Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix crash when using Qcom LLCC/EDAC drivers

[Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>]

On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 01:33:06PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 04:50:32PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > I know get_maintainer.pl :) But the problem is, Qualcomm recently
> > switched their email domain from codeaurora.org to quicinc.com.
> 
> Great:
> 
> $ git grep codeaurora.org MAINTAINERS | wc -l
> 5
> 

Yep! Most of the active developers have already changed their domains in
MAINTAINERS file. But the left ones are either not actively maintained
(yeah bad) or the maintainers have left Qualcomm.

> ;-\
> 
> > So even if I use the maintainers codeaurora domain now, they will
> > bounce.
> 
> Hmm, so the mails I sent with codeaurora on Cc didn't bounce back - I
> got only the quicinc bounces. That doesn't mean that codeaurora actually
> gets delivered...
> 

Not sure why. It was supposed to bounce. But could be that Qualcomm IT
decided to not bounce anymore since they have got enough complaints from
developers ;)

> > For that reason, I used their quicinc domain addresses. But since they
> > are bouncing, it looks like the maintainers left Qualcomm :/
> 
> Hmm, is there some way to get in touch with those folks?
> 

I don't think so. I checked in the internal Qualcomm database and
confirmed that I couldn't find the maintainers names there.

> Or whoever is taking over those drivers?
> 

LLCC is maintained by Bjorn (CCed) since it falls under soc/qcom. But I'm
not sure about EDAC. I think we should mark it as not maintainted until we
find a volunteer.

Bjorn, thoughts?

Thanks,
Mani

> Thx.
> 
> -- 
> Regards/Gruss,
>     Boris.
> 
> https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette