[PATCH 1/2] RAS/AMD/ATL: Include row[13] bit in row retirement

Yazen Ghannam
2025-04-01T20:49:32Z

Based on feedback from hardware folks, row[13] is part of the variable
bits within a physical row (along with all column bits).

Only half the physical addresses affected by a row are calculated if
this bit is not included.

Add the row[13] bit to the row retirement flow.

Fixes: 3b566b30b414 ("RAS/AMD/ATL: Add MI300 row retirement support")
Signed-off-by: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@amd.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
---
drivers/ras/amd/atl/umc.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/ras/amd/atl/umc.c b/drivers/ras/amd/atl/umc.c
index dc8aa12f63c8..cb8ace3d4e42 100644
--- a/drivers/ras/amd/atl/umc.c
+++ b/drivers/ras/amd/atl/umc.c
@@ -320,7 +320,7 @@ static unsigned long convert_dram_to_norm_addr_mi300(unsigned long addr)
* See amd_atl::convert_dram_to_norm_addr_mi300() for MI300 address formats.
*/
#define MI300_NUM_COL BIT(HWEIGHT(MI300_UMC_MCA_COL))
-static void retire_row_mi300(struct atl_err *a_err)
+static void _retire_row_mi300(struct atl_err *a_err)
{
unsigned long addr;
struct page *p;
@@ -351,6 +351,23 @@ static void retire_row_mi300(struct atl_err *a_err)
}
}

+/*
+ * In addition to the column bits, the row[13] bit should also be included when
+ * calculating addresses affected by a physical row.
+ *
+ * Instead of running through another loop over a single bit, just run through
+ * the column bits twice and flip the row[13] bit in-between.
+ *
+ * See MI300_UMC_MCA_ROW for the row bits in MCA_ADDR_UMC value.
+ */
+#define MI300_UMC_MCA_ROW13 BIT(23)
+static void retire_row_mi300(struct atl_err *a_err)
+{
+ _retire_row_mi300(a_err);
+ a_err->addr ^= MI300_UMC_MCA_ROW13;
+ _retire_row_mi300(a_err);
+}
+
void amd_retire_dram_row(struct atl_err *a_err)
{
if (df_cfg.rev == DF4p5 && df_cfg.flags.heterogeneous)

--
2.49.0