From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 374B61C28E; Fri, 31 Oct 2025 12:39:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761914341; cv=none; b=PYltm7/X8c4nLoCoxry+pHbYlohTk3X1ZWePqgKZWweehyRns0tNSt7yHIUINXnKkxJ1Tx7A3V1mffEJj2X1H17p9MxRL2ZMQCU793yVo5e8+vQfPHsCDPQGc5IAcyfwhzf+oceU87TojateFaN5lVwsKoCkSCf4Uxo0000LcZM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761914341; c=relaxed/simple; bh=gxgnWkdOyiGUoiNKkes6YJ/qXMfJLU1DXX/Btzew2wE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=mfOjqIfdrcrV/YSpzWsKD7ncdQZZEqFl5lucxO34Qi+c2hJ/ueI2w1DtqQnjI5ppObk51oD6KClYYZN6pBq0NsdqV8orpOxH3Cp9r/oVG9BPhWklhapmZ2uiv1bV0S1fJK7wyBDMhD9Bh+33TphAxZ6J38EHfjJAjy1BeYZc8DU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=e+ysPSfu; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="e+ysPSfu" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 60CEBC4CEE7; Fri, 31 Oct 2025 12:39:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1761914340; bh=gxgnWkdOyiGUoiNKkes6YJ/qXMfJLU1DXX/Btzew2wE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=e+ysPSfugIGUrkQpt6JwWovpHV7pOL+NYze6gAJd08GEF7LED3hWtEnFxoOfso6NA mZGc+j5/CbFR2/PzB9FErfN6sTvw1MSB3DXhlg/1QD5DiA9QIChxAHZ/IKPayH44IN OcrQy39oxxdrwBODuvZ67VKhQ/oI7c65+2Zh6eF0= Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2025 13:38:57 +0100 From: Greg KH To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Avadhut Naik , linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, yazen.ghannam@amd.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] EDAC/mc_sysfs: Begin deprecating legacy sysfs EDAC interface Message-ID: <2025103150-subside-tux-fd46@gregkh> References: <20251013173632.1449366-1-avadhut.naik@amd.com> <20251013173632.1449366-5-avadhut.naik@amd.com> <20251029172419.GGaQJNw4Pofl1x1mve@fat_crate.local> <2025103029-reforest-negate-cc34@gregkh> <20251030191858.GEaQO6ImJ4fbqB_5ag@fat_crate.local> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-edac@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20251030191858.GEaQO6ImJ4fbqB_5ag@fat_crate.local> On Thu, Oct 30, 2025 at 08:18:58PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Thu, Oct 30, 2025 at 04:01:43PM +0100, Greg KH wrote: > > No one is going to notice this type of kernel log message. If you think > > that no one is using the sysfs files, delete them now. Why wait? > > > > sysfs is meant to be such that userspace can handle file removals (i.e. > > that value is not present.) Unfortunately, sometimes this does not > > actually happen and user tools do mess up and rely on things. So either > > no one uses the file and it can be removed now, OR you have to leave it > > in for "forever". There's no real chance to remove it later, that's > > just postponing the decision. > > Lemme try to repeat what you're proposing to make sure we're on the same page: > > we simply zap the files and see if anyone complains. If yes, we figure out why > they're using them and if they can't be moved to the new interface, we restore > them and maintain them forever. > > Right? Yup!