From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8732AC433DB for ; Mon, 28 Dec 2020 18:36:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E413229EF for ; Mon, 28 Dec 2020 18:36:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728806AbgL1Sgj (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Dec 2020 13:36:39 -0500 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:36206 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728804AbgL1Sgi (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Dec 2020 13:36:38 -0500 Received: from zn.tnic (p200300ec2f07e40085f47ee5beeb4d19.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2f07:e400:85f4:7ee5:beeb:4d19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 42B1E1EC03FA; Mon, 28 Dec 2020 19:35:57 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1609180557; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=qPxWIwUrwc6PSC5IAuON4YtJ3HEhC4wLA/FNfgUYLJA=; b=UgpV6EDu3fHMNWeF94rMTKAEa+Zm2shzYiigfDMI/Gc3n7w6S1JFwIknnaF3nUCrQxmA1I SlYDv4/n1UnYIPz4uVJoL0AXgAWSL9ONPkUYjijd7isYSpIeuBaT/Lyv8pgSpugeRFNa7Y BV76q9Ih8QTHC0MSbTT1DFtCCu16b9s= Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2020 19:35:54 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: Yazen Ghannam Cc: linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] EDAC/amd64: Tone down messages about missing PCI IDs Message-ID: <20201228183554.GB20321@zn.tnic> References: <20201215170131.8496-1-Yazen.Ghannam@amd.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201215170131.8496-1-Yazen.Ghannam@amd.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-edac@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 05:01:31PM +0000, Yazen Ghannam wrote: > From: Yazen Ghannam > > Give these messages a debug severity as they are really only useful to > the module developers. > > Also, drop the "(broken BIOS?)" phrase, since this can cause churn for > BIOS folks. The PCI IDs needed by the module, at least on modern systems, > are fixed in hardware. > > Signed-off-by: Yazen Ghannam > --- > drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c | 8 ++++---- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) Applied, thanks. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette