, "Not a cpu node in /cpus: %s\n", cpunode->name);
... and this thing.
Thx.
next reply other threads:[~2018-09-06 8:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-06 8:35 Borislav Petkov [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-09-06 12:20 [18/21] edac: cpc925: use for_each_of_cpu_node iterator Borislav Petkov
2018-09-06 11:12 Rob Herring
2018-09-05 19:37 Rob Herring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180906083506.GA10768@zn.tnic \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox