* Re: [RESEND PATCHv3 0/3] Update Stratix10 EDAC Bindings
[not found] <1554388597-28019-1-git-send-email-thor.thayer@linux.intel.com>
@ 2019-04-09 19:11 ` Thor Thayer
2019-04-09 20:13 ` Borislav Petkov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Thor Thayer @ 2019-04-09 19:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bp, dinguyen, robh+dt, mark.rutland
Cc: mchehab, james.morse, devicetree, linux-edac, linux-kernel
Hi Boris,
On 4/4/19 9:36 AM, thor.thayer@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Thor Thayer <thor.thayer@linux.intel.com>
>
> This patch series makes the Stratix10 EDAC Bindings
> specific to the Stratix10 ARM64 architecture.
>
> Instead of using the Arria10 (ARM32) EDAC bindings for
> Stratix10 (ARM64), create Stratix10 specific EDAC bindings
> to capture architecture differences between ARM32 and ARM64.
> This requires fixing the previous Stratix10 bindings.
> Also add the peripheral bindings for the Stratix10.
>
> V2: Remove Stratix10 compatible check.
>
> V3: Remove patches not related to EDAC bindings so that
> this patchset is targeted toward the bindings.
> Improve the Stratix10 specific binding description by
> adding in descriptions of ARM64 differences.
>
> Resend: Add Reviewed-by and Acked-by from bindings and
> socfpga device tree maintainers. I'd like this to go
> through the EDAC tree since future patches will have
> a dependency on these bindings and device tree.
>
> Thor Thayer (3):
> Documentation: dt: edac: Fix Stratix10 IRQ bindings
> Documentation: dt: edac: Add Stratix10 Peripheral bindings
> arm64: dts: stratix10: Use new Stratix10 EDAC bindings
>
> .../devicetree/bindings/edac/socfpga-eccmgr.txt | 135 +++++++++++++++++++--
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/altera/socfpga_stratix10.dtsi | 25 ++--
> 2 files changed, 138 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
If possible, I'd like this series to go through the EDAC tree since
future patches will follow this format.
Regards,
Thor
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [RESEND PATCHv3 0/3] Update Stratix10 EDAC Bindings
2019-04-09 19:11 ` [RESEND PATCHv3 0/3] Update Stratix10 EDAC Bindings Thor Thayer
@ 2019-04-09 20:13 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-04-09 22:32 ` Thor Thayer
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Borislav Petkov @ 2019-04-09 20:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thor Thayer
Cc: dinguyen, robh+dt, mark.rutland, mchehab, james.morse, devicetree,
linux-edac, linux-kernel
On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 02:11:58PM -0500, Thor Thayer wrote:
> If possible, I'd like this series to go through the EDAC tree since future
> patches will follow this format.
You know how that works - I need ACKs.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [RESEND PATCHv3 0/3] Update Stratix10 EDAC Bindings
2019-04-09 20:13 ` Borislav Petkov
@ 2019-04-09 22:32 ` Thor Thayer
2019-04-10 19:04 ` Borislav Petkov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Thor Thayer @ 2019-04-09 22:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Borislav Petkov
Cc: dinguyen, robh+dt, mark.rutland, mchehab, james.morse, devicetree,
linux-edac, linux-kernel
Hi Boris,
On 4/9/19 3:13 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 02:11:58PM -0500, Thor Thayer wrote:
>> If possible, I'd like this series to go through the EDAC tree since future
>> patches will follow this format.
>
> You know how that works - I need ACKs.
>
I have ACKs on patches 1 & 3. Patch 2 has a Reviewed-by from Rob Herring
which was sufficient in the past.
Here are the links to the original ACKs and Reviewed-by.
Patch 1: https://patchwork.codeaurora.org/patch/737155/
Patch 2: https://patchwork.codeaurora.org/patch/757205/
Patch 3: https://patchwork.codeaurora.org/patch/757207/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [RESEND PATCHv3 0/3] Update Stratix10 EDAC Bindings
2019-04-09 22:32 ` Thor Thayer
@ 2019-04-10 19:04 ` Borislav Petkov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Borislav Petkov @ 2019-04-10 19:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thor Thayer
Cc: dinguyen, robh+dt, mark.rutland, mchehab, james.morse, devicetree,
linux-edac, linux-kernel
On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 05:32:07PM -0500, Thor Thayer wrote:
> I have ACKs on patches 1 & 3. Patch 2 has a Reviewed-by from Rob Herring
> which was sufficient in the past.
Sorry about that - I missed those because I looked only at the diffstat
and decided this series is not for me :)
Anyway, all three applied now.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-04-10 19:05 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <1554388597-28019-1-git-send-email-thor.thayer@linux.intel.com>
2019-04-09 19:11 ` [RESEND PATCHv3 0/3] Update Stratix10 EDAC Bindings Thor Thayer
2019-04-09 20:13 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-04-09 22:32 ` Thor Thayer
2019-04-10 19:04 ` Borislav Petkov
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox