From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BF68C33CB1 for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 15:51:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DECC207FF for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 15:51:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alien8.de header.i=@alien8.de header.b="B9PDoURN" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726410AbgAPPvW (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Jan 2020 10:51:22 -0500 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:41954 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726151AbgAPPvW (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Jan 2020 10:51:22 -0500 Received: from zn.tnic (p200300EC2F0B23002957B4D0D21CE7EE.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2f0b:2300:2957:b4d0:d21c:e7ee]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 03DF71EC071C; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 16:51:20 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1579189881; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=Wgupd+vOvik6VGLiIGC59MyorQUoRE4q6Dw4T3BddQQ=; b=B9PDoURNxaeK1V/0ll4/vaNNTUmNSiwgq4cI9FHPlIp1aDBaATDHydkLzH8Ndhp6avesjO gz/3Z4Inhx8fZT01x84RQc0XDsnM5LXKslNcWt4l7AMYYInV+m/9rbWTULvtzpgJEcGTpD WtUurxpcw50qhYomFLN6n9rjZB0ctqo= Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 16:51:16 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: Yazen Ghannam Cc: linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bp@suse.de, tony.luck@intel.com, x86@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] x86/MCE/AMD, EDAC/mce_amd: Add new Load Store unit McaType Message-ID: <20200116155116.GE27148@zn.tnic> References: <20200110015651.14887-1-Yazen.Ghannam@amd.com> <20200110015651.14887-2-Yazen.Ghannam@amd.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200110015651.14887-2-Yazen.Ghannam@amd.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-edac-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-edac@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 01:56:47AM +0000, Yazen Ghannam wrote: > From: Yazen Ghannam > > Future SMCA systems may see a new version of the Load Store unit bank ^^^^^^^^ Yah, you've been hanging around with hw people too much. I can just as well reply: "well, I'll apply the patch when I see future SMCA systems" :-) All I'm saying is, forget those "may" formulations when it comes to kernel patches. :-) -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette