From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 168FF413259; Thu, 26 Mar 2026 17:23:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774545833; cv=none; b=u3Kcj/QelIocoYEPmw3d/pA2S0qCa3k0kT50Vl+8Z8Srx75wWwYO1oRwhFmZaembd8Eu1G26dBbDqSgXehQurv9oxFj9Cv5Ug3rHGCo/THpghv1/m69wH4PWDftEc9/kwaujCSEZTzGZvc6EhBH1cHZb3NRZD+OkmaYzt3N8+/Y= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774545833; c=relaxed/simple; bh=jJmlpac80zwUsAWqRFRE5W5E4jpys3n9j4q3g4U5Cwg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=fXBmdegZSm5Wq9iSYsnbMwEuXhCMIIsKmC2evzIEnwF03y0YxyrPKtwth5u9LJ8eivGVJo3X4Ex/iMR4BbvBr3Qh8HEFQHohq8406TrOuA2SReOr3LpVUns5+oYTcBlEue5EdpNOL19NfBm6x482dovtvpDl+aQjMmlQkdmLeUc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=ZzJZhbZw; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="ZzJZhbZw" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1774545830; x=1806081830; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=jJmlpac80zwUsAWqRFRE5W5E4jpys3n9j4q3g4U5Cwg=; b=ZzJZhbZw8cs6Wx1OtNEh9LepJUYMnq20VL+f8GbNvyd4ph3/HcS6TWOE gQvOuNYlLUdtrWJZ2iFNFVU/YoNrQ04NBeO04tonXsmJitoV6m2c2pkT+ NHDTPQo9ZC7314JPme6SakdkbR/5ZwcJdE2gf7/KLZg5R+NrZ/bHmeqNh FJ6sPFt6WBAsYcac458qhRyigvPpRRl8xLdu9U/1/KBvuYn6O1MWFuxue kbvgZfmWqg0oM9wfr9+INU2dwQfxm+FZ2xGhW+80LkaMozAMVV0/lUmNB yAtC4mkoxESYE9QwpbZlLzQSHqIzKXlJXfvaF8VBaM2Sg6COhoCiQwETn A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: hJegtfcAQTaM7YLqCkkfZw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: RgBL1HBxToKRS5qcRPRbdg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11741"; a="75631368" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,142,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="75631368" Received: from fmviesa009.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.149]) by orvoesa110.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Mar 2026 10:23:48 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: XtXiMnUSROec8CzTHDfHvw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: rU9dt+OTTjSVhCuTuzamLQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,142,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="218464915" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 3905d212be1b) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmviesa009.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 26 Mar 2026 10:23:45 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 3905d212be1b with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1w5oQo-0000000097J-2irT; Thu, 26 Mar 2026 17:23:42 +0000 Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2026 01:23:10 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Prasanna Kumar T S M , shubhrajyoti.datta@amd.com, bp@alien8.de, tony.luck@intel.com, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] EDAC/versalnet: Fix device name memory leak Message-ID: <202603270107.jJ92lLm3-lkp@intel.com> References: <20260322131149.1684771-1-ptsm@linux.microsoft.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-edac@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260322131149.1684771-1-ptsm@linux.microsoft.com> Hi Prasanna, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on next-20260320] [cannot apply to ras/edac-for-next linus/master v7.0-rc5 v7.0-rc4 v7.0-rc3 v7.0-rc5] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Prasanna-Kumar-T-S-M/EDAC-versalnet-Release-reference-to-remoteproc-device-in-remove/20260324-014933 base: next-20260320 patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260322131149.1684771-1-ptsm%40linux.microsoft.com patch subject: [PATCH 5/5] EDAC/versalnet: Fix device name memory leak config: arm64-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260327/202603270107.jJ92lLm3-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 19.1.7 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project cd708029e0b2869e80abe31ddb175f7c35361f90) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260327/202603270107.jJ92lLm3-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202603270107.jJ92lLm3-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> Warning: drivers/edac/versalnet_edac.c:163 struct member 'mci_name' not described in 'mc_priv' >> Warning: drivers/edac/versalnet_edac.c:163 struct member 'mci_name' not described in 'mc_priv' -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki