Linux EDAC development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Avadhut Naik <avadhut.naik@amd.com>
To: <linux-edac@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <bp@alien8.de>, <yazen.ghannam@amd.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <avadhut.naik@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/5] EDAC/amd64: Remove NUM_CONTROLLERS macro
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2025 18:53:11 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250909185748.1621098-3-avadhut.naik@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250909185748.1621098-1-avadhut.naik@amd.com>

Currently, the NUM_CONTROLLERS macro is only used to statically allocate
the csels array of struct chip_select in struct amd64_pvt.

The size of this array, however, will never exceed the number of UMCs on
the SOC. Since, max_mcs variable in struct amd64_pvt already stores the
number of UMCs on the SOC, the macro can be removed and the static array
can be dynamically allocated instead.

Signed-off-by: Avadhut Naik <avadhut.naik@amd.com>
---
Changes in v3:
Patch introduced.
---
 drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c | 19 +++++++++++++------
 drivers/edac/amd64_edac.h |  5 ++---
 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
index 3989794e4f29..0fade110c3fb 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
@@ -4000,30 +4000,34 @@ static int probe_one_instance(unsigned int nid)
 	if (ret < 0)
 		goto err_enable;
 
+	pvt->csels = kcalloc(pvt->max_mcs, sizeof(*pvt->csels), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!pvt->csels)
+		goto err_enable;
+
 	ret = pvt->ops->hw_info_get(pvt);
 	if (ret < 0)
-		goto err_enable;
+		goto err_csels;
 
 	ret = 0;
 	if (!instance_has_memory(pvt)) {
 		amd64_info("Node %d: No DIMMs detected.\n", nid);
-		goto err_enable;
+		goto err_csels;
 	}
 
 	if (!pvt->ops->ecc_enabled(pvt)) {
 		ret = -ENODEV;
 
 		if (!ecc_enable_override)
-			goto err_enable;
+			goto err_csels;
 
 		if (boot_cpu_data.x86 >= 0x17) {
 			amd64_warn("Forcing ECC on is not recommended on newer systems. Please enable ECC in BIOS.");
-			goto err_enable;
+			goto err_csels;
 		} else
 			amd64_warn("Forcing ECC on!\n");
 
 		if (!enable_ecc_error_reporting(s, nid, F3))
-			goto err_enable;
+			goto err_csels;
 	}
 
 	ret = init_one_instance(pvt);
@@ -4033,7 +4037,7 @@ static int probe_one_instance(unsigned int nid)
 		if (boot_cpu_data.x86 < 0x17)
 			restore_ecc_error_reporting(s, nid, F3);
 
-		goto err_enable;
+		goto err_csels;
 	}
 
 	amd64_info("%s detected (node %d).\n", pvt->ctl_name, pvt->mc_node_id);
@@ -4043,6 +4047,8 @@ static int probe_one_instance(unsigned int nid)
 
 	return ret;
 
+err_csels:
+	kfree(pvt->csels);
 err_enable:
 	hw_info_put(pvt);
 	kfree(pvt);
@@ -4077,6 +4083,7 @@ static void remove_one_instance(unsigned int nid)
 	/* Free the EDAC CORE resources */
 	mci->pvt_info = NULL;
 
+	kfree(pvt->csels);
 	hw_info_put(pvt);
 	kfree(pvt);
 	edac_mc_free(mci);
diff --git a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.h b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.h
index 56999ed3ae56..39d30255c767 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.h
+++ b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.h
@@ -96,7 +96,6 @@
 /* Hardware limit on ChipSelect rows per MC and processors per system */
 #define NUM_CHIPSELECTS			8
 #define DRAM_RANGES			8
-#define NUM_CONTROLLERS			12
 
 #define ON true
 #define OFF false
@@ -347,8 +346,8 @@ struct amd64_pvt {
 	u32 dbam0;		/* DRAM Base Address Mapping reg for DCT0 */
 	u32 dbam1;		/* DRAM Base Address Mapping reg for DCT1 */
 
-	/* one for each DCT/UMC */
-	struct chip_select csels[NUM_CONTROLLERS];
+	/* Allocate one for each DCT/UMC */
+	struct chip_select *csels;
 
 	/* DRAM base and limit pairs F1x[78,70,68,60,58,50,48,40] */
 	struct dram_range ranges[DRAM_RANGES];
-- 
2.43.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-09-09 18:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-09 18:53 [PATCH v3 0/5] Cleanup and add support for AMD Family 1Ah-based SOCs Avadhut Naik
2025-09-09 18:53 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] EDAC/amd64: Generate ctl_name string at runtime Avadhut Naik
2025-09-10 14:51   ` Yazen Ghannam
2025-09-10 15:53     ` Naik, Avadhut
2025-09-09 18:53 ` Avadhut Naik [this message]
2025-09-10 15:05   ` [PATCH v3 2/5] EDAC/amd64: Remove NUM_CONTROLLERS macro Yazen Ghannam
2025-09-10 15:48     ` Naik, Avadhut
2025-09-09 18:53 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] EDAC/amd64: Add support for AMD family 1Ah-based newer models Avadhut Naik
2025-09-10 15:13   ` Yazen Ghannam
2025-09-10 16:08     ` Naik, Avadhut
2025-09-09 18:53 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] EDAC/mc_sysfs: Increase legacy channel support to 16 Avadhut Naik
2025-09-10 15:17   ` Yazen Ghannam
2025-09-10 15:29     ` Naik, Avadhut
2025-09-09 18:53 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] EDAC/mc_sysfs: Begin deprecating legacy sysfs EDAC interface Avadhut Naik
2025-09-10 15:24   ` Yazen Ghannam
2025-09-10 17:38     ` Naik, Avadhut
2025-09-15 17:04       ` Yazen Ghannam
2025-09-16 16:09         ` Naik, Avadhut

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250909185748.1621098-3-avadhut.naik@amd.com \
    --to=avadhut.naik@amd.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yazen.ghannam@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox