From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6D8B5C99; Wed, 24 Jul 2024 13:31:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1721827886; cv=none; b=HN8ylyRmGUsEjbO3GT5MhaAr8bzDyp6emLXTBtnAy4ejGTmetSI1FTlIRQfkbqqLC0IEyQE8NV/tW0GM+zNpsd6HqQkW2g0N8AhUYF4zWd8lNsmduRHnTMHTa1xgyO+MAgxMUOULcZzKWyhZwBCYsz11va2BylkwWsuLlSpPnWU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1721827886; c=relaxed/simple; bh=0HL4WVSHtRXn+vpGOcPrYw57HxjrdAloUVqOke83U7Q=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=HJDmjTWSkL0RXQPgbhKWAljd5W0rIXuhZdufL02i2mzkxlLK1xrD/eKIpp1KlvI/NKbm0blad3NH62bPHPFzPApakrk4/VLoo6y3kAyEnxzIvE9MeEQpKjBO335U18iPXSOgx+UVLXLFep9qDWkxadH9rh84bfvXdCb9oc6MTb0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=DQoBhuq6; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="DQoBhuq6" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C5CEBC32782; Wed, 24 Jul 2024 13:31:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1721827885; bh=0HL4WVSHtRXn+vpGOcPrYw57HxjrdAloUVqOke83U7Q=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=DQoBhuq67hnF+ID50fkAl6Wax1FYuJNXFzM1ra6Ly7sthRTt4BE/+hN1jDlBJmc6N EUBVkQ2dUZONs+WXgLp3PQcvRGdXuDa2vXVAFS7vm6Hr+MKmirn5aq9p9D8vxhczCU 6lUQNrdIhsrDkS++oOn/YkR0FM8ng7ud18xLuk8k= Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2024 15:31:21 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Ma Ke Cc: kristo@kernel.org, bp@alien8.de, tony.luck@intel.com, james.morse@arm.com, mchehab@kernel.org, rric@kernel.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND] EDAC/ti: Fix possible null pointer dereference in _emif_get_id() Message-ID: <2024072407-census-mahogany-5831@gregkh> References: <20240724071042.1493917-1-make24@iscas.ac.cn> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-edac@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240724071042.1493917-1-make24@iscas.ac.cn> On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 03:10:42PM +0800, Ma Ke wrote: > In _emif_get_id(), of_get_address() may return NULL which is later > dereferenced. Fix this bug by adding NULL check. > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > Fixes: 86a18ee21e5e ("EDAC, ti: Add support for TI keystone and DRA7xx EDAC") > Signed-off-by: Ma Ke > --- > Changes in v2: > - added Cc stable line. > --- > drivers/edac/ti_edac.c | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/edac/ti_edac.c b/drivers/edac/ti_edac.c > index 29723c9592f7..db23887b2d81 100644 > --- a/drivers/edac/ti_edac.c > +++ b/drivers/edac/ti_edac.c > @@ -207,6 +207,9 @@ static int _emif_get_id(struct device_node *node) > int my_id = 0; > > addrp = of_get_address(node, 0, NULL, NULL); > + if (!addrp) > + return -EINVAL; > + How was this found? How was this tested? thanks, greg k-h