From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E8CFC3DA7A for ; Mon, 2 Jan 2023 17:31:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234924AbjABRbF (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jan 2023 12:31:05 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36552 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236486AbjABRay (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jan 2023 12:30:54 -0500 Received: from mail-pg1-x536.google.com (mail-pg1-x536.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::536]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79FD3E5C for ; Mon, 2 Jan 2023 09:30:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pg1-x536.google.com with SMTP id f3so18680382pgc.2 for ; Mon, 02 Jan 2023 09:30:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=4s4wsz0Tk2Jz2ceTAUaJ6etP/WVSBkTpQfdDdNo8WCc=; b=DpPx6wfB2HnOq2BBjbvvIxqTb0V7oVXkys0a+9vVYmu6kd7dh4YkESkKpARAH9vR6A jHkpAqIvLr65TsVny4PE9y43+4HLxDD4NdyJ6CAH18egz90QLtrLkuwJpsAHSwRfOl0/ q5tPr9nOADl8DFxsqzfaMdRk27+rUOoyNgjrYdwgFJfBRi9k2oTomkQFNqfKi8xxinpv lSfYOehB7y3IsL7R0oANqXtl7JzJHCA0OE9vMAt3D87yDEQyB0WAcAChe2AyBg5658Jr ccVX1PUzlcvtoRAF7sgkXLLHN4pxEcr33n2oz7iCPYbGBuSGgyEKB/6U6khBWxjSeMOf 0krQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=4s4wsz0Tk2Jz2ceTAUaJ6etP/WVSBkTpQfdDdNo8WCc=; b=GRtnB/wFoJxxgi+LlCD9vTDl6kWZmvojZWuBdob/XzYkEGKb5J4veNEQLpfbC+Hylf TG3dZ0njj7I8NhIQUPEZNFl/6j2LNN5Toz9zWQHuAjrHvweibECpC0o2yFXUmCoIQKM9 IKfRiUzpwaHTkRdUH2EYtjv6oQrZCYy3n7P4id9ukfl/582QKQnvtxqHiEKh2qQNvKg+ AJQ62GQElffw3qfj2o0K0Yusbbqh05Jf8rRSqSTURTaCXXfyVpBWVeJ014sjGN6f6ASp xZbd7D+ZmIRAVZXHxKvU9g7sa1Va7jC7MI/PlyaQBRz/PEwqRvXO+EemACMPrAzka5/w S2cg== X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2kpmtgrXDXmJPowYvs1X8pMW9kNQ09JePtayPn/bKz+tjiceop6R ieVJGut8mSk0hFFuclr3D6mT X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXt5RpPjZsD7c+56DP2frozOtIwA9hlgCrBcqheqig1WsrUF9YF8gSP+pm/elGNIQSHCpk5gZQ== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:8043:0:b0:573:487d:e852 with SMTP id y3-20020aa78043000000b00573487de852mr49354904pfm.4.1672680651935; Mon, 02 Jan 2023 09:30:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from thinkpad ([220.158.159.123]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j186-20020a6255c3000000b00576259507c0sm18779367pfb.100.2023.01.02.09.30.46 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 02 Jan 2023 09:30:50 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2023 23:00:45 +0530 From: Manivannan Sadhasivam To: Borislav Petkov Cc: andersson@kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, tony.luck@intel.com, quic_saipraka@quicinc.com, konrad.dybcio@linaro.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, james.morse@arm.com, mchehab@kernel.org, rric@kernel.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, quic_ppareek@quicinc.com, luca.weiss@fairphone.com, ahalaney@redhat.com, steev@kali.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/17] Qcom: LLCC/EDAC: Fix base address used for LLCC banks Message-ID: <20230102173045.GB16638@thinkpad> References: <20221228084028.46528-1-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org> <20221228164711.GB256211@thinkpad> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-edac@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 06:55:47PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 10:17:11PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote: > > Well, some maintainers prefer to pick the independent patches through their > > tree. That's why I moved those patches to the start of the series. > > Once some maintainers experience a crazy dependency hell between trees, > they would find routing it all through a single tree a lot easier the > next time. > > > If you are fine with all patches going through qcom tree, I do not > > have any issue :) > > I'm reviewing. > Ok! I'll wait for your reviews on the rest of the EDAC patches before doing the respin. Thanks, Mani > -- > Regards/Gruss, > Boris. > > https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette -- மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்