Linux EDAC development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: [RESEND PATCHv3 0/3] Update Stratix10 EDAC Bindings
       [not found] <1554388597-28019-1-git-send-email-thor.thayer@linux.intel.com>
@ 2019-04-09 19:11 ` Thor Thayer
  2019-04-09 20:13   ` Borislav Petkov
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Thor Thayer @ 2019-04-09 19:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bp, dinguyen, robh+dt, mark.rutland
  Cc: mchehab, james.morse, devicetree, linux-edac, linux-kernel

Hi Boris,

On 4/4/19 9:36 AM, thor.thayer@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Thor Thayer <thor.thayer@linux.intel.com>
> 
> This patch series makes the Stratix10 EDAC Bindings
> specific to the Stratix10 ARM64 architecture.
> 
> Instead of using the Arria10 (ARM32) EDAC bindings for
> Stratix10 (ARM64), create Stratix10 specific EDAC bindings
> to capture architecture differences between ARM32 and ARM64.
> This requires fixing the previous Stratix10 bindings.
> Also add the peripheral bindings for the Stratix10.
> 
> V2: Remove Stratix10 compatible check.
> 
> V3: Remove patches not related to EDAC bindings so that
>      this patchset is targeted toward the bindings.
>      Improve the Stratix10 specific binding description by
>      adding in descriptions of ARM64 differences.
> 
> Resend: Add Reviewed-by and Acked-by from bindings and
>      socfpga device tree maintainers. I'd like this to go
>      through the EDAC tree since future patches will have
>      a dependency on these bindings and device tree.
> 
> Thor Thayer (3):
>    Documentation: dt: edac: Fix Stratix10 IRQ bindings
>    Documentation: dt: edac: Add Stratix10 Peripheral bindings
>    arm64: dts: stratix10: Use new Stratix10 EDAC bindings
> 
>   .../devicetree/bindings/edac/socfpga-eccmgr.txt    | 135 +++++++++++++++++++--
>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/altera/socfpga_stratix10.dtsi  |  25 ++--
>   2 files changed, 138 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> 

If possible, I'd like this series to go through the EDAC tree since 
future patches will follow this format.

Regards,

Thor

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [RESEND PATCHv3 0/3] Update Stratix10 EDAC Bindings
  2019-04-09 19:11 ` [RESEND PATCHv3 0/3] Update Stratix10 EDAC Bindings Thor Thayer
@ 2019-04-09 20:13   ` Borislav Petkov
  2019-04-09 22:32     ` Thor Thayer
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Borislav Petkov @ 2019-04-09 20:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thor Thayer
  Cc: dinguyen, robh+dt, mark.rutland, mchehab, james.morse, devicetree,
	linux-edac, linux-kernel

On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 02:11:58PM -0500, Thor Thayer wrote:
> If possible, I'd like this series to go through the EDAC tree since future
> patches will follow this format.

You know how that works - I need ACKs.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [RESEND PATCHv3 0/3] Update Stratix10 EDAC Bindings
  2019-04-09 20:13   ` Borislav Petkov
@ 2019-04-09 22:32     ` Thor Thayer
  2019-04-10 19:04       ` Borislav Petkov
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Thor Thayer @ 2019-04-09 22:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Borislav Petkov
  Cc: dinguyen, robh+dt, mark.rutland, mchehab, james.morse, devicetree,
	linux-edac, linux-kernel

Hi Boris,

On 4/9/19 3:13 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 02:11:58PM -0500, Thor Thayer wrote:
>> If possible, I'd like this series to go through the EDAC tree since future
>> patches will follow this format.
> 
> You know how that works - I need ACKs.
> 

I have ACKs on patches 1 & 3. Patch 2 has a Reviewed-by from Rob Herring 
which was sufficient in the past.

Here are the links to the original ACKs and Reviewed-by.

Patch 1: https://patchwork.codeaurora.org/patch/737155/
Patch 2: https://patchwork.codeaurora.org/patch/757205/
Patch 3: https://patchwork.codeaurora.org/patch/757207/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [RESEND PATCHv3 0/3] Update Stratix10 EDAC Bindings
  2019-04-09 22:32     ` Thor Thayer
@ 2019-04-10 19:04       ` Borislav Petkov
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Borislav Petkov @ 2019-04-10 19:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thor Thayer
  Cc: dinguyen, robh+dt, mark.rutland, mchehab, james.morse, devicetree,
	linux-edac, linux-kernel

On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 05:32:07PM -0500, Thor Thayer wrote:
> I have ACKs on patches 1 & 3. Patch 2 has a Reviewed-by from Rob Herring
> which was sufficient in the past.

Sorry about that - I missed those because I looked only at the diffstat
and decided this series is not for me :)

Anyway, all three applied now.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2019-04-10 19:05 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <1554388597-28019-1-git-send-email-thor.thayer@linux.intel.com>
2019-04-09 19:11 ` [RESEND PATCHv3 0/3] Update Stratix10 EDAC Bindings Thor Thayer
2019-04-09 20:13   ` Borislav Petkov
2019-04-09 22:32     ` Thor Thayer
2019-04-10 19:04       ` Borislav Petkov

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox