Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] x86/mce, EDAC/mce_amd: Reorder SMCA bank type enums

[Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@amd.com>]

On Sun, Mar 08, 2026 at 11:20:46AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 07, 2026 at 11:33:14AM -0500, Yazen Ghannam wrote:
> > +/* Order by HWID then McaType with newline between HWID groups. */
> 
> So I would argue that keeping them *all* sorted the same makes reading and
> touching that code the simplest. Because you will have to modify the same
> spots when you add new ones and the hwid number doesn't really matter for
> humans.
> 
> IOW, this:
> 
> /*
>  * Format:
>  * { bank_type, hwid_mcatype }
>  *
>  * alphanumerically sorted by bank type.
>  */
> static const struct smca_hwid smca_hwid_mcatypes[] = {
>         { SMCA_CS,       HWID_MCATYPE(0x2E, 0x0)        },
>         { SMCA_CS_V2,    HWID_MCATYPE(0x2E, 0x2)        },
>         { SMCA_DE,       HWID_MCATYPE(0xB0, 0x3)        },
>         { SMCA_EX,       HWID_MCATYPE(0xB0, 0x5)        },
>         { SMCA_FP,       HWID_MCATYPE(0xB0, 0x6)        },
>         { SMCA_GMI_PCS,  HWID_MCATYPE(0x241, 0x0)       },
>         { SMCA_GMI_PHY,  HWID_MCATYPE(0x269, 0x0)       },
>         { SMCA_IF,       HWID_MCATYPE(0xB0, 0x1)        },
>         { SMCA_L2_CACHE, HWID_MCATYPE(0xB0, 0x2)        },
>         { SMCA_L3_CACHE, HWID_MCATYPE(0xB0, 0x7)        },
>         { SMCA_LS,       HWID_MCATYPE(0xB0, 0x0)        },
>         { SMCA_LS_V2,    HWID_MCATYPE(0xB0, 0x10)       },
>         { SMCA_MA_LLC,   HWID_MCATYPE(0x2E, 0x4)        },
>         { SMCA_MP5,      HWID_MCATYPE(0x01, 0x2)        },
>         { SMCA_MPDMA,    HWID_MCATYPE(0x01, 0x3)        },
>         { SMCA_NBIF,     HWID_MCATYPE(0x6C, 0x0)        },
>         { SMCA_NBIO,     HWID_MCATYPE(0x18, 0x0)        },
>         { SMCA_PB,       HWID_MCATYPE(0x05, 0x0)        },
>         { SMCA_PCIE,     HWID_MCATYPE(0x46, 0x0)        },
>         { SMCA_PCIE_V2,  HWID_MCATYPE(0x46, 0x1)        },
>         { SMCA_PIE,      HWID_MCATYPE(0x2E, 0x1)        },
>         { SMCA_PSP,      HWID_MCATYPE(0xFF, 0x0)        },
>         { SMCA_PSP_V2,   HWID_MCATYPE(0xFF, 0x1)        },
>         { SMCA_RESERVED, HWID_MCATYPE(0x00, 0x0)        },
>         { SMCA_SATA,     HWID_MCATYPE(0xA8, 0x0)        },
>         { SMCA_SHUB,     HWID_MCATYPE(0x80, 0x0)        },
>         { SMCA_SMU,      HWID_MCATYPE(0x01, 0x0)        },
>         { SMCA_SMU_V2,   HWID_MCATYPE(0x01, 0x1)        },
>         { SMCA_UMC,      HWID_MCATYPE(0x96, 0x0)        },
>         { SMCA_UMC_V2,   HWID_MCATYPE(0x96, 0x1)        },
>         { SMCA_USB,      HWID_MCATYPE(0xAA, 0x0)        },
>         { SMCA_USR_CP,   HWID_MCATYPE(0x180, 0x0)       },
>         { SMCA_USR_DP,   HWID_MCATYPE(0x170, 0x0)       },
>         { SMCA_WAFL_PHY, HWID_MCATYPE(0x267, 0x0)       },
>         { SMCA_XGMI_PCS, HWID_MCATYPE(0x50, 0x0)        },
>         { SMCA_XGMI_PHY, HWID_MCATYPE(0x259, 0x0)       },
> };
> 

Yeah, I see your point. This didn't sit right with me at first, but it
feels better after looking at it longer.

Want me to send another revision?

Thanks,
Yazen